138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17688269)
1. Scaffold permeability as a means to determine fiber diameter and pore size of electrospun fibrinogen.
Sell S; Barnes C; Simpson D; Bowlin G
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2008 Apr; 85(1):115-26. PubMed ID: 17688269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mechanical properties of electrospun fibrinogen structures.
McManus MC; Boland ED; Koo HP; Barnes CP; Pawlowski KJ; Wnek GE; Simpson DG; Bowlin GL
Acta Biomater; 2006 Jan; 2(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 16701855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Electrospun fibrinogen: feasibility as a tissue engineering scaffold in a rat cell culture model.
McManus MC; Boland ED; Simpson DG; Barnes CP; Bowlin GL
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2007 May; 81(2):299-309. PubMed ID: 17120217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of pore size on permeability and cell attachment in collagen scaffolds for tissue engineering.
O'Brien FJ; Harley BA; Waller MA; Yannas IV; Gibson LJ; Prendergast PJ
Technol Health Care; 2007; 15(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 17264409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The use of thermal treatments to enhance the mechanical properties of electrospun poly(epsilon-caprolactone) scaffolds.
Lee SJ; Oh SH; Liu J; Soker S; Atala A; Yoo JJ
Biomaterials; 2008 Apr; 29(10):1422-30. PubMed ID: 18096219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prediction of permeability of regular scaffolds for skeletal tissue engineering: a combined computational and experimental study.
Truscello S; Kerckhofs G; Van Bael S; Pyka G; Schrooten J; Van Oosterwyck H
Acta Biomater; 2012 Apr; 8(4):1648-58. PubMed ID: 22210520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Electrospun nanofibre fibrinogen for urinary tract tissue reconstruction.
McManus M; Boland E; Sell S; Bowen W; Koo H; Simpson D; Bowlin G
Biomed Mater; 2007 Dec; 2(4):257-62. PubMed ID: 18458483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Electrospun poly(epsilon-caprolactone) microfiber and multilayer nanofiber/microfiber scaffolds: characterization of scaffolds and measurement of cellular infiltration.
Pham QP; Sharma U; Mikos AG
Biomacromolecules; 2006 Oct; 7(10):2796-805. PubMed ID: 17025355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of bone ingrowth into porous biomaterials using MICRO-CT.
Jones AC; Arns CH; Sheppard AP; Hutmacher DW; Milthorpe BK; Knackstedt MA
Biomaterials; 2007 May; 28(15):2491-504. PubMed ID: 17335896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Experimental studies on preparation and property of scaffold material of bio-derived bone loading wo-1].
Liang J; Yang Z; Li X; Luo J
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Jun; 19(6):464-7. PubMed ID: 16038465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Electrospun biocomposite nanofibrous scaffolds for neural tissue engineering.
Prabhakaran MP; Venugopal JR; Chyan TT; Hai LB; Chan CK; Lim AY; Ramakrishna S
Tissue Eng Part A; 2008 Nov; 14(11):1787-97. PubMed ID: 18657027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fiber diameters control osteoblastic cell migration and differentiation in electrospun gelatin.
Sisson K; Zhang C; Farach-Carson MC; Chase DB; Rabolt JF
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2010 Sep; 94(4):1312-20. PubMed ID: 20694999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of scaffold architecture and pore size on smooth muscle cell growth.
Lee M; Wu BM; Dunn JC
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2008 Dec; 87(4):1010-6. PubMed ID: 18257081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nanobioengineered electrospun composite nanofibers and osteoblasts for bone regeneration.
Venugopal JR; Low S; Choon AT; Kumar AB; Ramakrishna S
Artif Organs; 2008 May; 32(5):388-97. PubMed ID: 18471168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of methods for the construction of collagenous scaffolds with a radial pore structure for tissue engineering.
Brouwer KM; van Rensch P; Harbers VE; Geutjes PJ; Koens MJ; Wijnen RM; Daamen WF; van Kuppevelt TH
J Tissue Eng Regen Med; 2011 Jun; 5(6):501-4. PubMed ID: 21604385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Measuring fiber alignment in electrospun scaffolds: a user's guide to the 2D fast Fourier transform approach.
Ayres CE; Jha BS; Meredith H; Bowman JR; Bowlin GL; Henderson SC; Simpson DG
J Biomater Sci Polym Ed; 2008; 19(5):603-21. PubMed ID: 18419940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biodegradable fumarate-based polyHIPEs as tissue engineering scaffolds.
Christenson EM; Soofi W; Holm JL; Cameron NR; Mikos AG
Biomacromolecules; 2007 Dec; 8(12):3806-14. PubMed ID: 17979240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of pore geometry on the in vitro biological behavior of human periosteum-derived cells seeded on selective laser-melted Ti6Al4V bone scaffolds.
Van Bael S; Chai YC; Truscello S; Moesen M; Kerckhofs G; Van Oosterwyck H; Kruth JP; Schrooten J
Acta Biomater; 2012 Jul; 8(7):2824-34. PubMed ID: 22487930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bone ingrowth in porous titanium implants produced by 3D fiber deposition.
Li JP; Habibovic P; van den Doel M; Wilson CE; de Wijn JR; van Blitterswijk CA; de Groot K
Biomaterials; 2007 Jun; 28(18):2810-20. PubMed ID: 17367852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of cellular proliferation on dense and porous PCL scaffolds.
Saşmazel HT; Gümüşderelioğlu M; Gürpinar A; Onur MA
Biomed Mater Eng; 2008; 18(3):119-28. PubMed ID: 18725692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
