129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17696026)
1. Starson v. Swayze: the Supreme Court speaks out (not all that clearly) on the question of "capacity".
Sklar R
Can J Psychiatry; 2007 Jun; 52(6):390-6. PubMed ID: 17696026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Supreme court of Canada's "Beautiful Mind" case.
Gray JE; O'Reilly RL
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2009; 32(5):315-22. PubMed ID: 19643478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fleming v. Reid.
Canada. Ontario. Court of Appeal
Dom Law Rep; 1991 Jun; 82():298-320. PubMed ID: 12041088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The use of deprivation of liberty safeguards in hospitals to increase.
Griffith R
Br J Nurs; 2014 Apr 24-May 7; 23(8):434-5. PubMed ID: 24763299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The right to refuse treatment: recent Canadian developments.
Gratzer TG; Matas M
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(2):249-56. PubMed ID: 7949413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Mental Capacity Act 2005: mental capacity and mental illness.
Dimond B
Br J Nurs; 2008 Feb 14-27; 17(3):182-4. PubMed ID: 18414259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. United States v. Charters.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Fed Report; 1987 Sep; 829():479-500. PubMed ID: 11648561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Court-authorised deprivation of liberty.
Griffith R
Br J Community Nurs; 2015 Jan; 20(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 25559028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Best interests and treatment for mental disorder.
Fennell P
Health Care Anal; 2008 Sep; 16(3):255-67. PubMed ID: 18677569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Supreme Court looks at psychiatry.
Appelbaum PS
Am J Psychiatry; 1984 Jul; 141(7):827-35. PubMed ID: 6731630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In re Jeffers.
Illinois. Appellate Court, Fourth District
North East Rep Second Ser; 1992 Dec; 606():727-32. PubMed ID: 12041212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Denouement of an execution competency case: is Perry pyrrhic?
Mossman D
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1995; 23(2):269-84. PubMed ID: 8605411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Jones v. Gerhardstein: the involuntarily committed mental patient's right to refuse treatment with psychotropic drugs.
Ledwith DM
Wis L Rev; 1990; 1990(5):1367-98. PubMed ID: 16047454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Starson v. Swayze, 2003-2008: appreciating the judicial consequences.
Dull MW
Health Law J; 2009; 17():51-79. PubMed ID: 20608315
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Rennie v. Klein.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Fed Report; 1983 Oct; 720():266-77. PubMed ID: 11648483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In re Mental Commitment of M.P.
Indiana. Court of Appeals, Second District
North East Rep Second Ser; 1986 Nov; 500():216-28. PubMed ID: 12041210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rogers v. Commissioner of Department of Mental Health.
Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court, Suffolk
Mass Rep Mass Supreme Judic Court; 1983 Nov; 390():489-513. PubMed ID: 12041109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. After Cruzan. The U. S. Supreme Court's decision settles the case but raises new questions.
Johnson SH
Health Prog; 1990 Oct; 71(8):38-41, 57. PubMed ID: 10107437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Psychiatry caught between emergency response and therapy: compulsory treatment following the jurisprudence of the federal constitutional court and the federal supreme court].
Müller JL; Falkai P; Schneider F; Hauth I; Maier W
Psychiatr Prax; 2013 Oct; 40(7):365-7. PubMed ID: 24101137
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Bound to freedom: the Ulysses contract and the psychiatric will.
Macklin A
Univ Tor Fac Law Rev; 1987; 45(1):37-68. PubMed ID: 11659143
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
