These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17688892)

  • 21. Perceptual load affects spatial and nonspatial visual selection processes: an event-related brain potential study.
    Barnhardt J; Ritter W; Gomes H
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):2071-8. PubMed ID: 18355882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The course of visual searching to a target in a fixed location: electrophysiological evidence from an emotional flanker task.
    Dong G; Yang L; Shen Y
    Neurosci Lett; 2009 Aug; 460(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 19446605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The active inhibition for the processing of visual irrelevant conflict information.
    Mao W; Wang Y
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2008 Jan; 67(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 17999937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Observed effector-independent motor learning by observing.
    Williams A; Gribble PL
    J Neurophysiol; 2012 Mar; 107(6):1564-70. PubMed ID: 22190621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Position but not color deviants result in visual mismatch negativity in an active oddball task.
    Berti S
    Neuroreport; 2009 May; 20(7):702-7. PubMed ID: 19349916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Distraction of task-relevant information processing by irrelevant changes in auditory, visual, and bimodal stimulus features: a behavioral and event-related potential study.
    Boll S; Berti S
    Psychophysiology; 2009 May; 46(3):645-54. PubMed ID: 19386054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The planning of a sequence of saccades in pro- and antisaccade tasks: influence of visual integration time and concurrent motor processing.
    Lavergne L; Vergilino-Perez D; Collins T; Orriols E; Doré-Mazars K
    Brain Res; 2008 Dec; 1245():82-95. PubMed ID: 18929544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The case of pretense: observing actions and inferring goals.
    Schubotz RI; von Cramon DY
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 21(4):642-53. PubMed ID: 18564039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The "mosaic stage" in amodal completion as characterized by magnetoencephalography responses.
    Plomp G; Liu L; van Leeuwen C; Ioannides AA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Aug; 18(8):1394-405. PubMed ID: 16859423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The remains of the trial: goal-determined inter-trial suppression of selective attention.
    Lleras A; Levinthal BR; Kawahara J
    Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():195-213. PubMed ID: 19733758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Extremely selective attention: eye-tracking studies of the dynamic allocation of attention to stimulus features in categorization.
    Blair MR; Watson MR; Walshe RC; Maj F
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1196-206. PubMed ID: 19686015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Intention, attention and the temporal experience of action.
    Haggard P; Cole J
    Conscious Cogn; 2007 Jun; 16(2):211-20. PubMed ID: 16934490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of sound location on visual task performance and electrophysiological measures of distraction.
    Corral MJ; Escera C
    Neuroreport; 2008 Oct; 19(15):1535-9. PubMed ID: 18797312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Visual objects can potentiate a grasping neural simulation which interferes with manual response execution.
    Olivier G; Velay JL
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Feb; 130(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 19124117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Visual attention during the preparation of bimanual movements.
    Baldauf D; Deubel H
    Vision Res; 2008 Feb; 48(4):549-63. PubMed ID: 18206205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Mu wave suppression during the perception of meaningless syllables: EEG evidence of motor recruitment.
    Crawcour S; Bowers A; Harkrider A; Saltuklaroglu T
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Oct; 47(12):2558-63. PubMed ID: 19442676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Frontal attentional responses to food size are abnormal in obese subjects: an electroencephalographic study.
    Babiloni C; Del Percio C; Valenzano A; Marzano N; De Rosas M; Petito A; Bellomo A; Rossi G; Lecce B; Mundi C; Lizio R; Eusebi F; Cibelli G
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Aug; 120(8):1441-8. PubMed ID: 19616997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Directed and motivated attention during processing of natural scenes.
    Ferrari V; Codispoti M; Cardinale R; Bradley MM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Oct; 20(10):1753-61. PubMed ID: 18370595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Interlateral asymmetry in the time course of the effect of a peripheral prime stimulus.
    Castro-Barros BA; Righi LL; Grechi G; Ribeiro-do-Valle LE
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Apr; 66(3):265-79. PubMed ID: 17961895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Selective attention modulates inferior frontal gyrus activity during action observation.
    Chong TT; Williams MA; Cunnington R; Mattingley JB
    Neuroimage; 2008 Mar; 40(1):298-307. PubMed ID: 18178107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.