These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17696234)
21. Comparison of staging between the old (6th edition) and new (7th edition) TNM classifications in advanced gastric cancer. Kikuchi S; Futawatari N; Sakuramoto S; Katada N; Yamashita K; Shibata T; Nemoto M; Watanabe M Anticancer Res; 2011 Jun; 31(6):2361-5. PubMed ID: 21737665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Metastatic lymph node ratio in advanced gastric carcinoma: a better prognostic factor than number of metastatic lymph nodes? Lee SY; Hwang I; Park YS; Gardner J; Ro JY Int J Oncol; 2010 Jun; 36(6):1461-7. PubMed ID: 20428770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Clinical implications of the histologically and immunohistochemically detected solitary lymph node metastases in gastric cancer. Griniatsos J; Yiannakopoulou E; Gakiopoulou H; Alexandrou A; Dimitriou N; Karavokyros I; Felekouras E Scand J Surg; 2011; 100(3):174-80. PubMed ID: 22108745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The RML of lymph node metastasis was superior to the LODDS for evaluating the prognosis of gastric cancer. Liu H; Deng J; Zhang R; Hao X; Jiao X; Liang H Int J Surg; 2013; 11(5):419-24. PubMed ID: 23541652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A simple classification of lymph node level in gastric carcinoma. Adachi Y; Oshiro T; Okuyama T; Kamakura T; Mori M; Maehara Y; Sugimachi K Am J Surg; 1995 Apr; 169(4):382-5. PubMed ID: 7694976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Lymph node ratio is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer after curative resection (R0) regardless of the examined number of lymph nodes. Alatengbaolide ; Lin D; Li Y; Xu H; Chen J; Wang B; Liu C; Lu P Am J Clin Oncol; 2013 Aug; 36(4):325-30. PubMed ID: 22547011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The number of metastatic lymph nodes: a promising prognostic determinant for gastric carcinoma in the latest edition of the TNM classification. Kodera Y; Yamamura Y; Shimizu Y; Torii A; Hirai T; Yasui K; Morimoto T; Kato T; Kito T J Am Coll Surg; 1998 Dec; 187(6):597-603. PubMed ID: 9849732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Recurrence in early gastric cancer--presence of micrometastasis in lymph node of node negative early gastric cancer patient with recurrence. Saito H; Osaki T; Murakami D; Sakamoto T; Kanaji S; Ohro S; Tatebe S; Tsujitani S; Ikeguchi M Hepatogastroenterology; 2007 Mar; 54(74):620-4. PubMed ID: 17523336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Lymph node revealing solution in gastric carcinoma does not provide upstaging of the N-status. Luebke T; Baldus SE; Zirbes TK; Pham TD; Schneider PM; Dienes HP; Hölscher AH; Mönig SP Oncol Rep; 2005 Feb; 13(2):361-5. PubMed ID: 15643525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Prognostic significance of metastatic lymph node ratio: the lymph node ratio could be a prognostic indicator for patients with gastric cancer. Hou Y; Wang X; Chen J World J Surg Oncol; 2018 Oct; 16(1):198. PubMed ID: 30286762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Aberrant Cytokeratin 20 mRNA Expression in Peripheral Blood and Lymph Nodes Indicates Micrometastasis and Poor Prognosis in Patients With Gastric Carcinoma. You X; Wang Y; Wu J; Liu Q; Chen D; Tang D; Wang D Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2019 Jan; 18():1533033819832856. PubMed ID: 30827194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of the New American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union against cancer classification of lymph node metastasis from gastric carcinoma in comparison with the Japanese classification. Ichikura T; Tomimatsu S; Uefuji K; Kimura M; Uchida T; Morita D; Mochizuki H Cancer; 1999 Aug; 86(4):553-8. PubMed ID: 10440681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The prognostic value of different node staging systems in patients with ≤15 lymph nodes following surgery for gastric adenocarcinoma. Kılıç MÖ; Gündoğdu SB; Özden S; Saylam B; Tez M Acta Chir Belg; 2018 Feb; 118(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 28669280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Prognostic heterogeneity of the seventh edition of UICC Stage III gallbladder carcinoma: Which patients benefit from surgical resection? Sakata J; Kobayashi T; Ohashi T; Hirose Y; Takano K; Takizawa K; Miura K; Ishikawa H; Toge K; Yuza K; Soma D; Ando T; Wakai T Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Apr; 43(4):780-787. PubMed ID: 28132788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Occurrence and prognostic implications of micrometastases in lymph nodes from patients with submucosal gastric carcinoma. Choi HJ; Kim YK; Kim YH; Kim SS; Hong SH Ann Surg Oncol; 2002; 9(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 11829425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Prognostic value of lymph node staging in gastric cancer. Ichikawa D; Kurioka H; Ueshima Y; Shirono K; Kan K; Shioaki Y; Lee CJ; Hamashima T; Deguchi E; Ikeda E; Mutoh F; Yamagishi H Hepatogastroenterology; 2003; 50(49):301-4. PubMed ID: 12630046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Staging for Remnant Gastric Cancer: The Metastatic Lymph Node Ratio vs. the UICC 7th Edition System. Nakagawa M; Choi YY; An JY; Hong JH; Kim JW; Kim HI; Cheong JH; Hyung WJ; Choi SH; Noh SH Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Dec; 23(13):4322-4331. PubMed ID: 27370654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Lymph node metastases in gastric cancer: correlation between new and old UICC TNM classification. Omejc M; Juvan R; Jelenc F; Repse S Int Surg; 2001; 86(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 11890334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Clinical implication of an insufficient number of examined lymph nodes after curative resection for gastric cancer. Son T; Hyung WJ; Lee JH; Kim YM; Kim HI; An JY; Cheong JH; Noh SH Cancer; 2012 Oct; 118(19):4687-93. PubMed ID: 22415925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Disciplinarian of lymph node metastasis and effect of paraaortic lymph nodes dissection on clinical outcomes in advanced gastric carcinoma]. Zhan WH; Han FH; He YL; Li YM; Zheng ZQ; Peng JS; Cai SR; Ma JP Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Jan; 9(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 16437364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]