106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17694536)
1. Dosimetric evaluation and comparison of different RF exposure apparatuses used in human volunteer studies.
Boutry CM; Kuehn S; Achermann P; Romann A; Keshvari J; Kuster N
Bioelectromagnetics; 2008 Jan; 29(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 17694536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Guidance for exposure design of human studies addressing health risk evaluations of mobile phones.
Kuster N; Schuderer J; Christ A; Futter P; Ebert S
Bioelectromagnetics; 2004 Oct; 25(7):524-9. PubMed ID: 15376239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Exposure setups for laboratory animals and volunteer studies using body-mounted antennas.
Bahr A; Adami C; Bolz T; Rennings A; Dorn H; Rüttiger L
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 124(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 17595209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. No influence on selected parameters of human visual perception of 1970 MHz UMTS-like exposure.
Schmid G; Sauter C; Stepansky R; Lobentanz IS; Zeitlhofer J
Bioelectromagnetics; 2005 May; 26(4):243-50. PubMed ID: 15832335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. No effect of an UMTS mobile phone-like electromagnetic field of 1.97 GHz on human attention and reaction time.
Unterlechner M; Sauter C; Schmid G; Zeitlhofer J
Bioelectromagnetics; 2008 Feb; 29(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 17957702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Factors that influence the radiofrequency power output of GSM mobile phones.
Erdreich LS; Van Kerkhove MD; Scrafford CG; Barraj L; McNeely M; Shum M; Sheppard AR; Kelsh M
Radiat Res; 2007 Aug; 168(2):253-61. PubMed ID: 17638408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Setup and dosimetry for exposing anaesthetised pigs in vivo to 900 MHz GSM mobile phone fields.
Toivonen T; Toivo T; Pitkäaho R; Puranen L; Silfverhuth M; Mennander A; Hannula M; Hyttinen J; Jokela K
Bioelectromagnetics; 2008 Jul; 29(5):363-70. PubMed ID: 18247366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of cellular phone use on ear canal temperature measured by NTC thermistors.
Tahvanainen K; Niño J; Halonen P; Kuusela T; Alanko T; Laitinen T; Länsimies E; Hietanen M; Lindholm H
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2007 May; 27(3):162-72. PubMed ID: 17445067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Determinants of mobile phone output power in a multinational study: implications for exposure assessment.
Vrijheid M; Mann S; Vecchia P; Wiart J; Taki M; Ardoino L; Armstrong BK; Auvinen A; Bédard D; Berg-Beckhoff G; Brown J; Chetrit A; Collatz-Christensen H; Combalot E; Cook A; Deltour I; Feychting M; Giles GG; Hepworth SJ; Hours M; Iavarone I; Johansen C; Krewski D; Kurttio P; Lagorio S; Lönn S; McBride M; Montestrucq L; Parslow RC; Sadetzki S; Schüz J; Tynes T; Woodward A; Cardis E
Occup Environ Med; 2009 Oct; 66(10):664-71. PubMed ID: 19465409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of measuring instruments for radiofrequency radiation from mobile telephones in epidemiological studies: implications for exposure assessment.
Inyang I; Benke G; McKenzie R; Abramson M
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2008 Mar; 18(2):134-41. PubMed ID: 17327852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dosimetric assessment of an exposure system for simulating GSM and WCDMA mobile phone usage.
Bahr A; Dorn H; Bolz T
Bioelectromagnetics; 2006 May; 27(4):320-7. PubMed ID: 16557502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Methodology of detailed dosimetry and treatment of uncertainty and variations for in vivo studies.
Kuster N; Torres VB; Nikoloski N; Frauscher M; Kainz W
Bioelectromagnetics; 2006 Jul; 27(5):378-91. PubMed ID: 16615059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Applicability of an exposure model for the determination of emissions from mobile phone base stations.
Breckenkamp J; Neitzke HP; Bornkessel C; Berg-Beckhoff G
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(4):474-81. PubMed ID: 18676976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radio frequency exposure in mobile phone users: implications for exposure assessment in epidemiological studies.
Morrissey JJ
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 123(4):490-7. PubMed ID: 17213224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. EEG electrode caps can reduce SAR induced in the head by GSM900 mobile phones.
Hamblin DL; Anderson V; McIntosh RL; McKenzie RJ; Wood AW; Iskra S; Croft RJ
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 May; 54(5):914-20. PubMed ID: 17518289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The dielectric properties of human pineal gland tissue and RF absorption due to wireless communication devices in the frequency range 400-1850 MHz.
Schmid G; Uberbacher R; Samaras T; Tschabitscher M; Mazal PR
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Sep; 52(17):5457-68. PubMed ID: 17762098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of SAR and thermal changes near a cochlear implant system for mobile phone type exposures.
McIntosh RL; Iskra S; McKenzie RJ; Chambers J; Metzenthen B; Anderson V
Bioelectromagnetics; 2008 Jan; 29(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 17902159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of the radio-frequency electromagnetic fields induced in the human body from mobile phones used with hands-free kits.
Kühn S; Cabot E; Christ A; Capstick M; Kuster N
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Sep; 54(18):5493-508. PubMed ID: 19706964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Setup and dosimetry for exposure of human skin in vivo to RF-EMF at 900 MHz.
Toivonen T; Toivo T; Puranen L; Jokela K
Bioelectromagnetics; 2008 Apr; 29(3):207-12. PubMed ID: 18044739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
