These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17698934)

  • 1. A general approach to evaluating agreement between two observers or methods of measurement from quantitative data with replicated measurements.
    Haber M; Barnhart HX
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2008 Apr; 17(2):151-69. PubMed ID: 17698934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing observer agreement in studies involving replicated binary observations.
    Haber M; Gao J; Barnhart HX
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(4):757-66. PubMed ID: 17613652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A new permutation-based method for assessing agreement between two observers making replicated quantitative readings.
    Pan Y; Haber M; Gao J; Barnhart HX
    Stat Med; 2012 Sep; 31(20):2249-61. PubMed ID: 22415910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How reproducibly can human ear ossicles be measured? A study of inter-observer error.
    Flohr S; Leckelt J; Kierdorf U; Kierdorf H
    Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2010 Dec; 293(12):2094-106. PubMed ID: 21046668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability of a semi-quantitative method for dermal exposure assessment (DREAM).
    van Wendel de Joode B; van Hemmen JJ; Meijster T; Major V; London L; Kromhout H
    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 2005 Jan; 15(1):111-20. PubMed ID: 15069425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The comparison of clinical imaging devices with respect to parallel readings in both devices.
    Krummenauer F
    Eur J Med Res; 2006 Mar; 11(3):119-22. PubMed ID: 16751112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A novel approach for quantitative analysis of intracoronary optical coherence tomography: high inter-observer agreement with computer-assisted contour detection.
    Tanimoto S; Rodriguez-Granillo G; Barlis P; de Winter S; Bruining N; Hamers R; Knappen M; Verheye S; Serruys PW; Regar E
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 Aug; 72(2):228-35. PubMed ID: 18324698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Overview of agreement statistics for medical devices.
    Lin L
    J Biopharm Stat; 2008; 18(1):126-44. PubMed ID: 18161545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability analysis for continuous measurements: equivalence test for agreement.
    Yi Q; Wang PP; He Y
    Stat Med; 2008 Jul; 27(15):2816-25. PubMed ID: 17985364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The reliability of human odontometric data.
    Kieser JA; Groeneveld HT
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1991 May; 46(5):267-70. PubMed ID: 1962316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automatic algorithm for monitoring systolic pressure variation and difference in pulse pressure.
    Pestel G; Fukui K; Hartwich V; Schumacher PM; Vogt A; Hiltebrand LB; Kurz A; Fujita Y; Inderbitzin D; Leibundgut D
    Anesth Analg; 2009 Jun; 108(6):1823-9. PubMed ID: 19448207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measures of agreement for vectorcardiography data.
    Wang H
    Stat Med; 2009 Mar; 28(7):1093-107. PubMed ID: 19125392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A graphical method for assessing agreement with the mean between multiple observers using continuous measures.
    Jones M; Dobson A; O'Brian S
    Int J Epidemiol; 2011 Oct; 40(5):1308-13. PubMed ID: 21737402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing intrarater, interrater and test-retest reliability of continuous measurements.
    Rousson V; Gasser T; Seifert B
    Stat Med; 2002 Nov; 21(22):3431-46. PubMed ID: 12407682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measurement variation in method comparison studies: an empirical examination.
    Ottenbacher KJ; Tomchek SD
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1994 May; 75(5):505-12. PubMed ID: 8185441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of disagreement: a new information-based approach.
    Costa-Santos C; Antunes L; Souto A; Bernardes J
    Ann Epidemiol; 2010 Jul; 20(7):555-61. PubMed ID: 20538199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modelling patterns of agreement for nominal scales.
    Roberts C
    Stat Med; 2008 Mar; 27(6):810-30. PubMed ID: 17634968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inter-observer agreement in the estimation of bladder pressure using a penile cuff.
    Drinnan MJ; McIntosh SL; Robson WA; Pickard RS; Ramsden PD; Griffiths CJ
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2003; 22(4):296-300. PubMed ID: 12808703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diagnosis of peripheral arterial disease in general practice: can the ankle-brachial index be measured either by pulse palpation or an automatic blood pressure device?
    Aboyans V; Lacroix P; Doucet S; Preux PM; Criqui MH; Laskar M
    Int J Clin Pract; 2008 Jul; 62(7):1001-7. PubMed ID: 18462371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Coefficients of agreement for fixed observers.
    Haber M; Barnhart HX
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2006 Jun; 15(3):255-71. PubMed ID: 16768299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.