These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17695351)

  • 1. PC_Eyewitness: evaluating the New Jersey method.
    MacLin OH; Phelan CM
    Behav Res Methods; 2007 May; 39(2):242-7. PubMed ID: 17695351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. PC_Eyewitness and the sequential superiority effect: computer-based lineup administration.
    MacLin OH; Zimmerman LA; Malpass RS
    Law Hum Behav; 2005 Jun; 29(3):303-21. PubMed ID: 15965630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Double-blind photo lineups using actual eyewitnesses: an experimental test of a sequential versus simultaneous lineup procedure.
    Wells GL; Steblay NK; Dysart JE
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Feb; 39(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 24933175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The impact of eyewitness identifications from simultaneous and sequential lineups.
    Wright DB
    Memory; 2007 Oct; 15(7):746-54. PubMed ID: 17852725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Configural and component processing in simultaneous and sequential lineup procedures.
    Flowe HD; Smith HM; Karoğlu N; Onwuegbusi TO; Rai L
    Memory; 2016; 24(3):306-14. PubMed ID: 25665039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Eyewitness accuracy rates in police showup and lineup presentations: a meta-analytic comparison.
    Steblay N; Dysart J; Fulero S; Lindsay RC
    Law Hum Behav; 2003 Oct; 27(5):523-40. PubMed ID: 14593796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Eyewitness identification in simultaneous and sequential lineups: an investigation of position effects using receiver operating characteristics.
    Meisters J; Diedenhofen B; Musch J
    Memory; 2018 Oct; 26(9):1297-1309. PubMed ID: 29676666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimating the reliability of eyewitness identifications from police lineups.
    Wixted JT; Mickes L; Dunn JC; Clark SE; Wells W
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Jan; 113(2):304-9. PubMed ID: 26699467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Eyewitness accuracy rates in sequential and simultaneous lineup presentations: a meta-analytic comparison.
    Steblay N; Dysart J; Fulero S; Lindsay RC
    Law Hum Behav; 2001 Oct; 25(5):459-73. PubMed ID: 11688368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. PC_Eyewitness: a computerized framework for the administration and practical application of research in eyewitness psychology.
    MacLin OH; Meissner CA; Zimmerman LA
    Behav Res Methods; 2005 May; 37(2):324-34. PubMed ID: 16171204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measuring lineup fairness from eyewitness identification data using a multinomial processing tree model.
    Menne NM; Winter K; Bell R; Buchner A
    Sci Rep; 2023 Apr; 13(1):6290. PubMed ID: 37072473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sequential lineup presentation promotes less-biased criterion setting but does not improve discriminability.
    Palmer MA; Brewer N
    Law Hum Behav; 2012 Jun; 36(3):247-55. PubMed ID: 22667814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Relationship Between Eyewitness Confidence and Identification Accuracy: A New Synthesis.
    Wixted JT; Wells GL
    Psychol Sci Public Interest; 2017 May; 18(1):10-65. PubMed ID: 28395650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Active exploration of faces in police lineups increases discrimination accuracy.
    Colloff MF; Flowe HD; Smith HMJ; Seale-Carlisle TM; Meissner CA; Rockey JC; Pande B; Kujur P; Parveen N; Chandel P; Singh MM; Pradhan S; Parganiha A
    Am Psychol; 2022; 77(2):196-220. PubMed ID: 34793182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What we know now: the Evanston Illinois field lineups.
    Steblay NK
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Feb; 35(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 20177754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Eyewitness identification in actual criminal cases: an archival analysis.
    Behrman BW; Davey SL
    Law Hum Behav; 2001 Oct; 25(5):475-91. PubMed ID: 11688369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. New signal detection theory-based framework for eyewitness performance in lineups.
    Lee J; Penrod SD
    Law Hum Behav; 2019 Oct; 43(5):436-454. PubMed ID: 31368723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Eyewitness confidence in simultaneous and sequential lineups: a criterion shift account for sequential mistaken identification overconfidence.
    Dobolyi DG; Dodson CS
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2013 Dec; 19(4):345-57. PubMed ID: 24188335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing witness performance in the field versus the lab: How real-world conditions affect eyewitness decision-making.
    Eisen ML; Ying RC; Chui C; Swaby MA
    Law Hum Behav; 2022 Jun; 46(3):175-188. PubMed ID: 35604705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sequential lineup laps and eyewitness accuracy.
    Steblay NK; Dietrich HL; Ryan SL; Raczynski JL; James KA
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Aug; 35(4):262-74. PubMed ID: 20632113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.