63 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17696077)
1. Short history of mammography: a Belgian perspective.
Van Steen A; Van Tiggelen R
JBR-BTR; 2007; 90(3):151-3. PubMed ID: 17696077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [History of mammography].
Picard JD
Bull Acad Natl Med; 1998; 182(8):1613-20. PubMed ID: 10188307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Some glipses from the history of mammography: from radiography of preparations to general screening].
Andersson I
Lakartidningen; 1996 Apr; 93(14):1329-33. PubMed ID: 8656864
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The evolution of mammography.
Gold RH
Radiol Clin North Am; 1992 Jan; 30(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 1732920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Mammography Quality Standards Act of 1992: history and process.
Houn F; Franke KA; Elliott ML; Finder CA; Burkhart RL; Fischer R
Food Drug Law J; 1995; 50(4):485-92. PubMed ID: 10343015
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Highlights from the history of mammography.
Gold RH; Bassett LW; Widoff BE
Radiographics; 1990 Nov; 10(6):1111-31. PubMed ID: 2259767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Historical technical developments in mammography.
Haus AG
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2002 Apr; 1(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 12622518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Centennial photo page. From the AJR archives: celebrating the ARRS centennial. Fifty-three cases of carcinoma of the breast: occult until mammography.
Donnelly LF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 May; 174(5):1256. PubMed ID: 10789772
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Soft-copy reading in digital mammography of mass: diagnostic performance of a 5-megapixel cathode ray tube monitor versus a 3-megapixel liquid crystal display monitor in a diagnostic setting.
Uematsu T; Kasami M
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):623-9. PubMed ID: 18568553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Artifacts in digital mammography.
Van Ongeval C; Jacobs J; Bosmans H
JBR-BTR; 2008; 91(6):262-3. PubMed ID: 19203002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. History and status of x-ray mammography.
Hendee WR
Health Phys; 1995 Nov; 69(5):636-48. PubMed ID: 7558858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The evolution of mammography.
Bassett LW; Gold RH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Mar; 150(3):493-8. PubMed ID: 3277343
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Mammography: better, safer, and more effective?
Linton OW; Schauer DA
Radiology; 2006 Jul; 240(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 16793970
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. History and recent developments in xeroradiography of the breast.
Wolfe JN
Radiol Clin North Am; 1987 Sep; 25(5):929-37. PubMed ID: 3306774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does a national screening programme reduce socioeconomic inequalities in mammography use?
Puddu M; Demarest S; Tafforeau J
Int J Public Health; 2009; 54(2):61-8. PubMed ID: 19247577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. History of health technology assessment in Belgium.
Cleemput I; Van Wilder P
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Jul; 25 Suppl 1():82-7. PubMed ID: 19500438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. "To see today with the eyes of tomorrow": A history of screening mammography.
Lerner BH
Can Bull Med Hist; 2003; 20(2):299-321. PubMed ID: 14723235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [75th anniversary of the first mammography].
Semiglazov VF; Vesnin AG
Vopr Onkol; 1989; 35(2):233-7. PubMed ID: 2648679
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [History of mammography in Hungary].
Tóth E
Orv Hetil; 1999 May; 140(21):1204. PubMed ID: 10380548
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of periodic breast cancer screening with mammography: methodology and early observations. 1966.
Shapiro S; Strax P; Venet L
CA Cancer J Clin; 1990; 40(2):111-25. PubMed ID: 2106369
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
