172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17701729)
1. Sagittal split advancement osteotomy: comparison of the tendency to relapse after two different methods of rigid fixation.
Kahnberg KE; Kashani H; Owman-Moll P
Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg; 2007; 41(4):167-72. PubMed ID: 17701729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Transverse displacement of the proximal segment after bilateral sagittal osteotomy: a comparison of lag screw fixation versus miniplates with monocortical screw technique.
Becktor JP; Rebellato J; Sollenius O; Vedtofte P; Isaksson S
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jan; 66(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 18083423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Skeletal stability following mandibular advancement and rigid fixation with polylactide biodegradable screws.
Kallela I; Laine P; Suuronen R; Iizuka T; Pirinen S; Lindqvist C
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1998 Feb; 27(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 9506290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of postoperative stability of three rigid internal fixation techniques after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular advancement.
Sato FR; Asprino L; Fernandes Moreira RW; de Moraes M
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):e224-9. PubMed ID: 24103461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Rigid versus wire fixation for mandibular advancement: skeletal and dental changes after 5 years.
Dolce C; Hatch JP; Van Sickels JE; Rugh JD
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Jun; 121(6):610-9. PubMed ID: 12080314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Skeletal stability following miniplate fixation after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for mandibular advancement.
Abeloos J; De Clercq C; Neyt L
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1993 Apr; 51(4):366-9. PubMed ID: 8450352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Skeletal relapse after mandibular advancement and setback in single-jaw surgery.
Eggensperger N; Smolka W; Rahal A; Iizuka T
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Dec; 62(12):1486-96. PubMed ID: 15573348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of skeletal stability after mandibular advancement and use of two rigid internal fixation techniques.
Blomqvist JE; Ahlborg G; Isaksson S; Svartz K
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1997 Jun; 55(6):568-74; discussion 574-5. PubMed ID: 9191638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Skeletal stability after mandibular advancement with rigid versus wire fixation.
Dolce C; Van Sickels JE; Bays RA; Rugh JD
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Nov; 58(11):1219-27; discussion 1227-8. PubMed ID: 11078132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: advancement surgery.
Brasileiro BF; Grempel RG; Ambrosano GM; Passeri LA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 67(4):809-17. PubMed ID: 19304039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Skeletal stability after mandibular advancement in bilateral sagittal split osteotomies during adolescence.
den Besten CA; Mensink G; van Merkesteyn JP
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Jul; 41(5):e78-82. PubMed ID: 23253633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stability after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy advancement surgery with rigid internal fixation: a systematic review.
Joss CU; Vassalli IM
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Feb; 67(2):301-13. PubMed ID: 19138603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stabilisation of sagittal split advancement osteotomies with miniplates: a prospective, multicentre study with two-year follow-up. Part II. Radiographic parameters.
Borstlap WA; Stoelinga PJ; Hoppenreijs TJ; van't Hof MA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Sep; 33(6):535-42. PubMed ID: 15308251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Short- and long-term skeletal relapse after mandibular advancement surgery.
Eggensperger N; Smolka K; Luder J; Iizuka T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Jan; 35(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 16344217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-term comparison of treatment outcome and stability of Class II patients treated with functional appliances versus bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Berger JL; Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; George C; Kaczynski R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):451-64; quiz 516-7. PubMed ID: 15821690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Transverse displacement of the proximal segment after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy advancement and its effect on relapse.
Angle AD; Rebellato J; Sheats RD
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jan; 65(1):50-9. PubMed ID: 17174764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The value of long-term follow-up of mandibular advancement surgery in patients with a low to normal mandibular plane angle.
Bouwman JP; Tuinzing DB; Kostense PJ; van Teeseling RA; Mokhtari H
Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 1997 Nov; 1(6):311-5. PubMed ID: 9433095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative study of skeletal stability between bicortical resorbable and titanium screw fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular prognathism.
Paeng JY; Hong J; Kim CS; Kim MJ
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):660-4. PubMed ID: 22209495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Long term stability of mandibular advancement procedures: bilateral sagittal split osteotomy versus distraction osteogenesis.
Baas EM; Pijpe J; de Lange J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 41(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 22137334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stability of mandibular advancement procedures: bilateral sagittal split osteotomy versus distraction osteogenesis.
Vos MD; Baas EM; de Lange J; Bierenbroodspot F
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 38(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 18977640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
