These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17697706)

  • 1. Evaluation of sources of uncertainties in microtensile bond strength of dental adhesive system for different specimen geometries.
    Ghassemieh E
    Dent Mater; 2008 Apr; 24(4):536-47. PubMed ID: 17697706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Laboratory and FEA evaluation of dentin-to-composite bonding as a function adhesive layer thickness.
    Coelho PG; Calamia C; Harsono M; Thompson VP; Silva NR
    Dent Mater; 2008 Oct; 24(10):1297-303. PubMed ID: 18374973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bond angle effects on microtensile bonds: laboratory and FEA comparison.
    Silva NR; Calamia CS; Harsono M; Carvalho RM; Pegoraro LF; Fernandes CA; Vieira AC; Thompson VP
    Dent Mater; 2006 Apr; 22(4):314-24. PubMed ID: 16154631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Direct comparison of the bond strength results of the different test methods: a critical literature review.
    Scherrer SS; Cesar PF; Swain MV
    Dent Mater; 2010 Feb; 26(2):e78-93. PubMed ID: 20060160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adhesion to tooth structure: a critical review of "macro" test methods.
    Braga RR; Meira JB; Boaro LC; Xavier TA
    Dent Mater; 2010 Feb; 26(2):e38-49. PubMed ID: 20004960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Finite element analysis and bond strength of a glass post to intraradicular dentin: comparison between microtensile and push-out tests.
    Soares CJ; Santana FR; Castro CG; Santos-Filho PC; Soares PV; Qian F; Armstrong SR
    Dent Mater; 2008 Oct; 24(10):1405-11. PubMed ID: 18420265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of specimen gripping device, geometry and fixation method on microtensile bond strength, failure mode and stress distribution: laboratory and finite element analyses.
    Raposo LH; Armstrong SR; Maia RR; Qian F; Geraldeli S; Soares CJ
    Dent Mater; 2012 May; 28(5):e50-62. PubMed ID: 22425572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Immediate dentin sealing supports delayed restoration placement.
    Magne P; So WS; Cascione D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Sep; 98(3):166-74. PubMed ID: 17854617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the shear bond test.
    DeHoff PH; Anusavice KJ; Wang Z
    Dent Mater; 1995 Mar; 11(2):126-31. PubMed ID: 8621033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of micro-tensile bond strengths of composite materials in comparison to their polymerization shrinkage.
    Ilie N; Kunzelmann KH; Hickel R
    Dent Mater; 2006 Jul; 22(7):593-601. PubMed ID: 16289723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison between regional micropush-out and microtensile bond strength of resin composite to dentin.
    Cekic-Nagas I; Ergun G; Nagas E; Tezvergil A; Vallittu PK; Lassila LV
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2008 Apr; 66(2):73-81. PubMed ID: 18446547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of surface area and geometry of specimens on bond strength in a microtensile test: an analysis by the three-dimensional finite element method.
    Ferreira RC; Caldas J; Paula GA; Albuquerque RC; Almeida CM; Vasconcellos WA; Caldas RB
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Aug; 20(6):456-63. PubMed ID: 21815966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of shear and tensile bond strength between dentin and ceramics using dual-polymerizing resin cements.
    Pekkan G; Hekimoglu C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):242-52. PubMed ID: 19782827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effectiveness of indirect composite resin silanization evaluated by microtensile bond strength test.
    Honda MI; Flório FM; Basting RT
    Am J Dent; 2008 Jun; 21(3):153-8. PubMed ID: 18686765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of joint component mechanical properties and adhesive layer thickness on stress distribution in micro-tensile bond strength specimens.
    Neves Ade A; Coutinho E; Poitevin A; Van der Sloten J; Van Meerbeek B; Van Oosterwyck H
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 18554711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Microtensile bond strength of self-etching adhesive systems to differently prepared dentin.
    Pangsrisomboon B; Harnirattisai C; Nilsri K; Burrow MF
    Am J Dent; 2007 Aug; 20(4):259-62. PubMed ID: 17907491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of aging treatments on microtensile bond strength of adhesive systems to primary dentin.
    Rocha R; Soares FZ; Rodrigues CR; Rodrigues Filho LE
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2007; 74(2):109-12. PubMed ID: 18477429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of direct and indirect water storage on the microtensile dentin bond strength of a total-etch and two self-etching adhesives.
    Abdalla AI; El Eraki M; Feilzer AJ
    Am J Dent; 2007 Dec; 20(6):370-4. PubMed ID: 18269127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
    Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of endodontic irrigants on the microtensile bond strength of dentin adhesives.
    Yurdagüven H; Tanalp J; Toydemir B; Mohseni K; Soyman M; Bayirli G
    J Endod; 2009 Sep; 35(9):1259-63. PubMed ID: 19720227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.