271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17698100)
1. Computer modeling technology to assess extracapsular tissue coverage of whole mount sections after retropubic and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Schellhammer PF; Diaz JI; Fabrizio MD; Davis JW; Given RW; Main B; Chaganty NR; Hussein R; McKenzie R
J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1301-5. PubMed ID: 17698100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Comparative study of surgical efficacy in open versus laparoscopic prostatectomy: virtual prostate reconstruction and periprostatic tissue quantification].
Diaz JI; Corica A; McKenzie R; Schellhammer PF
Actas Urol Esp; 2007 Oct; 31(9):1045-55. PubMed ID: 18257372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intraoperative frozen section analysis during nerve sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: feasibility study.
Fromont G; Baumert H; Cathelineau X; Rozet F; Validire P; Vallancien G
J Urol; 2003 Nov; 170(5):1843-6. PubMed ID: 14532789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Nerve-sparing open radical prostatectomy with extracapsular dissection].
Barré C; Thoulouzan M
Prog Urol; 2009 Dec; 19 Suppl 4():S177-9. PubMed ID: 20123515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transperitoneal laparoscopic prostatectomy does not increase small bowel within the target volume for postoperative radiotherapy.
Finelli A; Punnen S; Rosewall T; Catton C; Fleshner N; Jewett M; Trachtenberg J; Menard C
J Urol; 2009 Nov; 182(5):2280-4. PubMed ID: 19762047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The addition of robotic surgery to an established laparoscopic radical prostatectomy program: effect on positive surgical margins.
Trabulsi EJ; Linden RA; Gomella LG; McGinnis DE; Strup SE; Lallas CD
Can J Urol; 2008 Apr; 15(2):3994-9. PubMed ID: 18405448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of length of hospital stay between radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.
Nelson B; Kaufman M; Broughton G; Cookson MS; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Baumgartner RG; Smith JA
J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):929-31. PubMed ID: 17296378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of preoperative endorectal MRI stage classification on neurovascular bundle sparing aggressiveness and the radical prostatectomy positive margin rate.
Brown JA; Rodin DM; Harisinghani M; Dahl DM
Urol Oncol; 2009; 27(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 18640062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Nerve-sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy at Siriraj Hospital.
Srinualnad S; Nualyong C
J Med Assoc Thai; 2007 Apr; 90(4):730-6. PubMed ID: 17487128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Nerve-sparing techniques in open and laparoscopic prostatectomy.
Rodriguez E; Melamud O; Ahlering TE
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther; 2008 Mar; 8(3):475-9. PubMed ID: 18366294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: current techniques.
Levinson AW; Su LM
Curr Opin Urol; 2007 Mar; 17(2):98-103. PubMed ID: 17285018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The commonly performed nerve sparing total prostatectomy does not acknowledge the actual nerve courses.
Sievert KD; Hennenlotter J; Laible IA; Amend B; Nagele U; Stenzl A
J Urol; 2009 Mar; 181(3):1076-81. PubMed ID: 19150086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of prostate gland weight in robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Link BA; Nelson R; Josephson DY; Yoshida JS; Crocitto LE; Kawachi MH; Wilson TG
J Urol; 2008 Sep; 180(3):928-32. PubMed ID: 18635217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in clinical T1a and T1b prostate cancer: oncologic and functional outcomes--a matched-pair analysis.
Teber D; Cresswell J; Ates M; Erdogru T; Hruza M; Gözen AS; Rassweiler J
Urology; 2009 Mar; 73(3):577-81. PubMed ID: 19100598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Positive surgical margins in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the impact of apical dissection, bladder neck remodeling and nerve preservation.
Katz R; Salomon L; Hoznek A; de la Taille A; Antiphon P; Abbou CC
J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2049-52. PubMed ID: 12771716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Open, laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy: optimizing the surgical approach.
Bivalacqua TJ; Pierorazio PM; Su LM
Surg Oncol; 2009 Sep; 18(3):233-41. PubMed ID: 19286370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy: 'curtain dissection' of the neurovascular bundle.
Lunacek A; Schwentner C; Fritsch H; Bartsch G; Strasser H
BJU Int; 2005 Jun; 95(9):1226-31. PubMed ID: 15892806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of magnetic resonance imaging in the decision to preserve or resect neurovascular bundles at robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Park BH; Jeon HG; Jeong BC; Seo SI; Lee HM; Choi HY; Jeon SS
J Urol; 2014 Jul; 192(1):82-8. PubMed ID: 24440235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Anatomic distribution of periprostatic adipose tissue: a mapping study of 100 radical prostatectomy specimens.
Hong H; Koch MO; Foster RS; Bihrle R; Gardner TA; Fyffe J; Ulbright TM; Eble JN; Cheng L
Cancer; 2003 Apr; 97(7):1639-43. PubMed ID: 12655520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
