These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1769676)

  • 1. Divided attention in experienced young and older drivers: lane tracking and visual analysis in a dynamic driving simulator.
    Brouwer WH; Waterink W; Van Wolffelaar PC; Rothengatter T
    Hum Factors; 1991 Oct; 33(5):573-82. PubMed ID: 1769676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Age differences in divided attention in a simulated driving task.
    Ponds RW; Brouwer WH; van Wolffelaar PC
    J Gerontol; 1988 Nov; 43(6):P151-6. PubMed ID: 3183311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of age and auditory and visual dual tasks on closed-road driving performance.
    Chaparro A; Wood JM; Carberry T
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Aug; 82(8):747-54. PubMed ID: 16127341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fluctuating attentional demand in a simulated driving assessment: the roles of age and driving complexity.
    Stinchcombe A; Gagnon S; Zhang JJ; Montembeault P; Bedard M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2011 Dec; 12(6):576-87. PubMed ID: 22133333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Proactive vs. reactive car driving: EEG evidence for different driving strategies of older drivers.
    Karthaus M; Wascher E; Getzmann S
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0191500. PubMed ID: 29352314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Novice drivers' performance after different alcohol dosages and placebo in the divided-attention steering simulator (DASS).
    Verster JC; Wester AE; Goorden M; van Wieringen JP; Olivier B; Volkerts ER
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2009 May; 204(1):127-33. PubMed ID: 19125236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validation of a driving simulator by measuring the visual attention skill of older adult drivers.
    Lee HC; Lee AH; Cameron D
    Am J Occup Ther; 2003; 57(3):324-8. PubMed ID: 12785671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Attentional Demand of Automobile Driving Revisited: Occlusion Distance as a Function of Task-Relevant Event Density in Realistic Driving Scenarios.
    Kujala T; Mäkelä J; Kotilainen I; Tokkonen T
    Hum Factors; 2016 Feb; 58(1):163-80. PubMed ID: 26238120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual attention and older drivers: the contribution of inhibition of return to safe driving.
    Bédard M; Leonard E; McAuliffe J; Weaver B; Gibbons C; Dubois S
    Exp Aging Res; 2006; 32(2):119-35. PubMed ID: 16531357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Preparatory processes and compensatory effort in older and younger participants in a driving-like dual task.
    Wild-Wall N; Hahn M; Falkenstein M
    Hum Factors; 2011 Apr; 53(2):91-102. PubMed ID: 21702328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Responses in a manual tracking and visual detection task.
    Liu CC; Doong JL; Lin CY; Lai CH; Jeng MC; Hwang JR
    Percept Mot Skills; 2009 Dec; 109(3):899-910. PubMed ID: 20178289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Divided attention 5 to 10 years after severe closed head injury.
    Brouwer WH; Ponds RW; Van Wolffelaar PC; Van Zomeren AH
    Cortex; 1989 Jun; 25(2):219-30. PubMed ID: 2758848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Blur, eye movements and performance on a driving visual recognition slide test.
    Lee SS; Wood JM; Black AA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2015 Sep; 35(5):522-9. PubMed ID: 26189873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sensitivity of the lane change test as a measure of in-vehicle system demand.
    Young KL; Lenné MG; Williamson AR
    Appl Ergon; 2011 May; 42(4):611-8. PubMed ID: 20828672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interaction between visual status, driver age and distracters on daytime driving performance.
    Wood J; Chaparro A; Hickson L
    Vision Res; 2009 Aug; 49(17):2225-31. PubMed ID: 19559721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Right-lateralised lane keeping in young and older British drivers.
    Learmonth G; Märker G; McBride N; Pellinen P; Harvey M
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0203549. PubMed ID: 30188952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Were they in the loop during automated driving? Links between visual attention and crash potential.
    Louw T; Madigan R; Carsten O; Merat N
    Inj Prev; 2017 Aug; 23(4):281-286. PubMed ID: 27655754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Age differences in simulated driving performance: compensatory processes.
    Andrews EC; Westerman SJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2012 Mar; 45():660-8. PubMed ID: 22269555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Aging and time-sharing in highway driving.
    Wikman AS; Summala H
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Aug; 82(8):716-23. PubMed ID: 16127337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Gap acceptance and risk-taking by young and mature drivers, both sober and alcohol-intoxicated, in a simulated driving task.
    Leung S; Starmer G
    Accid Anal Prev; 2005 Nov; 37(6):1056-65. PubMed ID: 16036208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.