441 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17694865)
1. Geometry-adapted hexahedral meshes improve accuracy of finite-element-method-based EEG source analysis.
Wolters CH; Anwander A; Berti G; Hartmann U
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Aug; 54(8):1446-53. PubMed ID: 17694865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A full subtraction approach for finite element method based source analysis using constrained Delaunay tetrahedralisation.
Drechsler F; Wolters CH; Dierkes T; Si H; Grasedyck L
Neuroimage; 2009 Jul; 46(4):1055-65. PubMed ID: 19264145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Representation of bioelectric current sources using Whitney elements in the finite element method.
Tanzer IO; Järvenpää S; Nenonen J; Somersalo E
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jul; 50(13):3023-39. PubMed ID: 15972978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dipole estimation errors due to differences in modeling anisotropic conductivities in realistic head models for EEG source analysis.
Hallez H; Vanrumste B; Van Hese P; Delputte S; Lemahieu I
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Apr; 53(7):1877-94. PubMed ID: 18364544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ellipsoidal refinement of the regularized inverse: performance in an anatomically realistic EEG model.
Schimpf PH; Haueisen J; Ramon C
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Apr; 51(4):679-83. PubMed ID: 15072223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Parametric surface-source modeling and estimation with electroencephalography.
Cao N; Yetik IS; Nehorai A; Muravchik CH; Haueisen J
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Dec; 53(12 Pt 1):2414-24. PubMed ID: 17153198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Estimating brain conductivities and dipole source signals with EEG arrays.
Gutiérrez D; Nehorai A; Muravchik CH
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Dec; 51(12):2113-22. PubMed ID: 15605858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of the isolated problem approach for multi-compartment BEM models of electro-magnetic source imaging.
Gençer NG; Akalin-Acar Z
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jul; 50(13):3007-22. PubMed ID: 15972977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of head models on EEG simulations and inverse source localizations.
Ramon C; Schimpf PH; Haueisen J
Biomed Eng Online; 2006 Feb; 5():10. PubMed ID: 16466570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A meshless method for solving the EEG forward problem.
von Ellenrieder N; Muravchik CH; Nehorai A
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Feb; 52(2):249-57. PubMed ID: 15709662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of tissue conductivity anisotropy on EEG/MEG field and return current computation in a realistic head model: a simulation and visualization study using high-resolution finite element modeling.
Wolters CH; Anwander A; Tricoche X; Weinstein D; Koch MA; MacLeod RS
Neuroimage; 2006 Apr; 30(3):813-26. PubMed ID: 16364662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influences of skull segmentation inaccuracies on EEG source analysis.
Lanfer B; Scherg M; Dannhauer M; Knösche TR; Burger M; Wolters CH
Neuroimage; 2012 Aug; 62(1):418-31. PubMed ID: 22584227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Estimating parametric line-source models with electroencephalography.
Cao N; Yetik IS; Nehorai A; Muravchik CH; Haueisen J
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Nov; 53(11):2156-65. PubMed ID: 17073320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of anisotropic conductivity on EEG source reconstruction: investigations in a rabbit model.
Güllmar D; Haueisen J; Eiselt M; Giessler F; Flemming L; Anwander A; Knösche TR; Wolters CH; Dümpelmann M; Tuch DS; Reichenbach JR
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Sep; 53(9):1841-50. PubMed ID: 16941840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Conventional and reciprocal approaches to the inverse dipole localization problem of electroencephalography.
Finke S; Gulrajani RM; Gotman J
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Jun; 50(6):657-66. PubMed ID: 12814232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Forward and inverse problems of EEG dipole localization.
Musha T; Okamoto Y
Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 1999; 27(3-5):189-239. PubMed ID: 10864280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dipole estimation errors due to not incorporating anisotropic conductivities in realistic head models for EEG source analysis.
Hallez H; Staelens S; Lemahieu I
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Oct; 54(20):6079-93. PubMed ID: 19779215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Array response kernels for EEG and MEG in multilayer ellipsoidal geometry.
Gutiérrez D; Nehorai A
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Mar; 55(3):1103-11. PubMed ID: 18334402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison between realistic and spherical approaches in EEG forward modelling.
Meneghini F; Vatta F; Esposito F; Mininel S; Di Salle F
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2010 Jun; 55(3):133-46. PubMed ID: 20178450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Standardized shrinking LORETA-FOCUSS (SSLOFO): a new algorithm for spatio-temporal EEG source reconstruction.
Liu H; Schimpf PH; Dong G; Gao X; Yang F; Gao S
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Oct; 52(10):1681-91. PubMed ID: 16235654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
