273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17692701)
1. Two-dimensional cephalometry and computerized orthognathic surgical treatment planning.
Kusnoto B
Clin Plast Surg; 2007 Jul; 34(3):417-26. PubMed ID: 17692701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Three-dimensional computerized orthognathic surgical treatment planning.
Alves PV; Bolognese AM; Zhao L
Clin Plast Surg; 2007 Jul; 34(3):427-36. PubMed ID: 17692702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reliability of computer-generated cephalometrics.
Nimkarn Y; Miles PG
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1995; 10(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 9081992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of cephalometric measurements with digital versus conventional cephalometric analysis.
Celik E; Polat-Ozsoy O; Toygar Memikoglu TU
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 19237509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of combined maxillary and mandibular repositioning and of soft tissue prediction in relation to maxillary antero-superior repositioning combined with mandibular set back A computerized cephalometric evaluation of the immediate postsurgical outcome using the TIOPS planning system.
Donatsky O; Bjørn-Jørgensen J; Hermund NU; Nielsen H; Holmqvist-Larsen M; Nerder PH
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 37(5):279-84. PubMed ID: 19188076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Surgical prediction reliability: a comparison of two computer software systems.
Aharon PA; Eisig S; Cisneros GJ
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1997; 12(1):65-78. PubMed ID: 9456619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing digital and conventional cephalometric radiographs.
Cohen JM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Aug; 128(2):157-60. PubMed ID: 16102396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differences in cephalometric measurements: a comparison of digital versus hand-tracing methods.
Polat-Ozsoy O; Gokcelik A; Toygar Memikoglu TU
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):254-9. PubMed ID: 19349417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A radiographic analysis of computer prediction in conjunction with orthognathic surgery.
Loh S; Heng JK; Ward-Booth P; Winchester L; McDonald F
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Aug; 30(4):259-63. PubMed ID: 11518345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-dimensional facial morphometry and conventional cephalometrics: a correlation study.
Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Puleo A; Poggio CE; Schmitz JH
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1996; 11(4):329-38. PubMed ID: 9456609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prediction accuracy of soft tissue profile in orthognathic surgery.
Mankad B; Cisneros GJ; Freeman K; Eisig SB
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1999; 14(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 10337247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-dimensional fetal cephalometry: an evaluation of the reliability of cephalometric measurements based on three-dimensional CT reconstructions and on dry skulls of sheep fetuses.
Papadopoulos MA; Jannowitz C; Boettcher P; Henke J; Stolla R; Zeilhofer HF; Kovacs L; Erhardt W; Biemer E; Papadopulos NA
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2005 Aug; 33(4):229-37. PubMed ID: 15978824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparing digital serial cephalogram images for growth or treatment changes.
Ross LL; Munn MR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Aug; 128(2):161-2. PubMed ID: 16102397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [The study of automatic cephalometric analysis system].
Zhang X; Zhang Z; Zhang X
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1999 Mar; 34(2):76-9. PubMed ID: 11834164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Digital diagnostics: Three-dimensional modelling.
Singh GD
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jan; 46(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 17126456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of manual traced images and corresponding scanned radiographs digitally traced.
Naoumova J; Lindman R
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):247-53. PubMed ID: 19342425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A new three-dimensional method of assessing facial volumetric changes after orthognathic treatment.
Hajeer MY; Mao Z; Millett DT; Ayoub AF; Siebert JP
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2005 Mar; 42(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 15748101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Three-dimensional assessment of the facial soft tissue changes that occur postoperatively in orthognathic patients.
Day CJ; Robert T
World J Orthod; 2006; 7(1):15-26. PubMed ID: 16548302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Are collimated low-dose digital radiographs valid for performing Delaire's architectural analysis?
Stamm T; Meier N; Hohoff A; Meyer U; Heinecke A; Joos U
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Dec; 32(6):600-5. PubMed ID: 14636609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The accuracy of video imaging prediction in soft tissue outcome after bimaxillary orthognathic surgery.
Lu CH; Ko EW; Huang CS
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Mar; 61(3):333-42. PubMed ID: 12618973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
