These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17698749)

  • 41. Vision-Specific Quality of Life: Laser-Assisted in situ Keratomileusis Versus Overnight Contact Lens Wear.
    González-Pérez J; Sánchez García Á; Villa-Collar C
    Eye Contact Lens; 2019 Jan; 45(1):34-39. PubMed ID: 30048340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Risk factors for night vision complaints after LASIK for myopia.
    Pop M; Payette Y
    Ophthalmology; 2004 Jan; 111(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 14711706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A comparison of visual acuity, predictability, and visual function outcomes after intracorneal ring segments and laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Suiter BG; Twa MD; Ruckhofer J; Schanzlin DJ
    Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 2000; 98():51-5; discussion 55-7. PubMed ID: 11190040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Role of depressive symptoms in patient satisfaction with visual quality after laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Morse JS; Schallhorn SC; Hettinger K; Tanzer D
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Feb; 35(2):341-6. PubMed ID: 19185253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Outcomes of wavefront-optimized surface ablation.
    Randleman JB; Loft ES; Banning CS; Lynn MJ; Stulting RD
    Ophthalmology; 2007 May; 114(5):983-8. PubMed ID: 17337064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Effectiveness of laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy to treat residual refractive errors after laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Cagil N; Aydin B; Ozturk S; Hasiripi H
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Apr; 33(4):642-7. PubMed ID: 17397737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Patient satisfaction and visual symptoms after laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Bailey MD; Mitchell GL; Dhaliwal DK; Boxer Wachler BS; Zadnik K
    Ophthalmology; 2003 Jul; 110(7):1371-8. PubMed ID: 12867394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Wavefront-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis for patients with myopia: a prospective randomized contralateral eye study.
    He L; Liu A; Manche EE
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jun; 157(6):1170-1178.e1. PubMed ID: 24560995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Comparison of higher-order aberrations after wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis and laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy.
    Chung SH; Lee IS; Lee YG; Lee HK; Kim EK; Yoon G; Seo KY
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 May; 32(5):779-84. PubMed ID: 16765794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Topographically guided laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia using a customized aspherical treatment zone.
    Dougherty PJ; Waring G; Chayet A; Fischer J; Fant B; Bains HS
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Nov; 34(11):1862-71. PubMed ID: 19006731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Laser in situ keratomileusis for residual refractive errors after apodized diffractive multifocal intraocular lens implantation.
    Muftuoglu O; Prasher P; Chu C; Mootha VV; Verity SM; Cavanagh HD; Bowman RW; McCulley JP
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Jun; 35(6):1063-71. PubMed ID: 19465293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Safety, efficacy, and predictability of laser in situ keratomileusis to correct myopia or myopic astigmatism with a 750 Hz scanning-spot laser system.
    Tomita M; Watabe M; Yukawa S; Nakamura N; Nakamura T; Magnago T
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Feb; 40(2):251-8. PubMed ID: 24345530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Retrospective evaluation of the influence of pupil size on visual acuity after KAMRA inlay implantation.
    Tomita M; Kanamori T; Waring GO; Huseynova T
    J Refract Surg; 2014 Jul; 30(7):448-53. PubMed ID: 24983830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Responsiveness of the National Eye Institute Refractive Error Quality of Life instrument to surgical correction of refractive error.
    McDonnell PJ; Mangione C; Lee P; Lindblad AS; Spritzer KL; Berry S; Hays RD
    Ophthalmology; 2003 Dec; 110(12):2302-9. PubMed ID: 14644711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effect of pupil size on visual function under monocular and binocular conditions in LASIK and non-LASIK patients.
    Boxer Wachler BS
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2003 Feb; 29(2):275-8. PubMed ID: 12648637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Lasik, PRK and quality of vision: a study of prognostic factors and a satisfaction survey].
    Saragoussi D; Saragoussi JJ
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2004 Sep; 27(7):755-64. PubMed ID: 15499272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Psychometric properties of the National Eye Institute-Refractive Error Quality of Life instrument.
    Hays RD; Mangione CM; Ellwein L; Lindblad AS; Spritzer KL; McDonnell PJ
    Ophthalmology; 2003 Dec; 110(12):2292-301. PubMed ID: 14644710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Reliability and validity of refractive error-specific quality-of-life instruments.
    Nichols JJ; Mitchell GL; Saracino M; Zadnik K
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2003 Sep; 121(9):1289-96. PubMed ID: 12963612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Reduction of pupil size and halos with minus lenses after laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Wachler BS; Hiatt D; Chou B; Christie JP
    J Refract Surg; 2004; 20(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 15072314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Evaluation of the impact of refractive surgery on quality of life using the NEI-RQL (National Eye Institute Refractive Error Quality of Life) instrument].
    Nunes LM; Schor P
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2005; 68(6):789-96. PubMed ID: 17344981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.