These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17691449)

  • 21. Evaluation of the radial artery applanation tonometry technology for continuous noninvasive blood pressure monitoring compared with central aortic blood pressure measurements in patients with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome.
    Meidert AS; Huber W; Hapfelmeier A; Schöfthaler M; Müller JN; Langwieser N; Wagner JY; Schmid RM; Saugel B
    J Crit Care; 2013 Dec; 28(6):908-12. PubMed ID: 23910893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Noninvasive measurement of central vascular pressures with arterial tonometry: clinical revival of the pulse pressure waveform?
    Nelson MR; Stepanek J; Cevette M; Covalciuc M; Hurst RT; Tajik AJ
    Mayo Clin Proc; 2010 May; 85(5):460-72. PubMed ID: 20435839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Arterial pressure waveforms in hypertension.
    O'Rourke MF
    Minerva Med; 2003 Aug; 94(4):229-50. PubMed ID: 14605588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Indices of pulse wave analysis are better predictors of left ventricular mass reduction than cuff pressure.
    Hashimoto J; Imai Y; O'Rourke MF
    Am J Hypertens; 2007 Apr; 20(4):378-84. PubMed ID: 17386343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Estimation of central pressure augmentation using automated radial artery tonometry.
    Melenovsky V; Borlaug BA; Fetics B; Kessler K; Shively L; Kass DA
    J Hypertens; 2007 Jul; 25(7):1403-9. PubMed ID: 17563562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Different influences on central and peripheral pulse pressure, aortic wave reflections and pulse wave velocity of three different types of antihypertensive drugs.
    Polónia J; Barbosa L; Silva JA; Maldonado J
    Rev Port Cardiol; 2003 Dec; 22(12):1485-92. PubMed ID: 15008064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Non-invasive determination of instantaneous brachial blood flow using the oscillometric method.
    Liu SH; Wang JJ; Cheng DC
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2009 Aug; 54(4):171-7. PubMed ID: 19807282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Central hemodynamics could explain the inverse association between height and cardiovascular mortality.
    Reeve JC; Abhayaratna WP; Davies JE; Sharman JE
    Am J Hypertens; 2014 Mar; 27(3):392-400. PubMed ID: 24304657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Non-invasive model-based estimation of aortic pulse pressure using suprasystolic brachial pressure waveforms.
    Lowe A; Harrison W; El-Aklouk E; Ruygrok P; Al-Jumaily AM
    J Biomech; 2009 Sep; 42(13):2111-5. PubMed ID: 19665136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Estimation of central aortic pressure waveform by mathematical transformation of radial tonometry pressure. Validation of generalized transfer function.
    Chen CH; Nevo E; Fetics B; Pak PH; Yin FC; Maughan WL; Kass DA
    Circulation; 1997 Apr; 95(7):1827-36. PubMed ID: 9107170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Pulse wave analysis and pulse wave velocity: a critical review of their strengths and weaknesses.
    Davies JI; Struthers AD
    J Hypertens; 2003 Mar; 21(3):463-72. PubMed ID: 12640232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Central arterial pressure and arterial pressure pulse: new views entering the second century after Korotkov.
    O'Rourke MF; Seward JB
    Mayo Clin Proc; 2006 Aug; 81(8):1057-68. PubMed ID: 16901029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Differential impact of blood pressure-lowering drugs on central aortic pressure and clinical outcomes: principal results of the Conduit Artery Function Evaluation (CAFE) study.
    Williams B; Lacy PS; Thom SM; Cruickshank K; Stanton A; Collier D; Hughes AD; Thurston H; O'Rourke M; ; ;
    Circulation; 2006 Mar; 113(9):1213-25. PubMed ID: 16476843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Assessing the Accuracy of Systolic Aortic Pressure Estimation From a Brachial Cuff Alone: A Comparison With Radial Tonometry.
    Chemla D; Agnoletti D; Attal P; Millasseau S; Blacher J; Jozwiak M
    Am J Hypertens; 2024 Jul; 37(8):549-553. PubMed ID: 38517132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Validity of a new method to estimate mean arterial pressure at brachial level.
    Graf S; Craiem D; Armentano RL
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():2861-4. PubMed ID: 21095973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cuff and aortic pressure differences during dobutamine infusion: a study of the effects of systolic blood pressure amplification.
    Smulyan H; Mukherjee R; Sheehe PR; Safar ME
    Am Heart J; 2010 Mar; 159(3):399-405. PubMed ID: 20211301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Validation of the transfer function technique for generating central from peripheral upper limb pressure waveform.
    Gallagher D; Adji A; O'Rourke MF
    Am J Hypertens; 2004 Nov; 17(11 Pt 1):1059-67. PubMed ID: 15533735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Arterial stiffening and vascular/ventricular interaction.
    O'Rourke M
    J Hum Hypertens; 1994 Sep; 8 Suppl 1():S9-15. PubMed ID: 7807513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Amplitude and timing of central aortic pressure wave reflections in heart transplant recipients.
    Schofield RS; Schuler BT; Edwards DG; Aranda JM; Hill JA; Nichols WW
    Am J Hypertens; 2002 Sep; 15(9):809-15. PubMed ID: 12219877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Estimation of central systolic blood pressure using an oscillometric blood pressure monitor.
    Cheng HM; Wang KL; Chen YH; Lin SJ; Chen LC; Sung SH; Ding PY; Yu WC; Chen JW; Chen CH
    Hypertens Res; 2010 Jun; 33(6):592-9. PubMed ID: 20339373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.