183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17696158)
1. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging for grading pelvic organ prolapse according to the International Continence Society classification: which line should be used?
Fauconnier A; Zareski E; Abichedid J; Bader G; Falissard B; Fritel X
Neurourol Urodyn; 2008; 27(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 17696158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment and grading of pelvic organ prolapse by use of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging.
Singh K; Reid WM; Berger LA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Jul; 185(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 11483907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Imaging pelvic floor prolapse].
Deval B; Vulierme MP; Poilpot S; Menu Y; Levardon M
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2003 Feb; 32(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 12592178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical examination and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in vaginal vault prolapse.
Cortes E; Reid WM; Singh K; Berger L
Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jan; 103(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 14704242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of pelvic organ descent by use of functional cine-MRI: which reference line should be used?
Lienemann A; Sprenger D; Janssen U; Grosch E; Pellengahr C; Anthuber C
Neurourol Urodyn; 2004; 23(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 14694454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating functional disorders of female pelvic floor.
Torricelli P; Pecchi A; Caruso Lombardi A; Vetruccio E; Vetruccio S; Romagnoli R
Radiol Med; 2002; 103(5-6):488-500. PubMed ID: 12207184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging: reliability of anatomical landmarks and reference lines used to assess pelvic organ prolapse.
Broekhuis SR; Kluivers KB; Hendriks JC; Vierhout ME; Barentsz JO; Fütterer JJ
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2009 Feb; 20(2):141-8. PubMed ID: 19002366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reproducibility of the aortic input function (AIF) derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of the kidneys in a volunteer study.
Mendichovszky IA; Cutajar M; Gordon I
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):576-81. PubMed ID: 19004588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Static and dynamic MRI features of the levator ani and correlation with severity of genital prolapse.
Ansquer Y; Fernandez P; Chapron C; Frey C; Bennis M; Roy C; Salomon L; Mandelbrot L; Carbonne B
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(12):1468-75. PubMed ID: 17260224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. OMERACT Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies. Exercise 5: an international multicenter reliability study using computerized MRI erosion volume measurements.
Bird P; Ejbjerg B; McQueen F; Ostergaard M; Lassere M; Edmonds J
J Rheumatol; 2003 Jun; 30(6):1380-4. PubMed ID: 12784421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reproducibility of 3D free-breathing magnetic resonance coronary vessel wall imaging.
Desai MY; Lai S; Barmet C; Weiss RG; Stuber M
Eur Heart J; 2005 Nov; 26(21):2320-4. PubMed ID: 15972291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Short-range clinical, dynamic magnetic resonance imaging and P-QOL questionnaire results after mesh repair in female pelvic organ prolapse.
Brocker KA; Alt CD; Corteville C; Hallscheidt P; Lenz F; Sohn C
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Jul; 157(1):107-12. PubMed ID: 21459506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Study of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of pelvic organ prolapse.
Gupta S; Sharma JB; Hari S; Kumar S; Roy KK; Singh N
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Oct; 286(4):953-8. PubMed ID: 22678559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Face validity and reliability of the first digital assessment scheme of pelvic floor muscle function conform the new standardized terminology of the International Continence Society.
Slieker-ten Hove MC; Pool-Goudzwaard AL; Eijkemans MJ; Steegers-Theunissen RP; Burger CW; Vierhout ME
Neurourol Urodyn; 2009; 28(4):295-300. PubMed ID: 19090583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Triphasic MRI of pelvic organ descent: sources of measurement error.
Morren GL; Balasingam AG; Wells JE; Hunter AM; Coates RH; Perry RE
Eur J Radiol; 2005 May; 54(2):276-83. PubMed ID: 15837410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging of healthy volunteers: pilot study results from the population-based SHIP study.
Hegenscheid K; Kühn JP; Völzke H; Biffar R; Hosten N; Puls R
Rofo; 2009 Aug; 181(8):748-59. PubMed ID: 19598074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse detected at dynamic MRI in women without history of pelvic floor dysfunction: comparison of two reference lines.
Rosenkrantz AB; Lewis MT; Yalamanchili S; Lim RP; Wong S; Bennett GL
Clin Radiol; 2014 Feb; 69(2):e71-7. PubMed ID: 24290773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of a speculum blade on dynamic MRI evaluation of pelvic organ prolapse.
Delaney S; Fernandez P; N'Guyen A; Salomon L; Carbonne B; Laissy JP; Ansquer Y
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(7):831-4. PubMed ID: 19330569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of lumbar spine foraminal stenosis--a surgeon's perspective.
Attias N; Hayman A; Hipp JA; Noble P; Esses SI
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2006 Jun; 19(4):249-56. PubMed ID: 16778658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reliability of a magnetic resonance imaging-based grading system for cervical intervertebral disc degeneration.
Miyazaki M; Hong SW; Yoon SH; Morishita Y; Wang JC
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Jun; 21(4):288-92. PubMed ID: 18525490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]