These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1769354)

  • 1. Performance of on-line chemical property estimation methods with TSCA premanufacture notice chemicals.
    Lynch DG; Tirado NF; Boethling RS; Huse GR; Thom GC
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 1991 Oct; 22(2):240-9. PubMed ID: 1769354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation of CHEMEST, an on-line system for the estimation of chemical properties.
    Boethling RS; Campbell SE; Lynch DG; LaVeck GD
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 1988 Feb; 15(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 3359953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How accurate are physical property estimation programs for organosilicon compounds?
    Boethling R; Meylan W
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2013 Nov; 32(11):2433-40. PubMed ID: 23846858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mode of action and the assessment of chemical hazards in the presence of limited data: use of structure-activity relationships (SAR) under TSCA, Section 5.
    Auer CM; Nabholz JV; Baetcke KP
    Environ Health Perspect; 1990 Jul; 87():183-97. PubMed ID: 2269224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predicting ready biodegradability of premanufacture notice chemicals.
    Boethling RS; Lynch DG; Thom GC
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2003 Apr; 22(4):837-44. PubMed ID: 12685720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What industrial hygienists should know about TSCA.
    Lubs PL; Kerfoot EJ; McClellan JM
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1982 Jun; 43(6):418-22. PubMed ID: 7113922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Regulation of existing chemicals under TSCA: information disclosure as the route to reducing risk and increasing available data.
    Rosenthal I; Weiler ED; Keener RL; Cumberland PJ
    Qual Assur; 1992 Feb; 1(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 1344214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. History of EPI Suite™ and future perspectives on chemical property estimation in US Toxic Substances Control Act new chemical risk assessments.
    Card ML; Gomez-Alvarez V; Lee WH; Lynch DG; Orentas NS; Lee MT; Wong EM; Boethling RS
    Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2017 Mar; 19(3):203-212. PubMed ID: 28275775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Design of safer chemicals: an EPA goal.
    Baumel IP
    Drug Metab Rev; 1984; 15(3):415-24. PubMed ID: 6489159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Property Estimation of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances: A Comparative Assessment of Estimation Methods.
    Lampic A; Parnis JM
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2020 Apr; 39(4):775-786. PubMed ID: 32022323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The unsteady state and inertia of chemical regulation under the US Toxic Substances Control Act.
    Krimsky S
    PLoS Biol; 2017 Dec; 15(12):e2002404. PubMed ID: 29252997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Environmental hazard and risk assessment under the United States Toxic Substances Control Act.
    Nabholz JV
    Sci Total Environ; 1991 Dec; 109-110():649-65. PubMed ID: 1815379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In Silico Prediction of Physicochemical Properties of Environmental Chemicals Using Molecular Fingerprints and Machine Learning.
    Zang Q; Mansouri K; Williams AJ; Judson RS; Allen DG; Casey WM; Kleinstreuer NC
    J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Jan; 57(1):36-49. PubMed ID: 28006899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Regulating the introduction of new chemicals under section 5 of TSCA: improving the efficiency of the process and reducing potential injury in the workplace through the use of operational MSDS and exposure limits.
    Rosenthal I; Jayjock MA; Keener RL; Plamondon JE
    Qual Assur; 1991 Oct; 1(1):10-30. PubMed ID: 1669965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. QSPR prediction of physico-chemical properties for REACH.
    Dearden JC; Rotureau P; Fayet G
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2013; 24(4):279-318. PubMed ID: 23521394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. U.S. EPA regulatory perspectives on the use of QSAR for new and existing chemical evaluations.
    Zeeman M; Auer CM; Clements RG; Nabholz JV; Boethling RS
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 1995; 3(3):179-201. PubMed ID: 8564854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Toward a new U.S. chemicals policy: rebuilding the foundation to advance new science, green chemistry, and environmental health.
    Wilson MP; Schwarzman MR
    Environ Health Perspect; 2009 Aug; 117(8):1202-9. PubMed ID: 19672398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Temperature dependent properties of environmentally important synthetic musks.
    Paasivirta J; Sinkkonen S; Rantalainen AL; Broman D; Zebühr Y
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2002; 9(5):345-55. PubMed ID: 12391811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Application of the preliminary developmental toxicity screen for chemical hazard identification under the Toxic Substances Control Act.
    Francis EZ; Farland WH
    Teratog Carcinog Mutagen; 1987; 7(1):107-17. PubMed ID: 2884738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The application of structure-activity relationships (SARs) in the aquatic toxicity evaluation of discrete organic chemicals.
    Clements RG; Nabholz JV; Zeeman MG; Auer CM
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 1995; 3(3):203-15. PubMed ID: 8564855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.