These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1768878)

  • 1. Perceptual features for normal listeners' phoneme recognition in a reverberant lecture hall.
    Danhauer JL; Johnson CE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1991 Apr; 2(2):91-8. PubMed ID: 1768878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.
    Donaldson GS; Kreft HA
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of spectrally asynchronous delays on consonant voicing perception.
    Ortmann AJ; Palmer CV; Pratt SR
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Sep; 21(8):493-511. PubMed ID: 21034697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Children's phoneme identification in reverberation and noise.
    Johnson CE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Feb; 43(1):144-57. PubMed ID: 10668658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patterns of phoneme perception errors by listeners with cochlear implants as a function of overall speech perception ability.
    Munson B; Donaldson GS; Allen SL; Collison EA; Nelson DA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Feb; 113(2):925-35. PubMed ID: 12597186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Phoneme feature perception in noise by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Gordon-Salant S
    J Speech Hear Res; 1985 Mar; 28(1):87-95. PubMed ID: 3982002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stop-consonant recognition for normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. II: Articulation index predictions.
    Dubno JR; Dirks DD; Schaefer AB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jan; 85(1):355-64. PubMed ID: 2921418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Features from normal and sensorineural listeners' nonsense syllable test errors.
    Doyle KJ; Danhauer JL; Edgerton BJ
    Ear Hear; 1981; 2(3):117-21. PubMed ID: 7250560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Phonetics of intervocalic consonant perception: retrospect and prospect.
    Pickett JM; Bunnell HT; Revoile SG
    Phonetica; 1995; 52(1):1-40. PubMed ID: 7862747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Consonant-feature transmission as a function of presentation level in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Gutnick HN
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Oct; 72(4):1124-30. PubMed ID: 7142577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. F1 structure provides information for final-consonant voicing.
    Summers WV
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Aug; 84(2):485-92. PubMed ID: 3170941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Carhart Memorial Lecture, American Auditory Society, Salt Lake City, Utah 1996. Phoneme and word recognition for words in isolation and in sentences.
    Olsen WO; Van Tasell DJ; Speaks CE
    Ear Hear; 1997 Jun; 18(3):175-88. PubMed ID: 9201453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of reverberation and noise on speech intelligibility in normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
    Xia J; Xu B; Pentony S; Xu J; Swaminathan J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Mar; 143(3):1523. PubMed ID: 29604671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Consonant-recognition patterns and self-assessment of hearing handicap.
    Hustedde CG; Wiley TL
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Dec; 34(6):1397-409. PubMed ID: 1787721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Consonant recognition and confusion patterns among elderly hearing-impaired subjects.
    Gordon-Salant S
    Ear Hear; 1987 Oct; 8(5):270-6. PubMed ID: 3678640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Consonant recognition for spectrally degraded speech as a function of consonant-vowel intensity ratio.
    Balakrishnan U; Freyman RL; Chiang YC; Nerbonne GP; Shea KJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Jun; 99(6):3758-69. PubMed ID: 8655807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The phonological representation of [voice] in speech perception.
    Jongman A; Sereno JA; Raaijmakers M; Lahiri A
    Lang Speech; 1992; 35 ( Pt 1-2)():137-52. PubMed ID: 1287384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Acoustic-phonetic context considerations for speech recognition testing of hearing-impaired listeners.
    Revoile S; Kozma-Spytek L; Holden-Pitt L; Pickett J; Droge J
    Ear Hear; 1995 Jun; 16(3):254-62. PubMed ID: 7672474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Recognition of digitized CV syllables in multitalker babble.
    Gordon-Salant S
    Audiology; 1985; 24(4):241-53. PubMed ID: 4051874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Context-independent dynamic information for the perception of coarticulated vowels.
    Jenkins JJ; Strange W; Trent SA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Jul; 106(1):438-48. PubMed ID: 10420634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.