226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17689851)
1. Tiered toxicity testing: evaluation of toxicity-based decision triggers for human health hazard characterization.
Becker RA; Plunkett LM; Borzelleca JF; Kaplan AM
Food Chem Toxicol; 2007 Dec; 45(12):2454-69. PubMed ID: 17689851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An enhanced tiered toxicity testing framework with triggers for assessing hazards and risks of commodity chemicals.
Plunkett LM; Kaplan AM; Becker RA
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010 Dec; 58(3):382-94. PubMed ID: 20709129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Tiered chemical testing: a value of information approach.
Yokota F; Gray G; Hammitt JK; Thompson KM
Risk Anal; 2004 Dec; 24(6):1625-39. PubMed ID: 15660617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Alternative methods to safety studies in experimental animals: role in the risk assessment of chemicals under the new European Chemicals Legislation (REACH).
Lilienblum W; Dekant W; Foth H; Gebel T; Hengstler JG; Kahl R; Kramer PJ; Schweinfurth H; Wollin KM
Arch Toxicol; 2008 Apr; 82(4):211-36. PubMed ID: 18322675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The integrated project ReProTect: a novel approach in reproductive toxicity hazard assessment.
Hareng L; Pellizzer C; Bremer S; Schwarz M; Hartung T
Reprod Toxicol; 2005; 20(3):441-52. PubMed ID: 15899576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Economic benefits of using adaptive predictive models of reproductive toxicity in the context of a tiered testing program.
Martin MT; Knudsen TB; Judson RS; Kavlock RJ; Dix DJ
Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2012 Feb; 58(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 22239076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Critical aspects in reproductive and developmental toxicity testing of environmental chemicals.
Buschmann J
Reprod Toxicol; 2006 Aug; 22(2):157-63. PubMed ID: 16782303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. SIDS reprotoxicity screening test update: testing strategies and use.
Gelbke HP; Fleig H; Meder M;
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2004 Apr; 39(2):81-6. PubMed ID: 15041141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The enhancement of the subacute repeat dose toxicity test OECD TG 407 for the detection of endocrine active chemicals: comparison with toxicity tests of longer duration.
Gelbke HP; Hofmann A; Owens JW; Freyberger A
Arch Toxicol; 2007 Apr; 81(4):227-50. PubMed ID: 17047927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Integrated decision-tree testing strategies for developmental and reproductive toxicity with respect to the requirements of the EU REACH legislation.
Grindon C; Combes R; Cronin MT; Roberts DW; Garrod JF
Altern Lab Anim; 2008 Feb; 36(1):65-80. PubMed ID: 18333715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Towards a theory of tiered testing.
Hansson SO; Rudén C
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2007 Jun; 48(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 17289235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of protein safety in the context of agricultural biotechnology.
Delaney B; Astwood JD; Cunny H; Conn RE; Herouet-Guicheney C; Macintosh S; Meyer LS; Privalle L; Gao Y; Mattsson J; Levine M;
Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 May; 46 Suppl 2():S71-97. PubMed ID: 18348900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Perspective of predictive toxicity assessment of in vivo repeated dose toxicity using structural activity relationship].
Ono A
Kokuritsu Iyakuhin Shokuhin Eisei Kenkyusho Hokoku; 2010; (128):44-9. PubMed ID: 21381395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. VCCEP pilot: progress on evaluating children's risks and data needs.
Williams PR; Patterson J; Briggs DW
Risk Anal; 2006 Jun; 26(3):781-801. PubMed ID: 16834634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Determining acute health hazard ratings in the absence of applicable toxicological data.
Simmons F; Quigley D; Freshwater D; Whyte H; Boada-Clista L; Laul JC
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Nov; 4(11):841-7. PubMed ID: 17885911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vitro dermal absorption rate testing of certain chemicals of interest to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration: summary and evaluation of USEPA's mandated testing.
Fasano WJ; McDougal JN
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Jul; 51(2):181-94. PubMed ID: 18501488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An overall strategy for the testing of chemicals for human hazard and risk assessment under the EU REACH system.
Combes R; Barratt M; Balls M
Altern Lab Anim; 2006 Mar; 34 Suppl 1():15-27. PubMed ID: 16555957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Chemical testing strategies for predicting health hazards to children.
Lamb JC; Brown SM
Reprod Toxicol; 2000; 14(2):83-94. PubMed ID: 10825671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Health effects classification and its role in the derivation of minimal risk levels: developmental effects.
Pohl HR; Smith-Simon C; Hicks H
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1998 Aug; 28(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 9784433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
