These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17694210)

  • 21. Comparison of the marginal adaptation of direct and indirect composite inlay restorations with optical coherence tomography.
    Türk AG; Sabuncu M; Ünal S; Önal B; Ulusoy M
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2016; 24(4):383-90. PubMed ID: 27556210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. IPS Empress inlays and onlays after four years--a clinical study.
    Krämer N; Frankenberger R; Pelka M; Petschelt A
    J Dent; 1999 Jul; 27(5):325-31. PubMed ID: 10377606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Two-year clinical evaluation of a self-adhesive luting agent for ceramic inlays.
    Peumans M; De Munck J; Van Landuyt K; Poitevin A; Lambrechts P; Van Meerbeek B
    J Adhes Dent; 2010 Apr; 12(2):151-61. PubMed ID: 20157666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Scientifically based rationale and protocol for use of modern indirect resin inlays and onlays.
    Blank JT
    J Esthet Dent; 2000; 12(4):195-208. PubMed ID: 11323863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Resin-modified glass ionomers for luting posterior ceramic restorations.
    Thonemann B; Federlin M; Schmalz G; Hiller KA
    Dent Mater; 1995 May; 11(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 8600007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Four-year clinical performance and marginal analysis of pressed glass ceramic inlays luted with ormocer restorative vs. conventional luting composite.
    Krämer N; Reinelt C; Richter G; Frankenberger R
    J Dent; 2009 Nov; 37(11):813-9. PubMed ID: 19744761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Tooth-colored inlays: new cementation technique.
    Zhukovsky L; Settembrini L; Epelboym D
    Gen Dent; 1997; 45(3):290-3. PubMed ID: 9515433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effect of three variables on shear bond strength when luting a resin inlay to dentin.
    Lee JI; Park SH
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(3):288-92. PubMed ID: 19544817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Adhesive cementation of chairside CAD/CAM inlays and onlays.
    Blatz MB; Ripps A; Sadan A; Holst S
    Dent Today; 2006 Jan; 25(1):60, 62-5; quiz 65. PubMed ID: 16471400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays luted with self-adhesive resin cement: a 2-year in vivo study.
    Taschner M; Krämer N; Lohbauer U; Pelka M; Breschi L; Petschelt A; Frankenberger R
    Dent Mater; 2012 May; 28(5):535-40. PubMed ID: 22236770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Aesthetic inlays and onlays: a clinical technique update.
    Jackson RD
    Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1993 Apr; 5(3):18-27; quiz 27. PubMed ID: 8593358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Clinical Evaluation of Indirect Composite Resin Restorations Cemented with Different Resin Cements.
    Marcondes M; Souza N; Manfroi FB; Burnett LH; Spohr AM
    J Adhes Dent; 2016; 18(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 26814319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Posterior restoration using laboratory-fabricated composite resin inlays/onlays.
    Lowe E; Rego NA
    Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 2000 Apr; 12(3):279-83. PubMed ID: 11404917
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays and onlays fabricated with two systems: two-year clinical follow up.
    Coelho Santos MJ; Mondelli RF; Lauris JR; Navarro MF
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 15088722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Marginal adaptation of a sintered ceramic inlay system before and after cementation.
    Gemalmaz D; Ozcan M; Yoruç AB; Alkumru HN
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Sep; 24(9):646-51. PubMed ID: 9357744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Short-term clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass-ionomer luting cement.
    Yoneda S; Morigami M; Sugizaki J; Yamada T
    Quintessence Int; 2005 Jan; 36(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 15709497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Considerations for the selection of a luting cement.
    Rickman LJ; Satterthwaite JD
    Dent Update; 2010 May; 37(4):247-8, 251-2, 255-6 passim. PubMed ID: 20527500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Microtensile bond strength of new self-adhesive luting agents and conventional multistep systems.
    Viotti RG; Kasaz A; Pena CE; Alexandre RS; Arrais CA; Reis AF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Nov; 102(5):306-12. PubMed ID: 19853172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The influence of a simplified application technique for ceramic inlays on the margin quality.
    Clotten S; Blunck U; Roulet JF
    J Adhes Dent; 1999; 1(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 11725681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Longevity of indirect restorations cemented with self-adhesive resin luting with and without selective enamel etching. A Systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Solon-de-Mello M; da Silva Fidalgo TK; Dos Santos Letieri A; Masterson D; Granjeiro JM; Monte Alto RV; Maia LC
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2019 Jul; 31(4):327-337. PubMed ID: 31207007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.