BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17688512)

  • 1. Random effects modeling approaches for estimating ROC curves from repeated ordinal tests without a gold standard.
    Albert PS
    Biometrics; 2007 Jun; 63(2):593-602. PubMed ID: 17688512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nonparametric estimation of ROC curves in the absence of a gold standard.
    Zhou XH; Castelluccio P; Zhou C
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):600-9. PubMed ID: 16011710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies without a gold standard.
    Liu Y; Chen Y; Chu H
    Biometrics; 2015 Jun; 71(2):538-47. PubMed ID: 25358907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A parametric comparison of diagnostic accuracy with three ordinal diagnostic groups.
    Xiong C; van Belle G; Miller JP; Yan Y; Gao F; Yu K; Morris JC
    Biom J; 2007 Aug; 49(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17763377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measuring and estimating diagnostic accuracy when there are three ordinal diagnostic groups.
    Xiong C; van Belle G; Miller JP; Morris JC
    Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1251-73. PubMed ID: 16345029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Semiparametric estimation of the covariate-specific ROC curve in presence of ignorable verification bias.
    Liu D; Zhou XH
    Biometrics; 2011 Sep; 67(3):906-16. PubMed ID: 21361890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A crossed random effects modeling approach for estimating diagnostic accuracy from ordinal ratings without a gold standard.
    Xie Y; Chen Z; Albert PS
    Stat Med; 2013 Sep; 32(20):3472-85. PubMed ID: 23529923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Least squares regression methods for clustered ROC data with discrete covariates.
    Tang LL; Zhang W; Li Q; Ye X; Chan L
    Biom J; 2016 Jul; 58(4):747-65. PubMed ID: 26848938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diagnostic Accuracy of Conventional Cell Blocks Along with p16INK4 and Ki67 Biomarkers as Triage Tests in Resource-poor Organized Cervical Cancer Screening Programs.
    Desai F; Singh LS; Majachunglu G; Kamei H
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2019 Mar; 20(3):917-923. PubMed ID: 30912415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Random effects models for assessing diagnostic accuracy of traditional Chinese doctors in absence of a gold standard.
    Wang Z; Zhou XH
    Stat Med; 2012 Mar; 31(7):661-71. PubMed ID: 21626532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Semiparametric ROC surfaces for continuous diagnostic tests based on two test measurements.
    Wan S; Zhang B
    Stat Med; 2009 Aug; 28(18):2370-83. PubMed ID: 19499550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimating and comparing diagnostic tests' accuracy when the gold standard is not binary.
    Obuchowski NA
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Sep; 12(9):1198-204. PubMed ID: 16099683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. ROC curve estimation when covariates affect the verification process.
    Rodenberg C; Zhou XH
    Biometrics; 2000 Dec; 56(4):1256-62. PubMed ID: 11129488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nonparametric methods for analysing the accuracy of diagnostic tests with multiple readers.
    Kaufmann J; Werner C; Brunner E
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2005 Apr; 14(2):129-46. PubMed ID: 15807148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Verification bias-corrected estimators of the relative true and false positive rates of two binary screening tests.
    Alonzo TA
    Stat Med; 2005 Feb; 24(3):403-17. PubMed ID: 15543634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A cautionary note on the robustness of latent class models for estimating diagnostic error without a gold standard.
    Albert PS; Dodd LE
    Biometrics; 2004 Jun; 60(2):427-35. PubMed ID: 15180668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bayesian approaches to modeling the conditional dependence between multiple diagnostic tests.
    Dendukuri N; Joseph L
    Biometrics; 2001 Mar; 57(1):158-67. PubMed ID: 11252592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Covariate adjustment in estimating the area under ROC curve with partially missing gold standard.
    Liu D; Zhou XH
    Biometrics; 2013 Mar; 69(1):91-100. PubMed ID: 23410529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bayesian nonparametric estimation of ROC surface under verification bias.
    Zhu R; Ghosal S
    Stat Med; 2019 Aug; 38(18):3361-3377. PubMed ID: 31049998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of correlated ROC areas in diagnostic testing.
    Song HH
    Biometrics; 1997 Mar; 53(1):370-82. PubMed ID: 9147602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.