223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17701434)
1. Bone ingrowth into a porous coated implant predicted by a mechano-regulatory tissue differentiation algorithm.
Liu X; Niebur GL
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2008 Aug; 7(4):335-44. PubMed ID: 17701434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bone ingrowth simulation for a concept glenoid component design.
Andreykiv A; Prendergast PJ; van Keulen F; Swieszkowski W; Rozing PM
J Biomech; 2005 May; 38(5):1023-33. PubMed ID: 15797584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Numerical simulation of bone regeneration in a bone chamber.
Geris L; Vandamme K; Naert I; Vander Sloten J; Duyck J; Van Oosterwyck H
J Dent Res; 2009 Feb; 88(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 19278988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differences in osseointegration rate due to implant surface geometry can be explained by local tissue strains.
Simmons CA; Meguid SA; Pilliar RM
J Orthop Res; 2001 Mar; 19(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 11347689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bone ingrowth around porous-coated acetabular implant: a three-dimensional finite element study using mechanoregulatory algorithm.
Mukherjee K; Gupta S
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2016 Apr; 15(2):389-403. PubMed ID: 26130375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Enhanced bone ingrowth and fixation strength with hydroxyapatite-coated porous implants.
Cook SD; Thomas KA; Dalton JE; Kay JF
Semin Arthroplasty; 1991 Oct; 2(4):268-79. PubMed ID: 10171176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of biophysical stimuli for mechano-regulation of tissue differentiation during fracture healing.
Isaksson H; Wilson W; van Donkelaar CC; Huiskes R; Ito K
J Biomech; 2006; 39(8):1507-16. PubMed ID: 15972212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Correlation of bony ingrowth to the distribution of stress and strain parameters surrounding a porous-coated implant.
Qin YX; McLeod KJ; Guilak F; Chiang FP; Rubin CT
J Orthop Res; 1996 Nov; 14(6):862-70. PubMed ID: 8982127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A new model to assess tibial fixation. II. Concurrent histologic and biomechanical observations.
Stulberg BN; Watson JT; Stulberg SD; Bauer TW; Manley MT
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1991 Feb; (263):303-9. PubMed ID: 1993387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A histomorphometric and histologic analysis of the implant interface in five successful, autopsy-retrieved, noncemented porous-coated knee arthroplasties.
Vigorita VJ; Minkowitz B; Dichiara JF; Higham PA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1993 Aug; (293):211-8. PubMed ID: 8339483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Heterotopic bone formation around sintered porous-surfaced Ti-6Al-4V implants coated with native bone morphogenetic proteins.
Simon Z; Deporter DA; Pilliar RM; Clokie CM
Implant Dent; 2006 Sep; 15(3):265-74. PubMed ID: 16966900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computational mechanobiology to study the effect of surface geometry on peri-implant tissue differentiation.
Andreykiv A; van Keulen F; Prendergast PJ
J Biomech Eng; 2008 Oct; 130(5):051015. PubMed ID: 19045522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Superior sealing effect of hydroxyapatite in porous-coated implants: experimental studies on the migration of polyethylene particles around stable and unstable implants in dogs.
Rahbek O; Kold S; Bendix K; Overgaard S; Søballe K
Acta Orthop; 2005 Jun; 76(3):375-85. PubMed ID: 16156466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of bone ingrowth around beaded coated tibial implant for total ankle replacement using mechanoregulatory algorithm.
Minku ; Mukherjee K; Ghosh R
Comput Biol Med; 2024 Jun; 175():108551. PubMed ID: 38703546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of a cell adhesion molecule coating on the blasted surface of titanium implants on bone healing in the rabbit femur.
Park JW; Lee SG; Choi BJ; Suh JY
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):533-41. PubMed ID: 17929513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of porous ingrowth in intervertebral disc prostheses: a nonhuman primate model.
McAfee PC; Cunningham BW; Orbegoso CM; Sefter JC; Dmitriev AE; Fedder IL
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Feb; 28(4):332-40. PubMed ID: 12590205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Field distributions in the rat tibia with and without a porous implant during electrical stimulation: a parametric modeling.
Ducheyne P; Ellis LY; Pollack SR; Pienkowski D; Cuckler JM
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1992 Nov; 39(11):1168-78. PubMed ID: 1487280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Numerical simulation of tissue differentiation around loaded titanium implants in a bone chamber.
Geris L; Andreykiv A; Van Oosterwyck H; Sloten JV; van Keulen F; Duyck J; Naert I
J Biomech; 2004 May; 37(5):763-9. PubMed ID: 15047006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of pulsing electromagnetic field on bone ingrowth into a porous coated implant.
Ijiri K; Matsunaga S; Fukuyama K; Maeda S; Sakou T; Kitano M; Senba I
Anticancer Res; 1996; 16(5A):2853-6. PubMed ID: 8917397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relationship between bone ingrowth, mineral apposition rate, and osteoblast activity.
Bloebaum RD; Willie BM; Mitchell BS; Hofmann AA
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2007 May; 81(2):505-14. PubMed ID: 17236212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
