88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1769012)
1. Electric field stimulation of human osteosarcoma-derived cells: a dose-response study.
Naegele RJ; Lipari J; Chakkalakal D; Strates B; McGuire M
Cancer Biochem Biophys; 1991 Aug; 12(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 1769012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation of MG63 osteoblast-like cells affects differentiation and local factor production.
Lohmann CH; Schwartz Z; Liu Y; Guerkov H; Dean DD; Simon B; Boyan BD
J Orthop Res; 2000 Jul; 18(4):637-46. PubMed ID: 11052501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Low-amplitude, low-frequency electric field-stimulated bone cell proliferation may in part be mediated by increased IGF-II release.
Fitzsimmons RJ; Strong DD; Mohan S; Baylink DJ
J Cell Physiol; 1992 Jan; 150(1):84-9. PubMed ID: 1730789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Electric fields and proliferation in a chronic wound model.
Goldman R; Pollack S
Bioelectromagnetics; 1996; 17(6):450-7. PubMed ID: 8986362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Frequency dependence of increased cell proliferation, in vitro, in exposures to a low-amplitude, low-frequency electric field: evidence for dependence on increased mitogen activity released into culture medium.
Fitzsimmons RJ; Farley JR; Adey WR; Baylink DJ
J Cell Physiol; 1989 Jun; 139(3):586-91. PubMed ID: 2738103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. DC electric fields induce rapid directional migration in cultured human corneal epithelial cells.
Farboud B; Nuccitelli R; Schwab IR; Isseroff RR
Exp Eye Res; 2000 May; 70(5):667-73. PubMed ID: 10870525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Re-orientation and faster, directed migration of lens epithelial cells in a physiological electric field.
Wang E; Zhao M; Forrester JV; MCCaig CD
Exp Eye Res; 2000 Jul; 71(1):91-8. PubMed ID: 10880279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro bone-cell response to a capacitively coupled electrical field. The role of field strength, pulse pattern, and duty cycle.
Brighton CT; Okereke E; Pollack SR; Clark CC
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Dec; (285):255-62. PubMed ID: 1446447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Application of direct current electric fields to cells and tissues in vitro and modulation of wound electric field in vivo.
Song B; Gu Y; Pu J; Reid B; Zhao Z; Zhao M
Nat Protoc; 2007; 2(6):1479-89. PubMed ID: 17545984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Input-output relationship in galvanotactic response of Dictyostelium cells.
Sato MJ; Ueda M; Takagi H; Watanabe TM; Yanagida T; Ueda M
Biosystems; 2007 Apr; 88(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 17184899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The control of neural cell-to-cell interactions through non-contact electrical field stimulation using graphene electrodes.
Heo C; Yoo J; Lee S; Jo A; Jung S; Yoo H; Lee YH; Suh M
Biomaterials; 2011 Jan; 32(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 20880583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sulfonated polyaniline-based organic electrodes for controlled electrical stimulation of human osteosarcoma cells.
Min Y; Yang Y; Poojari Y; Liu Y; Wu JC; Hansford DJ; Epstein AJ
Biomacromolecules; 2013 Jun; 14(6):1727-31. PubMed ID: 23600698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dynamic changes in traction forces with DC electric field in osteoblast-like cells.
Curtze S; Dembo M; Miron M; Jones DB
J Cell Sci; 2004 Jun; 117(Pt 13):2721-9. PubMed ID: 15150319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Exposure of human leukemic cells to direct electric current: generation of toxic compounds inducing cell death by different mechanisms.
Veiga VF; Nimrichter L; Teixeira CA; Morales MM; Alviano CS; Rodrigues ML; Holandino C
Cell Biochem Biophys; 2005; 42(1):61-74. PubMed ID: 15673929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Directed cell movement: a biophysical analysis.
Gruler H
Blood Cells; 1993; 19(1):91-110; discussion 110-3. PubMed ID: 8400316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Directed migration and morphological changes of cultured trophoblast cells in small electric fields].
Luo XF; Huang Y; Fan P; Peng B; Liu R; Bai H
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2010 Sep; 41(5):771-4, 802. PubMed ID: 21302438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of a 50 Hz sinusoidal magnetic field on cell adhesion molecule expression in two human osteosarcoma cell lines (MG-63 and Saos-2).
Santini MT; Rainaldi G; Ferrante A; Indovina PL; Vecchia P; Donelli G
Bioelectromagnetics; 2003 Jul; 24(5):327-38. PubMed ID: 12820290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. 60-Hz electric fields inhibit protein kinase C activity and multidrug resistance gene (MDR1) up-regulation.
Walter RJ; Shtil AA; Roninson IB; Holian O
Radiat Res; 1997 Mar; 147(3):369-75. PubMed ID: 9052685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Involvement of chemokine receptor 4/stromal cell-derived factor 1 system during osteosarcoma tumor progression.
Perissinotto E; Cavalloni G; Leone F; Fonsato V; Mitola S; Grignani G; Surrenti N; Sangiolo D; Bussolino F; Piacibello W; Aglietta M
Clin Cancer Res; 2005 Jan; 11(2 Pt 1):490-7. PubMed ID: 15701832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Responses of human MG-63 osteosarcoma cell line and human osteoblast-like cells to pulsed electromagnetic fields.
Sollazzo V; Traina GC; DeMattei M; Pellati A; Pezzetti F; Caruso A
Bioelectromagnetics; 1997; 18(8):541-7. PubMed ID: 9383242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
