346 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17697248)
1. Root canal preparation with the NiTi systems K3, Mtwo and ProTaper.
Sonntag D; Ott M; Kook K; Stachniss V
Aust Endod J; 2007 Aug; 33(2):73-81. PubMed ID: 17697248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Incidence of apical crack initiation and propagation during the removal of root canal filling material with ProTaper and Mtwo rotary nickel-titanium retreatment instruments and hand files.
Topçuoğlu HS; Düzgün S; Kesim B; Tuncay O
J Endod; 2014 Jul; 40(7):1009-12. PubMed ID: 24935554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative study of 6 rotary nickel-titanium systems and hand instrumentation for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Celik D; Taşdemir T; Er K
J Endod; 2013 Feb; 39(2):278-82. PubMed ID: 23321246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative study of different novel nickel-titanium rotary systems for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals.
Capar ID; Ertas H; Ok E; Arslan H; Ertas ET
J Endod; 2014 Jun; 40(6):852-6. PubMed ID: 24862716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison among manual instruments and PathFile and Mtwo rotary instruments to create a glide path in the root canal preparation of curved canals.
Alves Vde O; Bueno CE; Cunha RS; Pinheiro SL; Fontana CE; de Martin AS
J Endod; 2012 Jan; 38(1):117-20. PubMed ID: 22152634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Root canal shaping using rotary nickel-titanium files in preclinical dental education in Turkey.
Ünal GÇ; Maden M; Orhan EO; Sarıtekin E; Teke A
J Dent Educ; 2012 Apr; 76(4):509-13. PubMed ID: 22473564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper.
Bürklein S; Hinschitza K; Dammaschke T; Schäfer E
Int Endod J; 2012 May; 45(5):449-61. PubMed ID: 22188401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ex vivo study on root canal instrumentation of two rotary nickel-titanium systems in comparison to stainless steel hand instruments.
Vaudt J; Bitter K; Neumann K; Kielbassa AM
Int Endod J; 2009 Jan; 42(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 19125977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Efficacy of ProTaper NEXT Compared with Reciproc in Removing Obturation Material from Severely Curved Root Canals: A Micro-Computed Tomography Study.
Nevares G; de Albuquerque DS; Freire LG; Romeiro K; Fogel HM; Dos Santos M; Cunha RS
J Endod; 2016 May; 42(5):803-8. PubMed ID: 27117757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of single cone obturation performance of different novel nickel-titanium rotary systems.
Capar ID; Ertas H; Ok E; Arslan H
Acta Odontol Scand; 2014 Oct; 72(7):537-42. PubMed ID: 24460041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effectiveness of two nickel-titanium rotary instruments and a hand file for removing gutta-percha in severely curved root canals during retreatment: an ex vivo study.
Gergi R; Sabbagh C
Int Endod J; 2007 Jul; 40(7):532-7. PubMed ID: 17511787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Root canal preparation of mandibular molars with 3 nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a micro-computed tomographic study.
Zhao D; Shen Y; Peng B; Haapasalo M
J Endod; 2014 Nov; 40(11):1860-4. PubMed ID: 25205262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effectiveness of a self-adjusting file to remove residual gutta-percha after retreatment with rotary files.
Abramovitz I; Relles-Bonar S; Baransi B; Kfir A
Int Endod J; 2012 Apr; 45(4):386-92. PubMed ID: 22283664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Shaping ability of BioRace, ProTaper NEXT and Genius nickel-titanium instruments in curved canals of mandibular molars: a MicroCT study.
Drukteinis S; Peciuliene V; Dummer PMH; Hupp J
Int Endod J; 2019 Jan; 52(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 29858500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rotary nickel-titanium GT and ProTaper files for root canal shaping by novice operators: a radiographic and micro-computed tomography evaluation.
Gekelman D; Ramamurthy R; Mirfarsi S; Paqué F; Peters OA
J Endod; 2009 Nov; 35(11):1584-8. PubMed ID: 19840653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative study of six rotary nickel-titanium systems and hand instrumentation for root canal preparation.
Guelzow A; Stamm O; Martus P; Kielbassa AM
Int Endod J; 2005 Oct; 38(10):743-52. PubMed ID: 16164689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radiographic identification of separated instruments retained in the apical third of root canal-filled teeth.
Rosen E; Azizi H; Friedlander C; Taschieri S; Tsesis I
J Endod; 2014 Oct; 40(10):1549-52. PubMed ID: 25159723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficacy of two Ni-Ti systems and hand files for removing gutta-percha from root canals.
Mollo A; Botti G; Prinicipi Goldoni N; Randellini E; Paragliola R; Chazine M; Ounsi HF; Grandini S
Int Endod J; 2012 Jan; 45(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 21848894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. ProTaper rotary instrument fracture during root canal preparation: a comparison between rotary and hybrid techniques.
Farid H; Khan FR; Rahman M
Oral Health Dent Manag; 2013 Mar; 12(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 23474581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficacy of D-RaCe and ProTaper Universal Retreatment NiTi instruments and hand files in removing gutta-percha from curved root canals - a micro-computed tomography study.
Rödig T; Hausdörfer T; Konietschke F; Dullin C; Hahn W; Hülsmann M
Int Endod J; 2012 Jun; 45(6):580-9. PubMed ID: 22264204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
