112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17699069)
1. Detection of low frequency external electronic identification devices using commercial panel readers.
Stewart SC; Rapnicki P; Lewis JR; Perala M
J Dairy Sci; 2007 Sep; 90(9):4478-82. PubMed ID: 17699069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Read distance performance and variation of 5 low-frequency radio frequency identification panel transceiver manufacturers.
Ryan SE; Blasi DA; Anglin CO; Bryant AM; Rickard BA; Anderson MP; Fike KE
J Anim Sci; 2010 Jul; 88(7):2514-22. PubMed ID: 20407068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Lifetime traceability of weaner pigs in concrete-based and deep-litter production systems in Australia.
Schembri N; Sithole F; Toribio JA; Hernández-Jover M; Holyoake PK
J Anim Sci; 2007 Nov; 85(11):3123-30. PubMed ID: 17686903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of visual and electronic identification devices in pigs: on-farm performances.
Babot D; Hernández-Jover M; Caja G; Santamarina C; Ghirardi JJ
J Anim Sci; 2006 Sep; 84(9):2575-81. PubMed ID: 16908663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-term performance of visual and electronic identification devices in dairy goats.
Carné S; Caja G; Ghirardi JJ; Salama AA
J Dairy Sci; 2009 Apr; 92(4):1500-11. PubMed ID: 19307631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Traceability of extensively produced Iberian pigs using visual and electronic identification devices from farm to slaughter.
Gosálvez LF; Santamarina C; Averós X; Hernández-Jover M; Caja G; Babot D
J Anim Sci; 2007 Oct; 85(10):2746-52. PubMed ID: 17609464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of visual and electronic identification devices in pigs: slaughterhouse performance.
Santamarina C; Hernández-Jover M; Babot D; Caja G
J Anim Sci; 2007 Feb; 85(2):497-502. PubMed ID: 17235033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Readability of visual and electronic leg tags versus rumen boluses and electronic ear tags for the permanent identification of dairy goats.
Carné S; Caja G; Rojas-Olivares MA; Salama AA
J Dairy Sci; 2010 Nov; 93(11):5157-66. PubMed ID: 20965331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. IDEA: a large-scale project on electronic identification of livestock.
Ribó O; Korn C; Meloni U; Cropper M; De Winne P; Cuypers M
Rev Sci Tech; 2001 Aug; 20(2):426-36. PubMed ID: 11548517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Short communication: Long-term survival of flag eartags on an Israeli dairy farm.
Seroussi E; Yakobson E; Garazi S; Oved Z; Halachmi I
J Dairy Sci; 2011 Nov; 94(11):5533-5. PubMed ID: 22032376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the retention of electronic identification boluses in the forestomachs of cattle.
Ghirardi JJ; Caja G; Garín D; Casellas J; Hernández-Jover M
J Anim Sci; 2006 Aug; 84(8):2260-8. PubMed ID: 16864888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Extended field test on the use of visual ear tags and electronic boluses for the identification of different goat breeds in the United States.
Carné S; Gipson TA; Rovai M; Merkel RC; Caja G
J Anim Sci; 2009 Jul; 87(7):2419-27. PubMed ID: 19329484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hierarchy of factors affecting behavioural signs used for oestrus detection of Holstein and Normande dairy cows in a seasonal calving system.
Cutullic E; Delaby L; Causeur D; Michel G; Disenhaus C
Anim Reprod Sci; 2009 Jul; 113(1-4):22-37. PubMed ID: 18771863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Agreement of predicted 305-day milk yields relative to actual 305-day milk weight yields.
Quist MA; LeBlanc SJ; Hand KJ; Lazenby D; Miglior F; Kelton DF
J Dairy Sci; 2007 Oct; 90(10):4684-92. PubMed ID: 17881690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Functionality of veterinary identification microchips following low- (0.5 tesla) and high-field (3 tesla) magnetic resonance imaging.
Piesnack S; Frame ME; Oechtering G; Ludewig E
Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2013; 54(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 23763334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. On the use of physical activity monitoring for estrus detection in dairy cows.
Løvendahl P; Chagunda MG
J Dairy Sci; 2010 Jan; 93(1):249-59. PubMed ID: 20059923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vivo mechanical and in vitro electromagnetic side-effects of a ruminal transponder in cattle.
Antonini C; Trabalza-Marinucci M; Franceschini R; Mughetti L; Acuti G; Faba A; Asdrubali G; Boiti C
J Anim Sci; 2006 Nov; 84(11):3133-42. PubMed ID: 17032809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Technical note: validation of a system for monitoring individual feeding and drinking behavior and intake in group-housed cattle.
Chapinal N; Veira DM; Weary DM; von Keyserlingk MA
J Dairy Sci; 2007 Dec; 90(12):5732-6. PubMed ID: 18024766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reproductive challenges facing the cattle industry at the beginning of the 21st century.
Sheldon IM; Dobson H
Reprod Suppl; 2003; 61():1-13. PubMed ID: 14635922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Suitability of electronic mini-boluses for early identification of lambs.
Ghirardi JJ; Caja G; Flores C; Garín D; Hernández-Jover M; Bocquier F
J Anim Sci; 2007 Jan; 85(1):248-57. PubMed ID: 17179563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
