BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17695629)

  • 1. Who reviews the projects of unaffiliated researchers for ethics? A case study from Alberta.
    O'Beirne M; Stingl M; Hayward S
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2007; 16(3):346-55. PubMed ID: 17695629
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Financial conflicts of interest and protection of human research subjects.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2004 Jun; 19(6):1-2. PubMed ID: 15462034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ethical conduct recommendations for quality improvement projects.
    Layer T
    J Healthc Qual; 2003; 25(4):44-6. PubMed ID: 14606212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Research governance and ethics: a resource for novice researchers.
    Fontenla M; Rycroft-Malone J
    Nurs Stand; 2006 Feb 15-21; 20(23):41-6. PubMed ID: 16514927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development and oversight of ethical health promotion quality assurance and evaluation activities involving human participants.
    Sainsbury P
    Health Promot J Austr; 2015 Dec; 26(3):176-181. PubMed ID: 26536392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ethical attitudes of nurse, physician, and unaffiliated members of institutional review boards.
    Rothstein WG; Phuong LH
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2007; 39(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 17393970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The institutional review board and investigator conflicts of interest.
    Weber LJ; Bissell MG
    Clin Leadersh Manag Rev; 2003; 17(1):39-40. PubMed ID: 12592877
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Values based decision making in healthcare: introduction.
    McCartney JJ
    HEC Forum; 2005 Mar; 17(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 15957264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Extend the reach of institutional review boards first, then strengthen their depth.
    Spike J
    Am J Bioeth; 2008 Nov; 8(11):11-2. PubMed ID: 19061097
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Peer review: Revise rules on conflicts of interest.
    Žliobaitė I; Fortelius M
    Nature; 2016 Nov; 539(7628):168. PubMed ID: 27830803
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Conflict of interest and evaluation research: should we do effectiveness studies of our own educational programs?
    Olson CA
    J Contin Educ Health Prof; 2013; 33(4):203-5. PubMed ID: 24347098
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Justice in jeopardy: a qualitative study of institutional ethics committees in New Delhi.
    Kandhari R
    Indian J Med Ethics; 2013; 10(3):176-83. PubMed ID: 23912731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ethical dilemmas of a large national multi-centre study in Australia: time for some consistency.
    Driscoll A; Currey J; Worrall-Carter L; Stewart S
    J Clin Nurs; 2008 Aug; 17(16):2212-20. PubMed ID: 18705740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Module five: implementation of ethics review.
    Dhai A
    Dev World Bioeth; 2005 Mar; 5(1):73-91. PubMed ID: 15748179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Medical research oversight from the corporate governance perspective: comparing institutional review boards and corporate boards.
    Saver RS
    William Mary Law Rev; 2004 Nov; 46(2):619-730. PubMed ID: 17167924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Research ethics and law of healthcare system quality improvement: the conflict of cost containment and quality.
    Kofke WA; Rie MA
    Crit Care Med; 2003 Mar; 31(3 Suppl):S143-52. PubMed ID: 12626960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality improvement and the need for IRB review.
    Nerenz DR; Stoltz PK; Jordan J
    Qual Manag Health Care; 2003; 12(3):159-70. PubMed ID: 12891960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Research and quality improvement activities: when is institutional review board review needed?
    McNett M; Lawry K
    J Neurosci Nurs; 2009 Dec; 41(6):344-7. PubMed ID: 19998686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Revising ethical guidance for the evaluation of programmes and interventions not initiated by researchers.
    Watson SI; Dixon-Woods M; Taylor CA; Wroe EB; Dunbar EL; Chilton PJ; Lilford RJ
    J Med Ethics; 2020 Jan; 46(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 31481472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation in health promotion: thoughts from inside a human research ethics committee.
    Allen J; Flack F
    Health Promot J Austr; 2015 Dec; 26(3):182-185. PubMed ID: 26538345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.