These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17700445)

  • 1. Modified techniques to prevent sagittal imbalance after cervical arthroplasty.
    Yi S; Shin HC; Kim KN; Park HK; Jang IT; Yoon DH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Aug; 32(18):1986-91. PubMed ID: 17700445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of modified techniques in Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty.
    Xu JX; Zhang YZ; Shen Y; Ding WY
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(10):1012-7. PubMed ID: 19404176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of a cervical disc prosthesis on maintaining sagittal alignment of the functional spinal unit and overall sagittal balance of the cervical spine.
    Kim SW; Shin JH; Arbatin JJ; Park MS; Chung YK; McAfee PC
    Eur Spine J; 2008 Jan; 17(1):20-9. PubMed ID: 17721713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical and radiological results following cervical arthroplasty.
    Yoon DH; Yi S; Shin HC; Kim KN; Kim SH
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2006 Sep; 148(9):943-50. PubMed ID: 16791434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sagittal alignment after Bryan cervical arthroplasty.
    Sasso RC; Metcalf NH; Hipp JA; Wharton ND; Anderson PA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jun; 36(13):991-6. PubMed ID: 21358477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of a cervical disc prosthesis on segmental and cervical spine alignment.
    Pickett GE; Mitsis DK; Sekhon LH; Sears WR; Duggal N
    Neurosurg Focus; 2004 Sep; 17(3):E5. PubMed ID: 15636561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of factors that may influence range of motion after cervical disc arthroplasty.
    Kim SW; Paik SH; Castro PA; Baek SW; Shin DJ; Kwak YH; Ju YS
    Spine J; 2010 Aug; 10(8):683-8. PubMed ID: 20537960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Postoperative segmental malalignment after surgery with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis: is it related to the mechanics and design of the prosthesis?
    Walraevens JR; Liu B; Sloten JV; Demaerel P; Goffin J
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Aug; 23(6):372-6. PubMed ID: 20124918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sagittal alignment comparison of Bryan disc arthroplasty with ProDisc-C arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Yanbin Z; Yu S; Zhongqiang C; Zhongjun L
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Aug; 24(6):381-5. PubMed ID: 21150665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sagittal alignment after single cervical disc arthroplasty.
    Guérin P; Obeid I; Gille O; Bourghli A; Luc S; Pointillart V; Vital JM
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Feb; 25(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 22124426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of arthroplasty design on cervical spine kinematics: analysis of the Bryan Disc, ProDisc-C, and Synergy disc.
    Lazaro BC; Yucesoy K; Yuksel KZ; Kowalczyk I; Rabin D; Fink M; Duggal N
    Neurosurg Focus; 2010 Jun; 28(6):E6. PubMed ID: 20568921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of anterior cervical foraminotomy vs arthroplasty for unilateral cervical radiculopathy.
    Yi S; Lim JH; Choi KS; Sheen YC; Park HK; Jang IT; Yoon DH
    Surg Neurol; 2009 Jun; 71(6):677-80, discussion 680. PubMed ID: 18786707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An analysis of heterotopic ossification in cervical disc arthroplasty: a novel morphologic classification of an ossified mass.
    Jin YJ; Park SB; Kim MJ; Kim KJ; Kim HJ
    Spine J; 2013 Apr; 13(4):408-20. PubMed ID: 23332520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical and radiological outcomes of modified techniques in Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty.
    Cao JM; Zhang YZ; Shen Y; Xu JX; Ding WY; Yang DL; Zhang D
    J Clin Neurosci; 2011 Oct; 18(10):1308-12. PubMed ID: 21840720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Design limitations of Bryan disc arthroplasty.
    Fong SY; DuPlessis SJ; Casha S; Hurlbert RJ
    Spine J; 2006; 6(3):233-41. PubMed ID: 16651216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Anterior Migration After Bryan Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: The Relationship Between Hyperlordosis and its Impact on Clinical Outcomes.
    Lei T; Tong T; Miao D; Gao X; Xu J; Zhang D; Shen Y
    World Neurosurg; 2017 May; 101():534-539. PubMed ID: 28245994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Early clinical and radiologic outcomes of cervical arthroplasty with Bryan Cervical Disc prosthesis.
    Shim CS; Lee SH; Park HJ; Kang HS; Hwang JH
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2006 Oct; 19(7):465-70. PubMed ID: 17021408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Early clinical and biomechanical results following cervical arthroplasty.
    Duggal N; Pickett GE; Mitsis DK; Keller JL
    Neurosurg Focus; 2004 Sep; 17(3):E9. PubMed ID: 15636565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sagittal alignment and the Bryan cervical artificial disc.
    Johnson JP; Lauryssen C; Cambron HO; Pashman R; Regan JJ; Anand N; Bray R
    Neurosurg Focus; 2004 Dec; 17(6):E14. PubMed ID: 15636571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does preoperative inferior endplate morphology influence the outcomes of cervical disc arthroplasty at C5-C6 level: A retrospective study.
    Hu X; Rong X; Liu H; Hong Y; Ding C; Wang B
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2020 Mar; 190():105666. PubMed ID: 31911321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.