342 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17694424)
21. Detecting deception via strategic disclosure of evidence.
Hartwig M; Granhag PA; Strömwall LA; Vrij A
Law Hum Behav; 2005 Aug; 29(4):469-84. PubMed ID: 16133950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Differentiation of deception using pupillary responses as an index of cognitive processing.
Dionisio DP; Granholm E; Hillix WA; Perrine WF
Psychophysiology; 2001 Mar; 38(2):205-11. PubMed ID: 11347866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Catching a Deceiver in the Act: Processes Underlying Deception in an Interactive Interview Setting.
Ströfer S; Ufkes EG; Noordzij ML; Giebels E
Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback; 2016 Sep; 41(3):349-62. PubMed ID: 27193132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Observers' performance at evaluating truthfulness when provided with comparable truth or small talk baselines.
Caso L; Palena N; Vrij A; Gnisci A
Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2019; 26(4):571-579. PubMed ID: 31984097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Deception detection expertise.
Bond GD
Law Hum Behav; 2008 Aug; 32(4):339-51. PubMed ID: 17690956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Nonverbal signs of deception during posthypnotic amnesia: a brief communication.
Kennedy J; Coe WC
Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1994 Jan; 42(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 8112924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Police accuracy in truth/lie detection when judging baseline interviews.
Caso L; Palena N; Carlessi E; Vrij A
Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2019; 26(6):841-850. PubMed ID: 32128012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Registered report: measuring unconscious deception detection by skin temperature.
van ' T Veer AE; Stel M; van Beest I; Gallucci M
Front Psychol; 2014; 5():442. PubMed ID: 24904461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. You want to know the truth? Then don't mimic!
Stel M; van Dijk E; Olivier E
Psychol Sci; 2009 Jun; 20(6):693-9. PubMed ID: 19422628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Appearing truthful generalizes across different deception situations.
Frank MG; Ekman P
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2004 Mar; 86(3):486-95. PubMed ID: 15008651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Unanticipated questions can yield unanticipated outcomes in investigative interviews.
Parkhouse T; Ormerod TC
PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0208751. PubMed ID: 30532180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Learning to Detect Deception from Evasive Answers and Inconsistencies across Repeated Interviews: A Study with Lay Respondents and Police Officers.
Masip J; Martínez C; Blandón-Gitlin I; Sánchez N; Herrero C; Ibabe I
Front Psychol; 2017; 8():2207. PubMed ID: 29354078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Lie-detection biases among male police interrogators, prisoners, and laypersons.
Elaad E
Psychol Rep; 2009 Dec; 105(3 Pt 2):1047-56. PubMed ID: 20229908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Examining police officers' response bias in judging veracity.
Masip J; Herrero C
Psicothema; 2017 Nov; 29(4):490-495. PubMed ID: 29048308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Strategic Interviewing to Detect Deception: Cues to Deception across Repeated Interviews.
Masip J; Blandón-Gitlin I; Martínez C; Herrero C; Ibabe I
Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1702. PubMed ID: 27847493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Lying words: predicting deception from linguistic styles.
Newman ML; Pennebaker JW; Berry DS; Richards JM
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2003 May; 29(5):665-75. PubMed ID: 15272998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Credibility judgements of detectives: the impact of nonverbal behavior, social skills, and physical characteristics on impression formation.
Vrij A
J Soc Psychol; 1993 Oct; 133(5):601-10. PubMed ID: 8283858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Detecting deception in children: event familiarity affects criterion-based content analysis ratings.
Pezdek K; Morrow A; Blandon-Gitlin I; Goodman GS; Quas JA; Saywitz KJ; Bidrose S; Pipe ME; Rogers M; Brodie L
J Appl Psychol; 2004 Feb; 89(1):119-26. PubMed ID: 14769124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Assessing the efficacy of baselining in deception detection: A comparative analysis of the reality interview and structured interview.
Bogaard G; van de Bovekamp AM; Colwell K
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2024 Feb; 242():104112. PubMed ID: 38070326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Are computers effective lie detectors? A meta-analysis of linguistic cues to deception.
Hauch V; Blandón-Gitlin I; Masip J; Sporer SL
Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2015 Nov; 19(4):307-42. PubMed ID: 25387767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
