487 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17696948)
1. Silver against Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms.
Bjarnsholt T; Kirketerp-Møller K; Kristiansen S; Phipps R; Nielsen AK; Jensen PØ; Høiby N; Givskov M
APMIS; 2007 Aug; 115(8):921-8. PubMed ID: 17696948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Combinatorial activities of ionic silver and sodium hexametaphosphate against microorganisms associated with chronic wounds.
Humphreys G; Lee GL; Percival SL; McBain AJ
J Antimicrob Chemother; 2011 Nov; 66(11):2556-61. PubMed ID: 21873289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of iron depletion on antimicrobial activities against planktonic and biofilm Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Cai Y; Yu XH; Wang R; An MM; Liang BB
J Pharm Pharmacol; 2009 Sep; 61(9):1257-62. PubMed ID: 19703377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro activity of antibiotic combinations against Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm and planktonic cultures.
Tré-Hardy M; Vanderbist F; Traore H; Devleeschouwer MJ
Int J Antimicrob Agents; 2008 Apr; 31(4):329-36. PubMed ID: 18280117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bismuth-thiol incorporation enhances biological activities of liposomal tobramycin against bacterial biofilm and quorum sensing molecules production by Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Halwani M; Hebert S; Suntres ZE; Lafrenie RM; Azghani AO; Omri A
Int J Pharm; 2009 May; 373(1-2):141-6. PubMed ID: 19429299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Persister cells, the biofilm matrix and tolerance to metal cations in biofilm and planktonic Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Harrison JJ; Turner RJ; Ceri H
Environ Microbiol; 2005 Jul; 7(7):981-94. PubMed ID: 15946294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Virtual screening for novel quorum sensing inhibitors to eradicate biofilm formation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Zeng Z; Qian L; Cao L; Tan H; Huang Y; Xue X; Shen Y; Zhou S
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2008 May; 79(1):119-26. PubMed ID: 18330563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficacy of silver-releasing rubber for the prevention of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation in water.
De Prijck K; Nelis H; Coenye T
Biofouling; 2007; 23(5-6):405-11. PubMed ID: 17934912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Role of dose concentration in biocide efficacy against Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms.
Grobe KJ; Zahller J; Stewart PS
J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol; 2002 Jul; 29(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 12080421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effectiveness of honey on Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms.
Alandejani T; Marsan J; Ferris W; Slinger R; Chan F
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2009 Jul; 141(1):114-8. PubMed ID: 19559969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bacteria, biofilm and honey: a study of the effects of honey on 'planktonic' and biofilm-embedded chronic wound bacteria.
Merckoll P; Jonassen TØ; Vad ME; Jeansson SL; Melby KK
Scand J Infect Dis; 2009; 41(5):341-7. PubMed ID: 19308800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Maggot excretions/secretions are differentially effective against biofilms of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
van der Plas MJ; Jukema GN; Wai SW; Dogterom-Ballering HC; Lagendijk EL; van Gulpen C; van Dissel JT; Bloemberg GV; Nibbering PH
J Antimicrob Chemother; 2008 Jan; 61(1):117-22. PubMed ID: 17965032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Silver nanoparticles impede the biofilm formation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus epidermidis.
Kalishwaralal K; BarathManiKanth S; Pandian SR; Deepak V; Gurunathan S
Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces; 2010 Sep; 79(2):340-4. PubMed ID: 20493674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biofilm-detached cells, a transition from a sessile to a planktonic phenotype: a comparative study of adhesion and physiological characteristics in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Rollet C; Gal L; Guzzo J
FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2009 Jan; 290(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 19054076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bactericidal activity of various antibiotics against biofilm-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Abdi-Ali A; Mohammadi-Mehr M; Agha Alaei Y
Int J Antimicrob Agents; 2006 Mar; 27(3):196-200. PubMed ID: 16459057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing the effect of an antimicrobial wound dressing on biofilms.
Percival SL; Bowler P; Woods EJ
Wound Repair Regen; 2008; 16(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 18211579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An in vitro model of chronic wound biofilms to test wound dressings and assess antimicrobial susceptibilities.
Hill KE; Malic S; McKee R; Rennison T; Harding KG; Williams DW; Thomas DW
J Antimicrob Chemother; 2010 Jun; 65(6):1195-206. PubMed ID: 20378671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quorum sensing in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms.
de Kievit TR
Environ Microbiol; 2009 Feb; 11(2):279-88. PubMed ID: 19196266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro photodynamic eradication of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in planktonic and biofilm culture.
Street CN; Gibbs A; Pedigo L; Andersen D; Loebel NG
Photochem Photobiol; 2009; 85(1):137-43. PubMed ID: 18673325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A novel in vitro flat-bed perfusion biofilm model for determining the potential antimicrobial efficacy of topical wound treatments.
Thorn RM; Greenman J
J Appl Microbiol; 2009 Dec; 107(6):2070-9. PubMed ID: 19548886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
