136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17689814)
1. ICD-10 adaptations of the Ontario acute myocardial infarction mortality prediction rules performed as well as the original versions.
Vermeulen MJ; Tu JV; Schull MJ
J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Sep; 60(9):971-4. PubMed ID: 17689814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Specific comorbidity risk adjustment was a better predictor of 5-year acute myocardial infarction mortality than general methods.
Grunau GL; Sheps S; Goldner EM; Ratner PA
J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Mar; 59(3):274-80. PubMed ID: 16488358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk adjustment performance of Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidities in ICD-9 and ICD-10 administrative databases.
Li B; Evans D; Faris P; Dean S; Quan H
BMC Health Serv Res; 2008 Jan; 8():12. PubMed ID: 18194561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stroke: the Elixhauser Index for comorbidity adjustment of in-hospital case fatality.
Zhu H; Hill MD
Neurology; 2008 Jul; 71(4):283-7. PubMed ID: 18645167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cross-national comparative performance of three versions of the ICD-10 Charlson index.
Sundararajan V; Quan H; Halfon P; Fushimi K; Luthi JC; Burnand B; Ghali WA;
Med Care; 2007 Dec; 45(12):1210-5. PubMed ID: 18007172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Charlson scores based on ICD-10 administrative data were valid in assessing comorbidity in patients undergoing urological cancer surgery.
Nuttall M; van der Meulen J; Emberton M
J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Mar; 59(3):265-73. PubMed ID: 16488357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Present-at-admission diagnoses improved mortality risk adjustment among acute myocardial infarction patients.
Stukenborg GJ; Wagner DP; Harrell FE; Oliver MN; Heim SW; Price AL; Han CK; Wolf AM; Connors AF
J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Feb; 60(2):142-54. PubMed ID: 17208120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. ICD-10 coding algorithms for defining comorbidities of acute myocardial infarction.
So L; Evans D; Quan H
BMC Health Serv Res; 2006 Dec; 6():161. PubMed ID: 17173686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. TMPM-ICD9: a trauma mortality prediction model based on ICD-9-CM codes.
Glance LG; Osler TM; Mukamel DB; Meredith W; Wagner J; Dick AW
Ann Surg; 2009 Jun; 249(6):1032-9. PubMed ID: 19474696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimal timing of coronary artery bypass after acute myocardial infarction: a review of California discharge data.
Weiss ES; Chang DD; Joyce DL; Nwakanma LU; Yuh DD
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Mar; 135(3):503-11, 511.e1-3. PubMed ID: 18329460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Impact of comorbidities on in-hospital mortality from acute myocardial infarction, 2003-2009].
Gili M; Sala J; López J; Carrión A; Béjar L; Moreno J; Rosales A; Sánchez G
Rev Esp Cardiol; 2011 Dec; 64(12):1130-7. PubMed ID: 22018686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is the Charlson Comorbidity Index useful for predicting trauma outcomes?
Gabbe BJ; Magtengaard K; Hannaford AP; Cameron PA
Acad Emerg Med; 2005 Apr; 12(4):318-21. PubMed ID: 15805322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Equally valid models gave divergent predictions for mortality in acute myocardial infarction patients in a comparison of logistic [corrected] regression models.
Steyerberg EW; Eijkemans MJ; Boersma E; Habbema JD
J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Apr; 58(4):383-90. PubMed ID: 15862724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Regional differences in process of care and outcomes for older acute myocardial infarction patients in the United States and Ontario, Canada.
Ko DT; Krumholz HM; Wang Y; Foody JM; Masoudi FA; Havranek EP; You JJ; Alter DA; Stukel TA; Newman AM; Tu JV
Circulation; 2007 Jan; 115(2):196-203. PubMed ID: 17190861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Positive predictive value of ICD-9 codes 410 and 411 in the identification of cases of acute coronary syndromes in the Saskatchewan Hospital automated database.
Varas-Lorenzo C; Castellsague J; Stang MR; Tomas L; Aguado J; Perez-Gutthann S
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2008 Aug; 17(8):842-52. PubMed ID: 18498081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Missed diagnosis of the diagnosis codes: comparison of International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision coding and ST- versus non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction diagnosis in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction.
Steinberg BA; French WJ; Peterson ED; Frederick PD; Cannon CP;
Crit Pathw Cardiol; 2006 Mar; 5(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 18340219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Relation of mortality to failure to prescribe beta blockers acutely in patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation following acute myocardial infarction (from the VALsartan In Acute myocardial iNfarcTion trial [VALIANT] Registry).
Piccini JP; Hranitzky PM; Kilaru R; Rouleau JL; White HD; Aylward PE; Van de Werf F; Solomon SD; Califf RM; Velazquez EJ
Am J Cardiol; 2008 Dec; 102(11):1427-32. PubMed ID: 19026290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is coding for myocardial infarction more accurate now that coding descriptions have been clarified to distinguish ST-elevation myocardial infarction from non-ST elevation myocardial infarction?
Steinberg BA; French WJ; Peterson E; Frederick PD; Cannon CP;
Am J Cardiol; 2008 Sep; 102(5):513-7. PubMed ID: 18721504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The impact of injury coding schemes on predicting hospital mortality after pediatric injury.
Burd RS; Madigan D
Acad Emerg Med; 2009 Jul; 16(7):639-45. PubMed ID: 19549015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Development and validation of the Ontario acute myocardial infarction mortality prediction rules.
Tu JV; Austin PC; Walld R; Roos L; Agras J; McDonald KM
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2001 Mar; 37(4):992-7. PubMed ID: 11263626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
