173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17695914)
1. Regional air quality: local and interstate impacts of NO(x) and SO2 emissions on ozone and fine particulate matter in the eastern United States.
Bergin MS; Shih JS; Krupnick AJ; Boylan JW; Wilkinson JG; Odman MT; Russell AG
Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Jul; 41(13):4677-89. PubMed ID: 17695914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Using air quality modeling to study source-receptor relationships between nitrogen oxides emissions and ozone exposures over the United States.
Tong DQ; Muller NZ; Kan H; Mendelsohn RO
Environ Int; 2009 Nov; 35(8):1109-17. PubMed ID: 19656569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contributions of regional air pollutant emissions to ozone and fine particulate matter-related mortalities in eastern U.S. urban areas.
Hou X; Strickland MJ; Liao KJ
Environ Res; 2015 Feb; 137():475-84. PubMed ID: 25701729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Demonstration of a mobile Flux Laboratory for the Atmospheric Measurement of Emissions (FLAME) to assess emissions inventories.
Moore TO; Doughty DC; Marr LC
J Environ Monit; 2009 Feb; 11(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 19212582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Summertime state-level source-receptor relationships between nitrogen oxides emissions and surface ozone concentrations over the continental United States.
Tong DQ; Mauzerall DL
Environ Sci Technol; 2008 Nov; 42(21):7976-84. PubMed ID: 19031890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impacts of transportation sector emissions on future U.S. air quality in a changing climate. Part II: Air quality projections and the interplay between emissions and climate change.
Campbell P; Zhang Y; Yan F; Lu Z; Streets D
Environ Pollut; 2018 Jul; 238():918-930. PubMed ID: 29684896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantifying the sources of ozone, fine particulate matter, and regional haze in the Southeastern United States.
Odman MT; Hu Y; Russell AG; Hanedar A; Boylan JW; Brewer PF
J Environ Manage; 2009 Jul; 90(10):3155-68. PubMed ID: 19556055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Response of inorganic fine particulate matter to emission changes of sulfur dioxide and ammonia: the eastern United States as a case study.
Tsimpidi AP; Karydis VA; Pandis SN
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2007 Dec; 57(12):1489-98. PubMed ID: 18200934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Expected ozone benefits of reducing nitrogen oxide (NO
Vinciguerra T; Bull E; Canty T; He H; Zalewsky E; Woodman M; Aburn G; Ehrman S; Dickerson RR
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2017 Mar; 67(3):279-291. PubMed ID: 27650304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accountability analysis of title IV phase 2 of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments.
Morgenstern RD; Harrington W; Shih JS; Bell ML;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 Nov; (168):5-35. PubMed ID: 23409509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contributions of natural emissions to ozone and PM2.5 as simulated by the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model.
Mueller SF; Mallard JW
Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Jun; 45(11):4817-23. PubMed ID: 21545154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dynamic Management of NOx and SO2 Emissions in the Texas and Mid-Atlantic Electric Power Systems and Implications for Air Quality.
McDonald-Buller E; Kimura Y; Craig M; McGaughey G; Allen D; Webster M
Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Feb; 50(3):1611-9. PubMed ID: 26727552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effectiveness of Emission Controls to Reduce the Atmospheric Concentrations of Mercury.
Castro MS; Sherwell J
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Dec; 49(24):14000-7. PubMed ID: 26606506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Modeling and direct sensitivity analysis of biogenic emissions impacts on regional ozone formation in the Mexico-U.S. border area.
Mendoza-Dominguez A; Wilkinson JG; Yang YJ; Russell AG
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2000 Jan; 50(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 10680362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The London low emission zone baseline study.
Kelly F; Armstrong B; Atkinson R; Anderson HR; Barratt B; Beevers S; Cook D; Green D; Derwent D; Mudway I; Wilkinson P;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2011 Nov; (163):3-79. PubMed ID: 22315924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Air quality accountability: Developing long-term daily time series of pollutant changes and uncertainties in Atlanta, Georgia resulting from the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments.
Henneman LRF; Liu C; Chang H; Mulholland J; Tolbert P; Russell A
Environ Int; 2019 Feb; 123():522-534. PubMed ID: 30622077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Source apportionment of emissions from light-duty gasoline vehicles and other sources in the United States for ozone and particulate matter.
Vijayaraghavan K; Lindhjem C; Koo B; DenBleyker A; Tai E; Shah T; Alvarez Y; Yarwood G
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2016 Feb; 66(2):98-119. PubMed ID: 26563640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Single-source impact analysis using three-dimensional air quality models.
Bergin MS; Russell AG; Odman MT; Cohan DS; Chameides WL
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2008 Oct; 58(10):1351-9. PubMed ID: 18939782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Regional impacts of oil and gas development on ozone formation in the western United States.
Rodriguez MA; Barna MG; Moore T
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2009 Sep; 59(9):1111-8. PubMed ID: 19785277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Nonlinear response of ozone to emissions: source apportionment and sensitivity analysis.
Cohan DS; Hakami A; Hu Y; Russell AG
Environ Sci Technol; 2005 Sep; 39(17):6739-48. PubMed ID: 16190234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
