248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17690936)
1. Robot-assisted vs. conventional laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a comparative study on costs and time.
Heemskerk J; de Hoog DE; van Gemert WG; Baeten CG; Greve JW; Bouvy ND
Dis Colon Rectum; 2007 Nov; 50(11):1825-30. PubMed ID: 17690936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Long-term outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse.
Perrenot C; Germain A; Scherrer ML; Ayav A; Brunaud L; Bresler L
Dis Colon Rectum; 2013 Jul; 56(7):909-14. PubMed ID: 23739199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: a comparative retrospective study on costs and time consumption.
Heemskerk J; van Gemert WG; Greve JW; Bouvy ND
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2007 Feb; 17(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 17318044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Day case robotic ventral rectopexy compared with day case laparoscopic ventral rectopexy: a prospective study.
Faucheron JL; Trilling B; Barbois S; Sage PY; Waroquet PA; Reche F
Tech Coloproctol; 2016 Oct; 20(10):695-700. PubMed ID: 27530905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robot-assisted vs laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for external or internal rectal prolapse and enterocele: a randomized controlled trial.
Mäkelä-Kaikkonen J; Rautio T; Pääkkö E; Biancari F; Ohtonen P; Mäkelä J
Colorectal Dis; 2016 Oct; 18(10):1010-1015. PubMed ID: 26919191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of open vs. laparoscopic abdominal rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse: a meta-analysis.
Purkayastha S; Tekkis P; Athanasiou T; Aziz O; Paraskevas P; Ziprin P; Darzi A
Dis Colon Rectum; 2005 Oct; 48(10):1930-40. PubMed ID: 15981060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Increased cost burden associated with robot-assisted rectopexy: do patient outcomes justify increased expenditure?
Wlodarczyk J; Brabender D; Gupta A; Gaur K; Madiedo A; Lee SW; Hsieh C
Surg Endosc; 2023 Mar; 37(3):2119-2126. PubMed ID: 36315284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is robotic-assisted ventral mesh rectopexy superior to laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy in the management of obstructed defaecation?
Mantoo S; Podevin J; Regenet N; Rigaud J; Lehur PA; Meurette G
Colorectal Dis; 2013 Aug; 15(8):e469-75. PubMed ID: 23895633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Learning curves of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery: an experimental study evaluating skill acquisition of robot-assisted laparoscopic tasks compared with conventional laparoscopic tasks in inexperienced users.
Heemskerk J; van Gemert WG; de Vries J; Greve J; Bouvy ND
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2007 Jun; 17(3):171-4. PubMed ID: 17581459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robot-assisted or conventional laparoscoic rectopexy for rectal prolapse? Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Rondelli F; Bugiantella W; Villa F; Sanguinetti A; Boni M; Mariani E; Avenia N
Int J Surg; 2014; 12 Suppl 2():S153-S159. PubMed ID: 25157988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Laparoscopic management of persistent complete rectal prolapse in children.
Ismail M; Gabr K; Shalaby R
J Pediatr Surg; 2010 Mar; 45(3):533-9. PubMed ID: 20223316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robot-assisted rectopexy is a safe and feasible option for treatment of rectal prolapse.
Haahr C; Jakobsen HL; Gögenur I
Dan Med J; 2014 May; 61(5):A4842. PubMed ID: 24814744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-term functional outcomes after laparoscopic and open rectopexy for the treatment of rectal prolapse.
Byrne CM; Smith SR; Solomon MJ; Young JM; Eyers AA; Young CJ
Dis Colon Rectum; 2008 Nov; 51(11):1597-604. PubMed ID: 18758861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.
Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robot-Assisted Ventral Mesh Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse: A 5-Year Experience at a Tertiary Referral Center.
van Iersel JJ; Formijne Jonkers HA; Paulides TJC; Verheijen PM; Draaisma WA; Consten ECJ; Broeders IAMJ
Dis Colon Rectum; 2017 Nov; 60(11):1215-1223. PubMed ID: 28991087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term outcome of robotic-assisted laparoscopic rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse in elderly patients.
Germain A; Perrenot C; Scherrer ML; Ayav C; Brunaud L; Ayav A; Bresler L
Colorectal Dis; 2014 Mar; 16(3):198-202. PubMed ID: 24308488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Economic impact of laparoscopic versus open abdominal rectopexy.
Salkeld G; Bagia M; Solomon M
Br J Surg; 2004 Sep; 91(9):1188-91. PubMed ID: 15449272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Laparoscopically-assisted resection rectopexy for rectal prolapse: ten years' experience.
Ashari LH; Lumley JW; Stevenson AR; Stitz RW
Dis Colon Rectum; 2005 May; 48(5):982-7. PubMed ID: 15785889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robotic-assisted and laparoscopic ventral rectopexy in the treatment of rectal prolapse: a matched-pairs study of operative details and complications.
Mäkelä-Kaikkonen J; Rautio T; Klintrup K; Takala H; Vierimaa M; Ohtonen P; Mäkelä J
Tech Coloproctol; 2014 Feb; 18(2):151-5. PubMed ID: 23839795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Technical modifications for cost optimization in robot-assisted ventral mesh rectopexy: an initial experience.
Marra AA; Campennì P; De Simone V; Parello A; Litta F; Ratto C
Tech Coloproctol; 2023 Jul; 27(7):551-557. PubMed ID: 36802041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
