BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17701637)

  • 21. Members of research ethics committees accepted a modification of the randomized consent design.
    Schellings R; Kessels AG; Ter Riet G; Kleijnen J; Leffers P; Knottnerus JA; Sturmans F
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Jun; 58(6):589-94. PubMed ID: 15878472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology
    J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2377-86. PubMed ID: 12721281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Health researchers' views of ethics committee functioning in New Zealand.
    Paul C
    N Z Med J; 2000 Jun; 113(1111):210-4. PubMed ID: 10909934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Ethics review committees for human research: the challenge of strengthening this process in Colombia].
    Miranda MC; Palma GI; Jaramillo E
    Biomedica; 2006 Mar; 26(1):138-44. PubMed ID: 16929911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Monitoring of health research by ethics committees.
    Douglass AJ; Jarvis A; Bloore S
    N Z Med J; 1998 Mar; 111(1061):79-81. PubMed ID: 9549558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Can we do better? Researchers' experiences with ethical review boards on projects with later life as a focus.
    Pachana NA; Liddle J; Peel NM; Beattie E; Juang C; Knight BG
    J Alzheimers Dis; 2015; 43(3):701-7. PubMed ID: 25374104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Rationalising public participation in the health service: the case of research ethics committees.
    Dyer S
    Health Place; 2004 Dec; 10(4):339-48. PubMed ID: 15491894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Are ethical committees reliable?
    Hotopf M; Wessely S; Noah N
    J R Soc Med; 1995 Jan; 88(1):31-3. PubMed ID: 7884767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Potential research ethics violations against an indigenous tribe in Ecuador: a mixed methods approach.
    Ortiz-Prado E; Simbaña-Rivera K; Gómez-Barreno L; Tamariz L; Lister A; Baca JC; Norris A; Adana-Diaz L
    BMC Med Ethics; 2020 Oct; 21(1):100. PubMed ID: 33069227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Medical research and the ethics committee. A questionnaire study among project leaders in the health region 4].
    Hals A; Jacobsen G
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1994 Dec; 114(30):3650-4. PubMed ID: 7825151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Education of ethics committee members: experiences from Croatia.
    Borovecki A; ten Have H; Oresković S
    J Med Ethics; 2006 Mar; 32(3):138-42. PubMed ID: 16507656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Views of the process and content of ethical reviews of HIV vaccine trials among members of US institutional review boards and South African research ethics committees.
    Klitzman R
    Dev World Bioeth; 2008 Dec; 8(3):207-18. PubMed ID: 19046258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Guidance on Making Proposals to Conduct Gene Therapy Research on Human Subjects.
    Gene Therapy Advisory Committee (Great Britain)
    Gene Ther; 1994 Nov; 1(6):343-363 (inset). PubMed ID: 11644650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Basingstoke LREC revisited.
    Barnard K
    Bull Med Ethics; 1997 Aug; No. 130():13-7. PubMed ID: 11657183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Access to medical records for the purposes of medical audit.
    Conference of Medical Royal Colleges and Their Faculties in the United Kingdom. Audit Working Group
    BMJ; 1993 Apr; 306(6882):896-7. PubMed ID: 11643122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Reviewing research involving children: the practice of British research ethics committees.
    Hall D
    IRB; 1988; 10(2):1-5. PubMed ID: 11650021
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Research in nursing education and the institutional review board/ethics committee.
    Oermann MH; Barton A; Yoder-Wise PS; Morton PG
    J Prof Nurs; 2021; 37(2):342-347. PubMed ID: 33867088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Recent topics on ethical issues in psychiatry, mental care and welfare].
    Takahashi K
    Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 2002; 104(9):725-34. PubMed ID: 12481440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Ethical dilemmas of a large national multi-centre study in Australia: time for some consistency.
    Driscoll A; Currey J; Worrall-Carter L; Stewart S
    J Clin Nurs; 2008 Aug; 17(16):2212-20. PubMed ID: 18705740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Training needs assessment in research ethics evaluation among research ethics committee members in three African countries: Cameroon, Mali and Tanzania.
    Ateudjieu J; Williams J; Hirtle M; Baume C; Ikingura J; Niaré A; Sprumont D
    Dev World Bioeth; 2010 Aug; 10(2):88-98. PubMed ID: 19912281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.