411 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17689568)
1. Prediction of a carcinogenic potential of rat hepatocarcinogens using toxicogenomics analysis of short-term in vivo studies.
Ellinger-Ziegelbauer H; Gmuender H; Bandenburg A; Ahr HJ
Mutat Res; 2008 Jan; 637(1-2):23-39. PubMed ID: 17689568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the expression profiles induced by genotoxic and nongenotoxic carcinogens in rat liver.
Ellinger-Ziegelbauer H; Stuart B; Wahle B; Bomann W; Ahr HJ
Mutat Res; 2005 Aug; 575(1-2):61-84. PubMed ID: 15890375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prediction model of potential hepatocarcinogenicity of rat hepatocarcinogens using a large-scale toxicogenomics database.
Uehara T; Minowa Y; Morikawa Y; Kondo C; Maruyama T; Kato I; Nakatsu N; Igarashi Y; Ono A; Hayashi H; Mitsumori K; Yamada H; Ohno Y; Urushidani T
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2011 Sep; 255(3):297-306. PubMed ID: 21784091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of hepatocarcinogen-induced gene expression profiles in conventional primary rat hepatocytes with in vivo rat liver.
Doktorova TY; Ellinger-Ziegelbauer H; Vinken M; Vanhaecke T; van Delft J; Kleinjans J; Ahr HJ; Rogiers V
Arch Toxicol; 2012 Sep; 86(9):1399-411. PubMed ID: 22484513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Characteristic expression profiles induced by genotoxic carcinogens in rat liver.
Ellinger-Ziegelbauer H; Stuart B; Wahle B; Bomann W; Ahr HJ
Toxicol Sci; 2004 Jan; 77(1):19-34. PubMed ID: 14600272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A toxicogenomics approach for early assessment of potential non-genotoxic hepatocarcinogenicity of chemicals in rats.
Uehara T; Hirode M; Ono A; Kiyosawa N; Omura K; Shimizu T; Mizukawa Y; Miyagishima T; Nagao T; Urushidani T
Toxicology; 2008 Aug; 250(1):15-26. PubMed ID: 18619722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens I. Sensitivity, specificity and relative predictivity.
Kirkland D; Aardema M; Henderson L; Müller L
Mutat Res; 2005 Jul; 584(1-2):1-256. PubMed ID: 15979392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Toxicogenomics discrimination of potential hepatocarcinogenicity of non-genotoxic compounds in rat liver.
Yamada F; Sumida K; Uehara T; Morikawa Y; Yamada H; Urushidani T; Ohno Y
J Appl Toxicol; 2013 Nov; 33(11):1284-93. PubMed ID: 22806939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prediction of carcinogenic potential by a toxicogenomic approach using rat hepatoma cells.
Tsujimura K; Asamoto M; Suzuki S; Hokaiwado N; Ogawa K; Shirai T
Cancer Sci; 2006 Oct; 97(10):1002-10. PubMed ID: 16918996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of transcriptomic and metabonomic technologies for identifying biomarkers predictive of two-year rodent cancer bioassays.
Thomas RS; O'Connell TM; Pluta L; Wolfinger RD; Yang L; Page TJ
Toxicol Sci; 2007 Mar; 96(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 17114358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Characterizing and predicting carcinogenicity and mode of action using conventional and toxicogenomics methods.
Waters MD; Jackson M; Lea I
Mutat Res; 2010 Dec; 705(3):184-200. PubMed ID: 20399889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Finding transcriptomics biomarkers for in vivo identification of (non-)genotoxic carcinogens using wild-type and Xpa/p53 mutant mouse models.
Jonker MJ; Bruning O; van Iterson M; Schaap MM; van der Hoeven TV; Vrieling H; Beems RB; de Vries A; van Steeg H; Breit TM; Luijten M
Carcinogenesis; 2009 Oct; 30(10):1805-12. PubMed ID: 19696161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative analysis of predictive models for nongenotoxic hepatocarcinogenicity using both toxicogenomics and quantitative structure-activity relationships.
Liu Z; Kelly R; Fang H; Ding D; Tong W
Chem Res Toxicol; 2011 Jul; 24(7):1062-70. PubMed ID: 21627106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predictive toxicogenomics approaches reveal underlying molecular mechanisms of nongenotoxic carcinogenicity.
Nie AY; McMillian M; Parker JB; Leone A; Bryant S; Yieh L; Bittner A; Nelson J; Carmen A; Wan J; Lord PG
Mol Carcinog; 2006 Dec; 45(12):914-33. PubMed ID: 16921489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens II. Further analysis of mammalian cell results, relative predictivity and tumour profiles.
Kirkland D; Aardema M; Müller L; Makoto H
Mutat Res; 2006 Sep; 608(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 16769241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development and evaluation of a genomic signature for the prediction and mechanistic assessment of nongenotoxic hepatocarcinogens in the rat.
Fielden MR; Adai A; Dunn RT; Olaharski A; Searfoss G; Sina J; Aubrecht J; Boitier E; Nioi P; Auerbach S; Jacobson-Kram D; Raghavan N; Yang Y; Kincaid A; Sherlock J; Chen SJ; Car B;
Toxicol Sci; 2011 Nov; 124(1):54-74. PubMed ID: 21813463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prediction of non-genotoxic carcinogenesis in rats using changes in gene expression following acute dosing.
Nioi P; Pardo ID; Sherratt PJ; Snyder RD
Chem Biol Interact; 2008 Apr; 172(3):206-15. PubMed ID: 18328469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Identification of potential biomarkers of genotoxicity and carcinogenicity in L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells by cDNA microarray analysis.
Kim JY; Kwon J; Kim JE; Koh WS; Chung MK; Yoon S; Song CW; Lee M
Environ Mol Mutagen; 2005; 45(1):80-9. PubMed ID: 15612046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An improved model of predicting hepatocarcinogenic potential in rats by using gene expression data.
Yamada F; Sumida K; Saito K
J Appl Toxicol; 2016 Feb; 36(2):296-308. PubMed ID: 26198598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Application of toxicogenomics to study mechanisms of genotoxicity and carcinogenicity.
Ellinger-Ziegelbauer H; Aubrecht J; Kleinjans JC; Ahr HJ
Toxicol Lett; 2009 Apr; 186(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 18822359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
