These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17688389)

  • 21. Novel statistical tools for monitoring the safety of marketed drugs.
    Almenoff JS; Pattishall EN; Gibbs TG; DuMouchel W; Evans SJ; Yuen N
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2007 Aug; 82(2):157-66. PubMed ID: 17538548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. What do stakeholders think about pharmacovigilance?
    Edwards IR; Graedon T
    Drug Saf; 2010 Aug; 33(8):619-21. PubMed ID: 20635819
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The role of databases in drug postmarketing surveillance.
    Rodriguez EM; Staffa JA; Graham DJ
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2001; 10(5):407-10. PubMed ID: 11802586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A primer of drug safety surveillance: an industry perspective. Part I: Information flow, new drug development, and federal regulations.
    Allan MC
    J Pharm Technol; 1992; 8(4):162-7. PubMed ID: 10121011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Surveillance of adverse effects following vaccination and safety of immunization programs.
    Waldman EA; Luhm KR; Monteiro SA; Freitas FR
    Rev Saude Publica; 2011 Feb; 45(1):173-84. PubMed ID: 21181055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A Pharmacovigilance Signaling System Based on FDA Regulatory Action and Post-Marketing Adverse Event Reports.
    Hoffman KB; Dimbil M; Tatonetti NP; Kyle RF
    Drug Saf; 2016 Jun; 39(6):561-75. PubMed ID: 26946292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Mandatory pharmacovigilance.
    Maksymowych WP
    CMAJ; 2003 Mar; 168(6):672; discussion 672-3. PubMed ID: 12642413
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. FDA attempting to overcome major roadblocks in monitoring drug safety.
    Zielinski SL
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Jun; 97(12):872-3. PubMed ID: 15956645
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Implemented data mining and signal management systems on spontaneous reporting systems' databases and their availability to the scientific community - a systematic review.
    de Almeida Vieira Lima LM; Nunes NG; da Silva Dias PG; Marques FJ
    Curr Drug Saf; 2012 Apr; 7(2):170-5. PubMed ID: 22873501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Quantitative methods in pharmacovigilance: focus on signal detection.
    Hauben M; Zhou X
    Drug Saf; 2003; 26(3):159-86. PubMed ID: 12580646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The periodic safety update report as a pharmacovigilance tool.
    Klepper MJ
    Drug Saf; 2004; 27(8):569-78. PubMed ID: 15154828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Pharmacovigilance: Importance, concepts, and processes.
    Kumar A
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2017 Apr; 74(8):606-612. PubMed ID: 28235869
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. FDA's monitoring of postmarketing studies probed.
    Young D
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2006 Aug; 63(16):1485-6. PubMed ID: 16896075
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of the quality and value of data sources for postmarket surveillance of the safety of cough and cold medications in children.
    Green JL; Reynolds KM; Banner W; Bond GR; Kauffman RE; Palmer RB; Paul IM; Dart RC
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Dec; 18(1):175. PubMed ID: 30577764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A primer of drug safety surveillance: an industry perspective. Part III: Managing adverse-event data.
    Allan MC
    J Pharm Technol; 1992; 8(6):259-73. PubMed ID: 10122649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Strengthening and rationalizing pharmacovigilance in the EU: where is Europe heading to? A review of the new EU legislation on pharmacovigilance.
    Borg JJ; Aislaitner G; Pirozynski M; Mifsud S
    Drug Saf; 2011 Mar; 34(3):187-97. PubMed ID: 21332243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Adverse Events to Food Supplements Containing Red Yeast Rice: Comparative Analysis of FAERS and CAERS Reporting Systems.
    Raschi E; Girardi A; Poluzzi E; Forcesi E; Menniti-Ippolito F; Mazzanti G; De Ponti F
    Drug Saf; 2018 Aug; 41(8):745-752. PubMed ID: 29582393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Postmarketing hepatic adverse event experience with PEGylated/non-PEGylated drugs: a disproportionality analysis.
    Hauben M; Vegni F; Reich L; Younus M
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2007 Nov; 19(11):934-41. PubMed ID: 18049161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [The need for 'postmarketing surveillance'].
    Stricker BH; in 't Veld BA; Feenstra J
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Apr; 143(14):711-3. PubMed ID: 10347624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Review of the Methods to Obtain Paediatric Drug Safety Information: Spontaneous Reporting and Healthcare Databases, Active Surveillance Programmes, Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses.
    Gentili M; Pozzi M; Peeters G; Radice S; Carnovale C
    Curr Clin Pharmacol; 2018; 13(1):28-39. PubMed ID: 29412117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.