183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17697107)
1. Dentine removal in the coronal portion of root canals following two preparation techniques.
Plotino G; Grande NM; Falanga A; Di Giuseppe IL; Lamorgese V; Somma F
Int Endod J; 2007 Nov; 40(11):852-8. PubMed ID: 17697107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of root canal preparation using RaCe and ProTaper rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
Paqué F; Musch U; Hülsmann M
Int Endod J; 2005 Jan; 38(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 15606817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. SEM evaluation of canal wall dentine following use of Mtwo and ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments.
Foschi F; Nucci C; Montebugnoli L; Marchionni S; Breschi L; Malagnino VA; Prati C
Int Endod J; 2004 Dec; 37(12):832-9. PubMed ID: 15548274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparative study of root canal preparation with NiTi-TEE and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
Jodway B; Hülsmann M
Int Endod J; 2006 Jan; 39(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 16409331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The risk of furcal perforation in mandibular molars using Gates-Glidden drills with anticurvature pressure.
Wu MK; van der Sluis LW; Wesselink PR
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Mar; 99(3):378-82. PubMed ID: 15716849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Efficacy of rotary instruments with greater taper in preparing oval root canals.
Elayouti A; Chu AL; Kimionis I; Klein C; Weiger R; Löst C
Int Endod J; 2008 Dec; 41(12):1088-92. PubMed ID: 19133098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of debris and smear layer remaining following use of ProTaper and Hero Shaper instruments in combination with NaOCl and EDTA irrigation.
Yang G; Wu H; Zheng Y; Zhang H; Li H; Zhou X
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):e63-71. PubMed ID: 18701325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The efficacy of ultrasonic irrigation to remove artificially placed dentine debris from human root canals prepared using instruments of varying taper.
van der Sluis LW; Wu MK; Wesselink PR
Int Endod J; 2005 Oct; 38(10):764-8. PubMed ID: 16164691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of root canal preparation with two rotary NiTi instruments: ProFile .04 and GT Rotary.
Rödig T; Hülsmann M; Kahlmeier C
Int Endod J; 2007 Jul; 40(7):553-62. PubMed ID: 17511784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison between a smooth wire and a K-file in removing artificially placed dentine debris from root canals in resin blocks during ultrasonic irrigation.
van der Sluis LW; Wu MK; Wesselink PR
Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):593-6. PubMed ID: 16104971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of the efficacy of conventional and new retreatment instruments to remove gutta-percha in curved root canals: an ex vivo study.
Unal GC; Kaya BU; Taç AG; Keçeci AD
Int Endod J; 2009 Apr; 42(4):344-50. PubMed ID: 19220515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Residual dentin thickness in mandibular premolars prepared with hand and rotatory instruments.
Pilo R; Corcino G; Tamse A
J Endod; 1998 Jun; 24(6):401-4. PubMed ID: 9693582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The efficacy of ultrasonic irrigation to remove artificially placed dentine debris from different-sized simulated plastic root canals.
Lee SJ; Wu MK; Wesselink PR
Int Endod J; 2004 Sep; 37(9):607-12. PubMed ID: 15317564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Thickness of dentine in mesial roots of mandibular molars with different lengths.
Sauáia TS; Gomes BP; Pinheiro ET; Zaia AA; Ferraz CC; Souza-Filho FJ; Valdrighi L
Int Endod J; 2010 Jul; 43(7):555-9. PubMed ID: 20636516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The impact of post preparation on the residual dentin thickness of maxillary molars.
Souza EM; do Nascimento LM; Maia Filho EM; Alves CM
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Sep; 106(3):184-90. PubMed ID: 21889005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Transportation of curved canals instrumented with manual and mechanical techniques.
Leonardi LE; Atlas DM; Raiden G
Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2005; 18(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 16302456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ultrastructural morphologic evaluation of root canal walls prepared by two rotary nickel-titanium systems: a comparative study.
Sabet NE; Lutfy RA
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Sep; 106(3):e59-66. PubMed ID: 18602300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative investigation of 2 rotary nickel-titanium instruments: protaper universal versus protaper.
Unal GC; Maden M; Savgat A; Onur Orhan E
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jun; 107(6):886-92. PubMed ID: 19386519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Residual dentin thickness in bifurcated maxillary first premolars after root canal and post space preparation with parallel-sided drills.
Pilo R; Shapenco E; Lewinstein I
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):267-73. PubMed ID: 18395536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of dentine thickness of middle mesial canals of mandibular molars prepared with rotary instruments: a micro-CT study.
Keles A; Keskin C; Alqawasmi R; Versiani MA
Int Endod J; 2020 Apr; 53(4):519-528. PubMed ID: 31705697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
