These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1768884)
1. Effect of reference microphone location and loudspeaker azimuth on probe tube microphone measurements. Ickes MA; Hawkins DB; Cooper WA J Am Acad Audiol; 1991 Jul; 2(3):156-63. PubMed ID: 1768884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Probe-microphone measurements with body-worn instruments: loudspeaker and reference microphone effects. Nelson JA; Hawkins DB J Am Acad Audiol; 1994 Mar; 5(2):138-40. PubMed ID: 8180430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Estimated variability of real-ear insertion response (REIR) due to loudspeaker type and placement. Stone MA; Moore BC Int J Audiol; 2004 May; 43(5):271-5. PubMed ID: 15357410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of reference microphone placement on sound pressure levels at an ear level hearing aid microphone. Feigin JA; Barlow NL; Stelmachowicz PG Ear Hear; 1990 Oct; 11(5):321-6. PubMed ID: 2262080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Probe-tube microphone measures with very young infants: real ear to coupler differences and longitudinal changes in real ear unaided response. Westwood GF; Bamford JM Ear Hear; 1995 Jun; 16(3):263-73. PubMed ID: 7672475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Individualized correction factors in the preselection of hearing aids. Fikret-Pasa S; Revit LJ J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Apr; 35(2):384-400. PubMed ID: 1573878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hearing aid microphone location effects on speech discrimination in noise. Franks JR; Feth LL; Daniloff RG Ear Hear; 1981; 2(6):241-50. PubMed ID: 7308598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Test-retest reliability of probe-microphone verification in children fitted with open and closed hearing aid tips. Kim H; Ricketts TA J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(7):635-42. PubMed ID: 24047950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of microphone location in ITE versus BTE hearing aids. Gartrell EL; Church GT J Am Acad Audiol; 1990 Jul; 1(3):151-3. PubMed ID: 2132598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of FM systems with an ear canal probe tube microphone system. Hawkins DB Ear Hear; 1987 Oct; 8(5):301-3. PubMed ID: 3678646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The use of a miniature microphone in the ear canal for the verification of hearing aid performance. Harford ER Ear Hear; 1980; 1(6):329-37. PubMed ID: 7439566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Remote probe microphone measurement to verify hearing aid performance. Ferrari DV; Bernardez-Braga GR J Telemed Telecare; 2009; 15(3):122-4. PubMed ID: 19364892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of probe tube reference placement on sound pressure level variability. Shotland LI; Hecox KE Ear Hear; 1990 Aug; 11(4):306-9. PubMed ID: 2210106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of probe insertion depth on real ear measurements. Dirks DD; Ahlstrom JB; Eisenberg LS Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1994 Jan; 110(1):64-74. PubMed ID: 8290304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The reliability of insertion gain measurements using probe microphones in the ear canal. Ringdahl A; Leijon A Scand Audiol; 1984; 13(3):173-8. PubMed ID: 6494803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]