732 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17698141)
1. The significance of positive surgical margin in areas of capsular incision in otherwise organ confined disease at radical prostatectomy.
Chuang AY; Nielsen ME; Hernandez DJ; Walsh PC; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1306-10. PubMed ID: 17698141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Adverse prognostic significance of capsular incision with radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Shuford MD; Cookson MS; Chang SS; Shintani AK; Tsiatis A; Smith JA; Shappell SB
J Urol; 2004 Jul; 172(1):119-23. PubMed ID: 15201750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A pathological reassessment of organ-confined, Gleason score 6 prostatic adenocarcinomas that progress after radical prostatectomy.
Miyamoto H; Hernandez DJ; Epstein JI
Hum Pathol; 2009 Dec; 40(12):1693-8. PubMed ID: 19683331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Swindle P; Eastham JA; Ohori M; Kattan MW; Wheeler T; Maru N; Slawin K; Scardino PT
J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):903-7. PubMed ID: 16093984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Disease progression following radical prostatectomy in men with Gleason score 7 tumor.
Epstein JI; Pound CR; Partin AW; Walsh PC
J Urol; 1998 Jul; 160(1):97-100; discussion 101. PubMed ID: 9628613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of patient age on biochemical recurrence rates following radical prostatectomy.
Magheli A; Rais-Bahrami S; Humphreys EB; Peck HJ; Trock BJ; Gonzalgo ML
J Urol; 2007 Nov; 178(5):1933-7; discussion 1937-8. PubMed ID: 17868723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Subclassification of clinical stage T1 prostate cancer: impact on biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy.
Magheli A; Rais-Bahrami S; Carter HB; Peck HJ; Epstein JI; Gonzalgo ML
J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1277-80; discussion 1280-1. PubMed ID: 17698121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Importance of tumor location in patients with high preoperative prostate specific antigen levels (greater than 20 ng/ml) treated with radical prostatectomy.
Magheli A; Rais-Bahrami S; Peck HJ; Walsh PC; Epstein JI; Trock BJ; Gonzalgo ML
J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1311-5. PubMed ID: 17698095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Caveolin-1 expression is a predictor of recurrence-free survival in pT2N0 prostate carcinoma diagnosed in Japanese patients.
Satoh T; Yang G; Egawa S; Addai J; Frolov A; Kuwao S; Timme TL; Baba S; Thompson TC
Cancer; 2003 Mar; 97(5):1225-33. PubMed ID: 12599229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lack of association of prostate carcinoma nuclear grading with prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Zhou M; Hayasaka S; Taylor JM; Shah R; Proverbs-Singh T; Manley S; Rubin MA
J Urol; 2001 Dec; 166(6):2193-7. PubMed ID: 11696734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Importance of margin extent as a predictor of outcome after adjuvant radiotherapy for Gleason score 7 pT3N0 prostate cancer.
Valicenti RK; Chervoneva I; Gomella LG
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Mar; 58(4):1093-7. PubMed ID: 15001249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Positive surgical margins in areas of capsular incision in otherwise organ-confined disease at radical prostatectomy: histologic features and pitfalls.
Chuang AY; Epstein JI
Am J Surg Pathol; 2008 Aug; 32(8):1201-6. PubMed ID: 18580493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The actual value of the surgical margin status as a predictor of disease progression in men with early prostate cancer.
Vis AN; Schröder FH; van der Kwast TH
Eur Urol; 2006 Aug; 50(2):258-65. PubMed ID: 16413660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Positive proximal (bladder neck) margin at radical prostatectomy confers greater risk of biochemical progression.
Aydin H; Tsuzuki T; Hernandez D; Walsh PC; Partin AW; Epstein JI
Urology; 2004 Sep; 64(3):551-5. PubMed ID: 15351591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Percent tumor involvement and risk of biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy.
Rampersaud EN; Sun L; Moul JW; Madden J; Freedland SJ
J Urol; 2008 Aug; 180(2):571-6; discussion 576. PubMed ID: 18554662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prostate specific antigen recurrence rates are low after radical retropubic prostatectomy and positive margins.
Simon MA; Kim S; Soloway MS
J Urol; 2006 Jan; 175(1):140-4; discussion 144-5. PubMed ID: 16406892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lymphovascular invasion is an independent prognostic factor in prostatic adenocarcinoma.
Cheng L; Jones TD; Lin H; Eble JN; Zeng G; Carr MD; Koch MO
J Urol; 2005 Dec; 174(6):2181-5. PubMed ID: 16280760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer: biochemical outcome.
Kawamorita N; Saito S; Ishidoya S; Ito A; Saito H; Kato M; Arai Y
Int J Urol; 2009 Sep; 16(9):733-8. PubMed ID: 19674167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The relationship between the extent of surgical margin positivity and prostate specific antigen recurrence in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Marks RA; Koch MO; Lopez-Beltran A; Montironi R; Juliar BE; Cheng L
Hum Pathol; 2007 Aug; 38(8):1207-11. PubMed ID: 17490720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Natural history of biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy based on length of a positive margin.
Ochiai A; Sotelo T; Troncoso P; Bhadkamkar V; Babaian RJ
Urology; 2008 Feb; 71(2):308-12. PubMed ID: 18308109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
