713 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17698131)
1. Predicting unilateral prostate cancer based on biopsy features: implications for focal ablative therapy--results from the SEARCH database.
Scales CD; Presti JC; Kane CJ; Terris MK; Aronson WJ; Amling CL; Freedland SJ;
J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1249-52. PubMed ID: 17698131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improved clinical staging system combining biopsy laterality and TNM stage for men with T1c and T2 prostate cancer: results from the SEARCH database.
Freedland SJ; Presti JC; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Aronson WJ; Dorey F; Amling CL;
J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2129-35. PubMed ID: 12771734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Percent of prostate needle biopsy cores with cancer is significant independent predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence following radical prostatectomy: results from SEARCH database.
Freedland SJ; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Dorey F; Presti JC;
J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2136-41. PubMed ID: 12771735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The percentage of prostate needle biopsy cores with carcinoma from the more involved side of the biopsy as a predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) database.
Freedland SJ; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Dorey F; Presti JC
Cancer; 2003 Dec; 98(11):2344-50. PubMed ID: 14635068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical and pathologic outcome after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer patients with a preoperative Gleason sum of 8 to 10.
Bastian PJ; Gonzalgo ML; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Presti JC; Mangold LA; Humphreys E; Epstein JI; Partin AW; Freedland SJ
Cancer; 2006 Sep; 107(6):1265-72. PubMed ID: 16900523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Obesity and oncological outcome after radical prostatectomy: impact of prostate-specific antigen-based prostate cancer screening: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital and Duke Prostate Center databases.
Freedland SJ; Sun L; Kane CJ; Presti JC; Terris MK; Amling CL; Moul JW; Aronson WJ
BJU Int; 2008 Sep; 102(8):969-74. PubMed ID: 18691175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Unilateral positive biopsies in low risk prostate cancer patients diagnosed with extended transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy schemes do not predict unilateral prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy.
Gallina A; Maccagnano C; Suardi N; Capitanio U; Abdollah F; Raber M; Salonia A; Scattoni V; Rigatti P; Montorsi F; Briganti A
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(2 Pt 2):E64-8. PubMed ID: 22093108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Relationship between systematic biopsies and histological features of 222 radical prostatectomy specimens: lack of prediction of tumor significance for men with nonpalpable prostate cancer.
Noguchi M; Stamey TA; McNeal JE; Yemoto CM
J Urol; 2001 Jul; 166(1):104-9; discussion 109-10. PubMed ID: 11435833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Can contemporary transrectal prostate biopsy accurately select candidates for hemi-ablative focal therapy of prostate cancer?
Tareen B; Godoy G; Sankin A; Temkin S; Lepor H; Taneja SS
BJU Int; 2009 Jul; 104(2):195-9. PubMed ID: 19191784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pathological outcomes and biochemical progression in men with T1c prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy with prostate specific antigen 2.6 to 4.0 vs 4.1 to 6.0 ng/ml.
Makarov DV; Humphreys EB; Mangold LA; Walsh PC; Partin AW; Epstein JI; Freedland SJ
J Urol; 2006 Aug; 176(2):554-8. PubMed ID: 16813888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biopsy core number represents one of foremost predictors of clinically significant gleason sum upgrading in patients with low-risk prostate cancer.
Capitanio U; Karakiewicz PI; Valiquette L; Perrotte P; Jeldres C; Briganti A; Gallina A; Suardi N; Cestari A; Guazzoni G; Salonia A; Montorsi F
Urology; 2009 May; 73(5):1087-91. PubMed ID: 19195695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Unilateral prostate cancer cannot be accurately predicted in low-risk patients.
Isbarn H; Karakiewicz PI; Vogel S; Jeldres C; Lughezzani G; Briganti A; Montorsi F; Perrotte P; Ahyai SA; Budäus L; Eichelberg C; Heuer R; Köllermann J; Sauter G; Schlomm T; Steuber T; Haese A; Zacharias M; Fisch M; Heinzer H; Huland H; Chun FK; Graefen M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2010 Jul; 77(3):784-7. PubMed ID: 19864083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validity of the CAPRA score to predict biochemical recurrence-free survival after radical prostatectomy. Results from a european multicenter survey of 1,296 patients.
May M; Knoll N; Siegsmund M; Fahlenkamp D; Vogler H; Hoschke B; Gralla O
J Urol; 2007 Nov; 178(5):1957-62; discussion 1962. PubMed ID: 17868719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prediction of extraprostatic extension in the neurovascular bundle based on prostate needle biopsy pathology, serum prostate specific antigen and digital rectal examination.
Tsuzuki T; Hernandez DJ; Aydin H; Trock B; Walsh PC; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2005 Feb; 173(2):450-3. PubMed ID: 15643200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prognostic significance of tumor volume in radical prostatectomy and needle biopsy specimens.
Epstein JI
J Urol; 2011 Sep; 186(3):790-7. PubMed ID: 21788055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Gleason score 7 prostate cancer on needle biopsy: is the prognostic difference in Gleason scores 4 + 3 and 3 + 4 independent of the number of involved cores?
Makarov DV; Sanderson H; Partin AW; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2002 Jun; 167(6):2440-2. PubMed ID: 11992053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Preoperative prediction of small volume cancer (less than 0.5 ml) in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Cheng L; Poulos CK; Pan CX; Jones TD; Daggy JK; Eble JN; Koch MO
J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):898-902. PubMed ID: 16093983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Delay of radical prostatectomy and risk of biochemical progression in men with low risk prostate cancer.
Freedland SJ; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Aronson WJ; Presti JC; Terris MK;
J Urol; 2006 Apr; 175(4):1298-302; discussion 1302-3. PubMed ID: 16515984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The relationship between tumor volume and the number of positive cores in men undergoing multisite extended biopsy: implication for expectant management.
Ochiai A; Troncoso P; Chen ME; Lloreta J; Babaian RJ
J Urol; 2005 Dec; 174(6):2164-8, discussion 2168. PubMed ID: 16280756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A single microfocus (5% or less) of Gleason 6 prostate cancer at biopsy--can we predict adverse pathological outcomes?
Thong AE; Shikanov S; Katz MH; Gofrit ON; Eggener S; Zagaja GP; Shalhav AL; Zorn KC
J Urol; 2008 Dec; 180(6):2436-40. PubMed ID: 18930486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
