191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17687838)
21. The effect of protease and
Hejdysz M; Kaczmarek SA; Kubiś M; Wiśniewska Z; Peris S; Budnik S; Rutkowski A
Br Poult Sci; 2020 Jun; 61(3):287-293. PubMed ID: 31951479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Raw and rendered animal by-products as ingredients in dog diets.
Murray SM; Patil AR; Fahey GC; Merchen NR; Hughes DM
J Anim Sci; 1997 Sep; 75(9):2497-505. PubMed ID: 9303468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effect of feeding soybean meal and differently processed peas on the gut mucosal immune system of broilers.
Röhe I; Göbel TW; Goodarzi Boroojeni F; Zentek J
Poult Sci; 2017 Jul; 96(7):2064-2073. PubMed ID: 28339726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The effects of fermentation and enzymatic treatment of pea on nutrient digestibility and growth performance of broilers.
Goodarzi Boroojeni F; Senz M; Kozłowski K; Boros D; Wisniewska M; Rose D; Männer K; Zentek J
Animal; 2017 Oct; 11(10):1698-1707. PubMed ID: 28416038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Nutritional assessment of raw and germinated pea (Pisum sativum L.) protein and carbohydrate by in vitro and in vivo techniques.
Urbano G; López-Jurado M; Frejnagel S; Gómez-Villalva E; Porres JM; Frías J; Vidal-Valverde C; Aranda P
Nutrition; 2005 Feb; 21(2):230-9. PubMed ID: 15723753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The effect of heat on amino acids for growing pigs. 3. The availability of lysine from heat-treated field peas (Pisum sativum cultivar Dundale) determined using the slope-ratio assay.
Van Barneveld RJ; Batterham ES; Norton BW
Br J Nutr; 1994 Aug; 72(2):257-75. PubMed ID: 7947644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Molecular basis of processing-induced changes in protein structure in relation to intestinal digestion in yellow and green type pea (Pisum sativum L.): A molecular spectroscopic analysis.
Yu GQ; Warkentin T; Niu Z; Khan NA; Yu P
Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc; 2015 Dec; 151():980-8. PubMed ID: 26188704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effect of sprouting on nutritional quality of pulses.
Erba D; Angelino D; Marti A; Manini F; Faoro F; Morreale F; Pellegrini N; Casiraghi MC
Int J Food Sci Nutr; 2019 Feb; 70(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 29848118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Exploring the in vivo digestion of plant proteins in broiler chickens.
Recoules E; Sabboh-Jourdan H; Narcy A; Lessire M; Harichaux G; Labas V; Duclos MJ; Réhault-Godbert S
Poult Sci; 2017 Jun; 96(6):1735-1747. PubMed ID: 28339732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Review of the health benefits of peas (Pisum sativum L.).
Dahl WJ; Foster LM; Tyler RT
Br J Nutr; 2012 Aug; 108 Suppl 1():S3-10. PubMed ID: 22916813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effect of field peas, chickpeas, and lentils on rumen fermentation, digestion, microbial protein synthesis, and feedlot performance in receiving diets for beef cattle.
Gilbery TC; Lardy GP; Soto-Navarro SA; Bauer ML; Anderson VL
J Anim Sci; 2007 Nov; 85(11):3045-53. PubMed ID: 17591715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Expression of the insecticidal bean alpha-amylase inhibitor transgene has minimal detrimental effect on the nutritional value of peas fed to rats at 30% of the diet.
Pusztai A; Bardocz GG; Alonso R; Chrispeels MJ; Schroeder HE; Tabe LM; Higgins TJ
J Nutr; 1999 Aug; 129(8):1597-603. PubMed ID: 10419997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Multi-criteria assessment of pea protein quality in rats: a comparison between casein, gluten and pea protein alone or supplemented with methionine.
Guillin FM; Gaudichon C; Guérin-Deremaux L; Lefranc-Millot C; Azzout-Marniche D; Khodorova N; Calvez J
Br J Nutr; 2021 Feb; 125(4):389-397. PubMed ID: 32713356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Biological utilization of vegetable peas: effect of cooking and varietal differences.
Saharan K; Khetarpaul N
Plant Foods Hum Nutr; 1994 Jun; 45(4):321-9. PubMed ID: 7971773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Nutritional evaluation of low-phytate peas (Pisum sativum L.) for young broiler chicks.
Thacker P; Deep A; Petri D; Warkentin T
Arch Anim Nutr; 2013 Feb; 67(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 23298192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Influence of partial replacement of soya bean meal by faba beans or peas in heavy pigs diet on meat quality, residual anti-nutritional factors and phytoestrogen content.
Gatta D; Russo C; Giuliotti L; Mannari C; Picciarelli P; Lombardi L; Giovannini L; Ceccarelli N; Mariotti L
Arch Anim Nutr; 2013 Jun; 67(3):235-47. PubMed ID: 23742644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The effects of thermal treatment of field peas (Pisum sativum L.) on nutrient and energy digestibility by growing pigs.
Stein HH; Bohlke RA
J Anim Sci; 2007 Jun; 85(6):1424-31. PubMed ID: 17371788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Faba beans and peas in poultry feed: economic assessment.
Proskina L; Cerina S
J Sci Food Agric; 2017 Oct; 97(13):4391-4398. PubMed ID: 28480573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Nutritional evaluation of pea (Pisum sativum L.) protein diets after mild hydrothermal treatment and with and without added phytase.
Urbano G; Aranda P; Gómez-Villalva E; Frejnagel S; Porres JM; Frías J; Vidal-Valverde C; López-Jurado M
J Agric Food Chem; 2003 Apr; 51(8):2415-20. PubMed ID: 12670190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Selenium Contents in Different Types of Raw and Processed Meat Products, Consumed Among the General Population of Pakistan.
Almani S; Talpur FN; Memon N; Afridi HI
Biol Trace Elem Res; 2020 Feb; 193(2):357-363. PubMed ID: 31020514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
