These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17688700)

  • 1. Structural footprinting in protein structure comparison: the impact of structural fragments.
    Zotenko E; Dogan RI; Wilbur WJ; O'Leary DP; Przytycka TM
    BMC Struct Biol; 2007 Aug; 7():53. PubMed ID: 17688700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Secondary structure spatial conformation footprint: a novel method for fast protein structure comparison and classification.
    Zotenko E; O'Leary DP; Przytycka TM
    BMC Struct Biol; 2006 Jun; 6():12. PubMed ID: 16762072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Structural alphabets for protein structure classification: a comparison study.
    Le Q; Pollastri G; Koehl P
    J Mol Biol; 2009 Mar; 387(2):431-50. PubMed ID: 19135454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantifying structure-function uncertainty: a graph theoretical exploration into the origins and limitations of protein annotation.
    Shakhnovich BE; Max Harvey J
    J Mol Biol; 2004 Apr; 337(4):933-49. PubMed ID: 15033362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Structural diversity of domain superfamilies in the CATH database.
    Reeves GA; Dallman TJ; Redfern OC; Akpor A; Orengo CA
    J Mol Biol; 2006 Jul; 360(3):725-41. PubMed ID: 16780872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing strategies for improved superfamily recognition.
    Sillitoe I; Dibley M; Bray J; Addou S; Orengo C
    Protein Sci; 2005 Jul; 14(7):1800-10. PubMed ID: 15937274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Current status of membrane protein structure classification.
    Neumann S; Fuchs A; Mulkidjanian A; Frishman D
    Proteins; 2010 May; 78(7):1760-73. PubMed ID: 20186977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What are the baselines for protein fold recognition?
    McGuffin LJ; Bryson K; Jones DT
    Bioinformatics; 2001 Jan; 17(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 11222263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The CATH Domain Structure Database and related resources Gene3D and DHS provide comprehensive domain family information for genome analysis.
    Pearl F; Todd A; Sillitoe I; Dibley M; Redfern O; Lewis T; Bennett C; Marsden R; Grant A; Lee D; Akpor A; Maibaum M; Harrison A; Dallman T; Reeves G; Diboun I; Addou S; Lise S; Johnston C; Sillero A; Thornton J; Orengo C
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2005 Jan; 33(Database issue):D247-51. PubMed ID: 15608188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. CATH--a hierarchic classification of protein domain structures.
    Orengo CA; Michie AD; Jones S; Jones DT; Swindells MB; Thornton JM
    Structure; 1997 Aug; 5(8):1093-108. PubMed ID: 9309224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Combining evolutionary and structural information for local protein structure prediction.
    Pei J; Grishin NV
    Proteins; 2004 Sep; 56(4):782-94. PubMed ID: 15281130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Similarity metrics for ligands reflecting the similarity of the target proteins.
    Schuffenhauer A; Floersheim P; Acklin P; Jacoby E
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2003; 43(2):391-405. PubMed ID: 12653501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Local feature frequency profile: a method to measure structural similarity in proteins.
    Choi IG; Kwon J; Kim SH
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2004 Mar; 101(11):3797-802. PubMed ID: 14985506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Protein fold similarity estimated by a probabilistic approach based on C(alpha)-C(alpha) distance comparison.
    Carugo O; Pongor S
    J Mol Biol; 2002 Jan; 315(4):887-98. PubMed ID: 11812155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A simple topological representation of protein structure: implications for new, fast, and robust structural classification.
    Bostick DL; Shen M; Vaisman II
    Proteins; 2004 Aug; 56(3):487-501. PubMed ID: 15229882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An integrated approach to the analysis and modeling of protein sequences and structures. I. Protein structural alignment and a quantitative measure for protein structural distance.
    Yang AS; Honig B
    J Mol Biol; 2000 Aug; 301(3):665-78. PubMed ID: 10966776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The CATH classification revisited--architectures reviewed and new ways to characterize structural divergence in superfamilies.
    Cuff AL; Sillitoe I; Lewis T; Redfern OC; Garratt R; Thornton J; Orengo CA
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2009 Jan; 37(Database issue):D310-4. PubMed ID: 18996897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An integrated approach to the analysis and modeling of protein sequences and structures. III. A comparative study of sequence conservation in protein structural families using multiple structural alignments.
    Yang AS; Honig B
    J Mol Biol; 2000 Aug; 301(3):691-711. PubMed ID: 10966778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing Protein Function Through Structural Similarities with CATH.
    Dawson NL; Orengo C; Gáspári Z
    Methods Mol Biol; 2020; 2112():43-57. PubMed ID: 32006277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accurate prediction of protein structural classes by incorporating predicted secondary structure information into the general form of Chou's pseudo amino acid composition.
    Kong L; Zhang L; Lv J
    J Theor Biol; 2014 Mar; 344():12-8. PubMed ID: 24316044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.