BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17701301)

  • 1. The influence of residual stress on the shear strength between the bone and plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite coating.
    Yang YC; Yang CY
    J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2008 Mar; 19(3):1051-60. PubMed ID: 17701301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The shear strength and the failure mode of plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite coating to bone: the effect of coating thickness.
    Wang BC; Lee TM; Chang E; Yang CY
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1993 Oct; 27(10):1315-27. PubMed ID: 8245046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biaxial residual stress states of plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite coatings on titanium alloy substrate.
    Yang YC; Chan E; Hwang BH; Lee SY
    Biomaterials; 2000 Jul; 21(13):1327-37. PubMed ID: 10850926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of dissolution/precipitation on the residual stress redistribution of plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite coating on titanium substrate in simulated body fluid (SBF).
    Rakngarm Nimkerdphol A; Otsuka Y; Mutoh Y
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Aug; 36():98-108. PubMed ID: 24821139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hydroxyapatite-coating on titanium arc sprayed titanium implants.
    Nakashima Y; Hayashi K; Inadome T; Uenoyama K; Hara T; Kanemaru T; Sugioka Y; Noda I
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1997 Jun; 35(3):287-98. PubMed ID: 9138063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intramedullary implant of plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite coating: an interface study.
    Yang CY; Wang BC; Lee TM; Chang E; Chang GL
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1997 Jul; 36(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 9212387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mechanical and histological evaluations of hydroxyapatite-coated and noncoated Ti6Al4V implants in tibia bone.
    Chang CK; Wu JS; Mao DL; Ding CX
    J Biomed Mater Res; 2001 Jul; 56(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 11309786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite coatings and zirconia-reinforced hydroxyapatite composite coatings: in vivo study.
    Lee TM; Yang CY; Chang E; Tsai RS
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2004 Dec; 71(4):652-60. PubMed ID: 15505828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mechanical properties and Young's modulus of plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite coating on Ti substrate in simulated body fluid.
    Yang YC; Chang E; Lee SY
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2003 Dec; 67(3):886-99. PubMed ID: 14613237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neutron diffraction residual strain measurements in nanostructured hydroxyapatite coatings for orthopaedic implants.
    Ahmed R; Faisal NH; Paradowska AM; Fitzpatrick ME; Khor KA
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2011 Nov; 4(8):2043-54. PubMed ID: 22098904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Thermal residual stresses near the interface between plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite coating and titanium substrate: finite element analysis and synchrotron radiation measurements.
    Cofino B; Fogarassy P; Millet P; Lodini A
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2004 Jul; 70(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 15174105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Phase stability and biological property evaluation of plasma sprayed hydroxyapatite coatings for orthopedic and dental applications.
    Vahabzadeh S; Roy M; Bandyopadhyay A; Bose S
    Acta Biomater; 2015 Apr; 17():47-55. PubMed ID: 25638672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of titanium plasma-sprayed and plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite implants in vivo.
    Ong JL; Carnes DL; Bessho K
    Biomaterials; 2004 Aug; 25(19):4601-6. PubMed ID: 15120505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Compositionally graded doped hydroxyapatite coating on titanium using laser and plasma spray deposition for bone implants.
    Ke D; Vu AA; Bandyopadhyay A; Bose S
    Acta Biomater; 2019 Jan; 84():414-423. PubMed ID: 30500448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vivo evaluation of hydroxyapatite coatings of different crystallinities.
    Oh S; Tobin E; Yang Y; Carnes DL; Ong JL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(5):726-31. PubMed ID: 16274146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of bone-implant interface shear strength of solid hydroxyapatite and hydroxyapatite-coated titanium implants.
    Hayashi K; Inadome T; Mashima T; Sugioka Y
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1993 May; 27(5):557-63. PubMed ID: 8314808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Loading improves anchorage of hydroxyapatite implants more than titanium implants.
    Mouzin O; Søballe K; Bechtold JE
    J Biomed Mater Res; 2001; 58(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 11152999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vitro and in vivo biological responses of plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite coatings with posthydrothermal treatment.
    Yang CY; Lee TM; Yang CW; Chen LR; Wu MC; Lui TS
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2007 Nov; 83(2):263-71. PubMed ID: 17415765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparative study of zinc, magnesium, strontium-incorporated hydroxyapatite-coated titanium implants for osseointegration of osteopenic rats.
    Tao ZS; Zhou WS; He XW; Liu W; Bai BL; Zhou Q; Huang ZL; Tu KK; Li H; Sun T; Lv YX; Cui W; Yang L
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2016 May; 62():226-32. PubMed ID: 26952418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mechanical and histological evaluation of amorphous calcium phosphate and poorly crystallized hydroxyapatite coatings on titanium implants.
    Maxian SH; Zawadsky JP; Dunn MG
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1993 Jun; 27(6):717-28. PubMed ID: 8408101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.