These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17700243)

  • 1. Can DAGs clarify effect modification?
    Weinberg CR
    Epidemiology; 2007 Sep; 18(5):569-72. PubMed ID: 17700243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Four types of effect modification: a classification based on directed acyclic graphs.
    VanderWeele TJ; Robins JM
    Epidemiology; 2007 Sep; 18(5):561-8. PubMed ID: 17700242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) - the application of causal diagrams in epidemiology].
    Schipf S; Knüppel S; Hardt J; Stang A
    Gesundheitswesen; 2011 Dec; 73(12):888-92. PubMed ID: 22193898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Causality in objective world: Directed Acyclic Graphs-based structural parsing].
    Zheng YJ; Zhao NQ; He YN
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Jan; 39(1):90-93. PubMed ID: 29374904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Causal inference in cumulative risk assessment: The roles of directed acyclic graphs.
    Brewer LE; Wright JM; Rice G; Neas L; Teuschler L
    Environ Int; 2017 May; 102():30-41. PubMed ID: 27988137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. DAG With Omitted Objects Displayed (DAGWOOD): a framework for revealing causal assumptions in DAGs.
    Haber NA; Wood ME; Wieten S; Breskin A
    Ann Epidemiol; 2022 Apr; 68():64-71. PubMed ID: 35124197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Combining directed acyclic graphs and the change-in-estimate procedure as a novel approach to adjustment-variable selection in epidemiology.
    Evans D; Chaix B; Lobbedez T; Verger C; Flahault A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Oct; 12():156. PubMed ID: 23058038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Graphical presentation of confounding in directed acyclic graphs.
    Suttorp MM; Siegerink B; Jager KJ; Zoccali C; Dekker FW
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2015 Sep; 30(9):1418-23. PubMed ID: 25324358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Directed acyclic graphs, sufficient causes, and the properties of conditioning on a common effect.
    VanderWeele TJ; Robins JM
    Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Nov; 166(9):1096-104. PubMed ID: 17702973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Causal Inference in Medicine Part II. Directed acyclic graphs--a useful method for confounder selection, categorization of potential biases, and hypothesis specification].
    Suzuki E; Komatsu H; Yorifuji T; Yamamoto E; Doi H; Tsuda T
    Nihon Eiseigaku Zasshi; 2009 Sep; 64(4):796-805. PubMed ID: 19797848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dependence of confounding on the target population: a modification of causal graphs to account for co-action.
    Flanders WD; Johnson CY; Howards PP; Greenland S
    Ann Epidemiol; 2011 Sep; 21(9):698-705. PubMed ID: 21737305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evidence synthesis for constructing directed acyclic graphs (ESC-DAGs): a novel and systematic method for building directed acyclic graphs.
    Ferguson KD; McCann M; Katikireddi SV; Thomson H; Green MJ; Smith DJ; Lewsey JD
    Int J Epidemiol; 2020 Feb; 49(1):322-329. PubMed ID: 31325312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robust causal inference using directed acyclic graphs: the R package 'dagitty'.
    Textor J; van der Zander B; Gilthorpe MS; Liskiewicz M; Ellison GT
    Int J Epidemiol; 2016 Dec; 45(6):1887-1894. PubMed ID: 28089956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Causal Diagrams: Pitfalls and Tips.
    Suzuki E; Shinozaki T; Yamamoto E
    J Epidemiol; 2020 Apr; 30(4):153-162. PubMed ID: 32009103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) - basic concepts and application of an approach for causal analyses in epidemiology].
    Hardt J; Brendler C; Greiser KH; Timmer A; Seidler A; Weikert C; Latza U
    Gesundheitswesen; 2011 Dec; 73(12):878-9. PubMed ID: 22193895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reducing bias through directed acyclic graphs.
    Shrier I; Platt RW
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2008 Oct; 8():70. PubMed ID: 18973665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Can we believe the DAGs? A comment on the relationship between causal DAGs and mechanisms.
    Aalen OO; Røysland K; Gran JM; Kouyos R; Lange T
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Oct; 25(5):2294-2314. PubMed ID: 24463886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Directed acyclic graphs: languages, rules and applications].
    Zheng YJ; Zhao NQ
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Aug; 38(8):1140-1144. PubMed ID: 28847071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Directed Acyclic Graphs, Effect Measure Modification, and Generalizability.
    Webster-Clark M; Breskin A
    Am J Epidemiol; 2021 Feb; 190(2):322-327. PubMed ID: 32840557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) to identify confounders in applied health research: review and recommendations.
    Tennant PWG; Murray EJ; Arnold KF; Berrie L; Fox MP; Gadd SC; Harrison WJ; Keeble C; Ranker LR; Textor J; Tomova GD; Gilthorpe MS; Ellison GTH
    Int J Epidemiol; 2021 May; 50(2):620-632. PubMed ID: 33330936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.