547 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17700335)
1. Applying multilevel item response theory to vision-related quality of life in Dutch visually impaired elderly.
van Nispen RM; Knol DL; Langelaan M; de Boer MR; Terwee CB; van Rens GH
Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Aug; 84(8):710-20. PubMed ID: 17700335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A multilevel item response theory model was investigated for longitudinal vision-related quality-of-life data.
van Nispen RM; Knol DL; Neve HJ; van Rens GH
J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Mar; 63(3):321-30. PubMed ID: 19766455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outcomes of low-vision services using optometric and multidisciplinary approaches: a non-randomized comparison.
de Boer MR; Twisk J; Moll AC; Völker-Dieben HJ; de Vet HC; van Rens GH
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2006 Nov; 26(6):535-44. PubMed ID: 17040417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Changes to the subscales of two vision-related quality of life questionnaires are proposed.
de Boer MR; de Vet HC; Terwee CB; Moll AC; Völker-Dieben HJ; van Rens GH
J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Dec; 58(12):1260-8. PubMed ID: 16291470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Measuring low-vision rehabilitation outcomes with the NEI VFQ-25.
Stelmack JA; Stelmack TR; Massof RW
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Sep; 43(9):2859-68. PubMed ID: 12202503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reading performance with low-vision aids and vision-related quality of life after macular translocation surgery in patients with age-related macular degeneration.
Nguyen NX; Besch D; Bartz-Schmidt K; Gelisken F; Trauzettel-Klosinski S
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2007 Dec; 85(8):877-82. PubMed ID: 17651462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of general health status on validity of visual impairment measurement.
Ahmadian L; Massof R
Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2008; 15(5):345-55. PubMed ID: 18850472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Measuring outcomes of vision rehabilitation with the Veterans Affairs Low Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire.
Stelmack JA; Szlyk JP; Stelmack TR; Demers-Turco P; Williams RT; Moran D; Massof RW
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 47(8):3253-61. PubMed ID: 16877389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Vision and quality of life: the development of a utility measure.
Misajon R; Hawthorne G; Richardson J; Barton J; Peacock S; Iezzi A; Keeffe J
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Nov; 46(11):4007-15. PubMed ID: 16249474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Vision-related quality of life Core Measure (VCM1) showed low-impact differential item functioning between groups with different administration modes.
van Nispen RM; Knol DL; Mokkink LB; Comijs HC; Deeg DJ; van Rens GH
J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Nov; 63(11):1232-41. PubMed ID: 20413266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Using the VA LV VFQ-48 and LV VFQ-20 in low vision rehabilitation.
Stelmack JA; Massof RW
Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Aug; 84(8):705-9. PubMed ID: 17700334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of vision impairment questionnaire: an assessment of its domain structure using confirmatory factor analysis and rasch analysis.
Lamoureux EL; Pallant JF; Pesudovs K; Rees G; Hassell JB; Keeffe JE
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 48(3):1001-6. PubMed ID: 17325138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An evaluation of the 10-item vision core measure 1 (VCM1) scale (the Core Module of the Vision-Related Quality of Life scale) using Rasch analysis.
Lamoureux EL; Pesudovs K; Pallant JF; Rees G; Hassell JB; Caudle LE; Keeffe JE
Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2008; 15(4):224-33. PubMed ID: 18780255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effectiveness of low-vision rehabilitation on participation in daily living and quality of life.
Lamoureux EL; Pallant JF; Pesudovs K; Rees G; Hassell JB; Keeffe JE
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Apr; 48(4):1476-82. PubMed ID: 17389474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Development and evaluation of psychometric tests of the Chinese-version of low vision quality of life questionnaire].
Zou HD; Zhang X; Xu X; Bai L
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Mar; 41(3):246-51. PubMed ID: 15840368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing participation in daily living and the effectiveness of rehabiliation in age related macular degeneration patients using the impact of vision impairment scale.
Lamoureux EL; Pallant JF; Pesudovs K; Tennant A; Rees G; O'Connor PM; Keeffe JE
Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2008; 15(2):105-13. PubMed ID: 18432494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Psychometric properties of the Veterans Affairs Low-Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire.
Stelmack JA; Szlyk JP; Stelmack TR; Demers-Turco P; Williams RT; Moran D; Massof RW
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Nov; 45(11):3919-28. PubMed ID: 15505037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Randomized controlled trial on the effects of CCTV training on quality of life, depression, and adaptation to vision loss.
Burggraaff MC; van Nispen RM; Knol DL; Ringens PJ; van Rens GH
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Jun; 53(7):3645-52. PubMed ID: 22562505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Impact of Vision Impairment Questionnaire: an evaluation of its measurement properties using Rasch analysis.
Lamoureux EL; Pallant JF; Pesudovs K; Hassell JB; Keeffe JE
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Nov; 47(11):4732-41. PubMed ID: 17065481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Are standard instruments valid for the assessment of quality of life and symptoms in glaucoma?
Lamoureux EL; Ferraro JG; Pallant JF; Pesudovs K; Rees G; Keeffe JE
Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Aug; 84(8):789-96. PubMed ID: 17700342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
