These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17688500)

  • 1. Confidence intervals and P-values for meta-analysis with publication bias.
    Henmi M; Copas JB; Eguchi S
    Biometrics; 2007 Jun; 63(2):475-82. PubMed ID: 17688500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A bound for publication bias based on the fraction of unpublished studies.
    Copas J; Jackson D
    Biometrics; 2004 Mar; 60(1):146-53. PubMed ID: 15032784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A robust P-value for treatment effect in meta-analysis with publication bias.
    Copas JB; Malley PF
    Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(21):4267-78. PubMed ID: 18384185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Empirical evaluation showed that the Copas selection model provided a useful summary in 80% of meta-analyses.
    Carpenter JR; Schwarzer G; Rücker G; Künstler R
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jun; 62(6):624-631.e4. PubMed ID: 19282148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Publication bias in trials other than RCTs].
    Timmer A
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2011; 105(3):194-200. PubMed ID: 21530909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimating a summarized odds ratio whilst eliminating publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Sugita M; Kanamori M; Izuno T; Miyakawa M
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 1992 Oct; 22(5):354-8. PubMed ID: 1469797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Empirical evaluation suggests Copas selection model preferable to trim-and-fill method for selection bias in meta-analysis.
    Schwarzer G; Carpenter J; Rücker G
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Mar; 63(3):282-8. PubMed ID: 19836925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Confidence intervals for random effects meta-analysis and robustness to publication bias.
    Henmi M; Copas JB
    Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(29):2969-83. PubMed ID: 20963748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The implications of publication bias for meta-analysis' other parameter.
    Jackson D
    Stat Med; 2006 Sep; 25(17):2911-21. PubMed ID: 16345059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Selection models with monotone weight functions in meta analysis.
    Rufibach K
    Biom J; 2011 Jul; 53(4):689-704. PubMed ID: 21567443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detecting and adjusting for small-study effects in meta-analysis.
    Rücker G; Carpenter JR; Schwarzer G
    Biom J; 2011 Mar; 53(2):351-68. PubMed ID: 21374698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Publication probability of a study on odds ratio value circumstantial evidence for publication bias in medical study areas.
    Sugita M; Yamaguchi N; Izuno T; Kanamori M; Kasuga H
    Tokai J Exp Clin Med; 1994 Sep; 19(1-2):29-37. PubMed ID: 7660381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance of the trim and fill method in the presence of publication bias and between-study heterogeneity.
    Peters JL; Sutton AJ; Jones DR; Abrams KR; Rushton L
    Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(25):4544-62. PubMed ID: 17476644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using pseudo-data to correct for publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Bowden J; Thompson JR; Burton P
    Stat Med; 2006 Nov; 25(22):3798-813. PubMed ID: 16382418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Arcsine test for publication bias in meta-analyses with binary outcomes.
    Rücker G; Schwarzer G; Carpenter J
    Stat Med; 2008 Feb; 27(5):746-63. PubMed ID: 17592831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Revisiting evidence on lung cancer and passive smoking: adjustment for publication bias by means of "trim and fill" algorithm.
    Takagi H; Sekino S; Kato T; Matsuno Y; Umemoto T
    Lung Cancer; 2006 Feb; 51(2):245-6. PubMed ID: 16386820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A likelihood approach to meta-analysis with random effects.
    Hardy RJ; Thompson SG
    Stat Med; 1996 Mar; 15(6):619-29. PubMed ID: 8731004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimating the proportion of studies missing for meta-analysis due to publication bias.
    Formann AK
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Sep; 29(5):732-9. PubMed ID: 18586577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Updating meta-analyses leads to larger type I errors than publication bias.
    Borm GF; Donders AR
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Aug; 62(8):825-830.e10. PubMed ID: 19136233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Publication bias in psychological science: prevalence, methods for identifying and controlling, and implications for the use of meta-analyses.
    Ferguson CJ; Brannick MT
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Mar; 17(1):120-8. PubMed ID: 21787082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.