These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17694214)

  • 1. Two-year clinical evaluation of Cerec 3D ceramic inlays inserted by undergraduate dental students.
    Wrbas KT; Hein N; Schirrmeister JF; Altenburger MJ; Hellwig E
    Quintessence Int; 2007; 38(7):575-81. PubMed ID: 17694214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. All-ceramic partial coverage restorations--midterm results of a 5-year prospective clinical splitmouth study.
    Guess PC; Strub JR; Steinhart N; Wolkewitz M; Stappert CF
    J Dent; 2009 Aug; 37(8):627-37. PubMed ID: 19477570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computer-aided direct ceramic restorations: a 10-year prospective clinical study of Cerec CAD/CAM inlays and onlays.
    Otto T; De Nisco S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 11951800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long-term clinical results of chairside Cerec CAD/CAM inlays and onlays: a case series.
    Otto T; Schneider D
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 18350948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Polymer-infiltrated ceramic CAD/CAM inlays and partial coverage restorations: 3-year results of a prospective clinical study over 5 years.
    Spitznagel FA; Scholz KJ; Strub JR; Vach K; Gierthmuehlen PC
    Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Jun; 22(5):1973-1983. PubMed ID: 29214376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the clinical success of Cerec 3D inlays.
    Bernhart J; Schulze D; Wrbas KT
    Int J Comput Dent; 2009; 12(3):265-77. PubMed ID: 19715150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Marginal gap, internal fit, and fracture load of leucite-reinforced ceramic inlays fabricated by CEREC inLab and hot-pressed techniques.
    Keshvad A; Hooshmand T; Asefzadeh F; Khalilinejad F; Alihemmati M; Van Noort R
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Oct; 20(7):535-40. PubMed ID: 21806704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Preliminary clinical results of a prospective study of IPS e.max Press- and Cerec ProCAD- partial coverage crowns].
    Guess PC; Stappert CF; Strub JR
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2006; 116(5):493-500. PubMed ID: 16792054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The clinical performance of CAD/CAM-generated composite inlays.
    Fasbinder DJ; Dennison JB; Heys DR; Lampe K
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2005 Dec; 136(12):1714-23. PubMed ID: 16383055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Margin gap size of ceramic inlays using second-generation CAD/CAM equipment.
    Sturdevant JR; Bayne SC; Heymann HO
    J Esthet Dent; 1999; 11(4):206-14. PubMed ID: 10825877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Up to 27-years clinical long-term results of chairside Cerec 1 CAD/CAM inlays and onlays.
    Otto T
    Int J Comput Dent; 2017; 20(3):315-329. PubMed ID: 28852748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical long-term results and 10-year Kaplan-Meier analysis of Cerec restorations.
    Reiss B; Walther W
    Int J Comput Dent; 2000 Jan; 3(1):9-23. PubMed ID: 11351392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A 3-year study of inlays milled from machinable ceramic blocks representing 2 different inlay systems.
    Thordrup M; Isidor F; Hörsted-Bindslev P
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Dec; 30(12):829-36. PubMed ID: 10765860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays bonded with different luting agents.
    Gemalmaz D; Ozcan M; Alkumru HN
    J Adhes Dent; 2001; 3(3):273-83. PubMed ID: 11803715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays and onlays fabricated with two systems: five-year follow-up.
    Santos MJ; Mondelli RF; Navarro MF; Francischone CE; Rubo JH; Santos GC
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 22856680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A 5-year clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays (Cerec) cemented with a dual-cured or chemically cured resin composite luting agent.
    Sjögren G; Molin M; van Dijken JW
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1998 Oct; 56(5):263-7. PubMed ID: 9860093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The clinical performance of CAD-CAM-generated ceramic inlays: a four-year study.
    Heymann HO; Bayne SC; Sturdevant JR; Wilder AD; Roberson TM
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1996 Aug; 127(8):1171-81. PubMed ID: 8803392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays compared to composite restorations.
    Lange RT; Pfeiffer P
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(3):263-72. PubMed ID: 19544814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays and onlays fabricated with two systems: two-year clinical follow up.
    Coelho Santos MJ; Mondelli RF; Lauris JR; Navarro MF
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 15088722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Retrospective clinical evaluation of ceramic onlays placed by dental students.
    Archibald JJ; Santos GC; Moraes Coelho Santos MJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 May; 119(5):743-748.e1. PubMed ID: 28927922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.