These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17693969)

  • 21. Microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization analysis in neonates with congenital anomalies: detection of chromosomal imbalances.
    Emy Dorfman L; Leite JC; Giugliani R; Riegel M
    J Pediatr (Rio J); 2015; 91(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 25203518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. High resolution comparative genomic hybridisation analysis reveals imbalances in dyschromosomal patients with normal or apparently balanced conventional karyotypes.
    Kirchhoff M; Rose H; Maahr J; Gerdes T; Bugge M; Tommerup N; Tümer Z; Lespinasse J; Jensen PK; Wirth J; Lundsteen C
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2000 Sep; 8(9):661-8. PubMed ID: 10980571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Two different genetic analyses of spontaneously aborted specimen].
    Hu YL; Chen X; Chen LL; Zhu RF; Xu ZF; Wang ZQ; Zhu XH; Liu X
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Mar; 41(3):148-51. PubMed ID: 16640875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Identification of De Novo and Rare Inherited Copy Number Variants in Children with Syndromic Congenital Heart Defects.
    Hussein IR; Bader RS; Chaudhary AG; Bassiouni R; Alquaiti M; Ashgan F; Schulten HJ; Al Qahtani MH
    Pediatr Cardiol; 2018 Jun; 39(5):924-940. PubMed ID: 29541814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cytogenetic analysis of trophoblasts by comparative genomic hybridization in embryo-fetal development anomalies.
    Tabet AC; Aboura A; Dauge MC; Audibert F; Coulomb A; Batallan A; Couturier-Turpin MH; Feldmann G; Tachdjian G
    Prenat Diagn; 2001 Aug; 21(8):613-8. PubMed ID: 11536256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cytogenetic aberrations in myelodysplastic syndrome detected by comparative genomic hybridization and fluorescence in situ hybridization.
    Wilkens L; Burkhardt D; Tchinda J; Büsche G; Werner M; Nolte M; Ganser A; Georgii A
    Diagn Mol Pathol; 1999 Mar; 8(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 10408793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Analysis of chromosomal aberrations in patients with mental retardation using the array-CGH technique: a single Czech centre experience.
    Zrnová E; Vranová V; Slámová I; Gaillyová R; Kuglík P
    Folia Biol (Praha); 2011; 57(5):206-15. PubMed ID: 22123463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparative genomic hybridization: a new tool for reproductive pathology.
    Barrett IJ; Lomax BL; Loukianova T; Tang SS; Lestou VS; Kalousek DK
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2001 Jan; 125(1):81-4. PubMed ID: 11151058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Prenatal genomic profiling of abdominal wall defects through comparative genomic hybridization: perspectives for a new diagnostic tool.
    Heinrich JK; Machado IN; Vivas L; Bianchi MO; Cursino Andrade K; Sbragia L; Barini R
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2007; 22(5):361-4. PubMed ID: 17556825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Reproductive oocyte/embryo genetic analysis: comparison between fluorescence in-situ hybridization and comparative genomic hybridization.
    Keskintepe L; Sher G; Keskintepe M
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2007 Sep; 15(3):303-9. PubMed ID: 17854528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparative genomic hybridization on single cells.
    Voullaire L; Wilton L
    Methods Mol Med; 2007; 132():101-15. PubMed ID: 17876079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Chromosomal microarray analysis in fetuses with aberrant right subclavian artery.
    Maya I; Kahana S; Yeshaya J; Tenne T; Yacobson S; Agmon-Fishman I; Cohen-Vig L; Levi A; Reinstein E; Basel-Vanagaite L; Sharony R
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Mar; 49(3):337-341. PubMed ID: 27063194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The cytogenetic view of standard comparative genomic hybridization (CGH): deletions of 20q in human leukemia as a measure of the sensitivity of the technique.
    Brecevic L; Verdorfer I; Saul W; Trautmann U; Gebhart E
    Anticancer Res; 2001; 21(1A):89-92. PubMed ID: 11299794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Prenatal diagnosis of a 9q34.3 microdeletion by array-CGH in a fetus with an apparently balanced translocation.
    Simovich MJ; Yatsenko SA; Kang SH; Cheung SW; Dudek ME; Pursley A; Ward PA; Patel A; Lupski JR
    Prenat Diagn; 2007 Dec; 27(12):1112-7. PubMed ID: 17849500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Matrix-based comparative genomic hybridization: biochips to screen for genomic imbalances.
    Solinas-Toldo S; Lampel S; Stilgenbauer S; Nickolenko J; Benner A; Döhner H; Cremer T; Lichter P
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 1997 Dec; 20(4):399-407. PubMed ID: 9408757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Patterns of aneuploidy in stage IV clear cell renal cell carcinoma revealed by comparative genomic hybridization and spectral karyotyping.
    Pavlovich CP; Padilla-Nash H; Wangsa D; Nickerson ML; Matrosova V; Linehan WM; Ried T; Phillips JL
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2003 Jul; 37(3):252-60. PubMed ID: 12759923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities using array-based comparative genomic hybridization.
    Sahoo T; Cheung SW; Ward P; Darilek S; Patel A; del Gaudio D; Kang SH; Lalani SR; Li J; McAdoo S; Burke A; Shaw CA; Stankiewicz P; Chinault AC; Van den Veyver IB; Roa BB; Beaudet AL; Eng CM
    Genet Med; 2006 Nov; 8(11):719-27. PubMed ID: 17108764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of comparative genomic hybridization with conventional karyotype and classical fluorescence in situ hybridization for prenatal and postnatal diagnosis of unbalanced chromosome abnormalities.
    Lapierre JM; Cacheux V; Collot N; Da Silva F; Hervy N; Rivet D; Romana S; Wiss J; Benzaken B; Aurias A; Tachdjian G
    Ann Genet; 1998; 41(3):133-40. PubMed ID: 9833066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparative genomic hybridization-aided unraveling of complex karyotypes in human hematopoietic neoplasias.
    Verdorfer I; Brecevic L; Saul W; Schenker B; Kirsch M; Trautmann U; Helm G; Gramatzki M; Gebhart E
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2001 Jan; 124(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 11165314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Delimiting the use of comparative genomic hybridization in human myeloid neoplastic disorders.
    Gebhart E; Verdorfer I; Saul W; Trautmann U; Brecevic L
    Int J Oncol; 2000 Jun; 16(6):1099-105. PubMed ID: 10811980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.