These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17701899)
1. Flexible design for following up positive findings. Yu K; Chatterjee N; Wheeler W; Li Q; Wang S; Rothman N; Wacholder S Am J Hum Genet; 2007 Sep; 81(3):540-51. PubMed ID: 17701899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accurate modeling of replication rates in genome-wide association studies by accounting for Winner's Curse and study-specific heterogeneity. Zou J; Zhou J; Faller S; Brown RP; Sankararaman SS; Eskin E G3 (Bethesda); 2022 Dec; 12(12):. PubMed ID: 36250793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Power estimation and sample size determination for replication studies of genome-wide association studies. Jiang W; Yu W BMC Genomics; 2016 Jan; 17 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):3. PubMed ID: 26818952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Design considerations for genetic linkage and association studies. Nsengimana J; Bishop DT Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 850():237-62. PubMed ID: 22307702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantifying and correcting for the winner's curse in genetic association studies. Xiao R; Boehnke M Genet Epidemiol; 2009 Jul; 33(5):453-62. PubMed ID: 19140131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Review and further developments in statistical corrections for Winner's Curse in genetic association studies. Forde A; Hemani G; Ferguson J PLoS Genet; 2023 Sep; 19(9):e1010546. PubMed ID: 37721937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. BR-squared: a practical solution to the winner's curse in genome-wide scans. Sun L; Dimitromanolakis A; Faye LL; Paterson AD; Waggott D; ; Bull SB Hum Genet; 2011 May; 129(5):545-52. PubMed ID: 21246217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Practical help for specifying the target difference in sample size calculations for RCTs: the DELTA Cook JA; Julious SA; Sones W; Hampson LV; Hewitt C; Berlin JA; Ashby D; Emsley R; Fergusson DA; Walters SJ; Wilson EC; MacLennan G; Stallard N; Rothwell JC; Bland M; Brown L; Ramsay CR; Cook A; Armstrong D; Altman D; Vale LD Health Technol Assess; 2019 Oct; 23(60):1-88. PubMed ID: 31661431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Illustrating, Quantifying, and Correcting for Bias in Post-hoc Analysis of Gene-Based Rare Variant Tests of Association. Grinde KE; Arbet J; Green A; O'Connell M; Valcarcel A; Westra J; Tintle N Front Genet; 2017; 8():117. PubMed ID: 28959274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An empirical investigation into the impact of winner's curse on estimates from Mendelian randomization. Jiang T; Gill D; Butterworth AS; Burgess S Int J Epidemiol; 2023 Aug; 52(4):1209-1219. PubMed ID: 36573802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Winner's Curse Correction and Variable Thresholding Improve Performance of Polygenic Risk Modeling Based on Genome-Wide Association Study Summary-Level Data. Shi J; Park JH; Duan J; Berndt ST; Moy W; Yu K; Song L; Wheeler W; Hua X; Silverman D; Garcia-Closas M; Hsiung CA; Figueroa JD; Cortessis VK; Malats N; Karagas MR; Vineis P; Chang IS; Lin D; Zhou B; Seow A; Matsuo K; Hong YC; Caporaso NE; Wolpin B; Jacobs E; Petersen GM; Klein AP; Li D; Risch H; Sanders AR; Hsu L; Schoen RE; Brenner H; ; ; ; ; ; ; Stolzenberg-Solomon R; Gejman P; Lan Q; Rothman N; Amundadottir LT; Landi MT; Levinson DF; Chanock SJ; Chatterjee N PLoS Genet; 2016 Dec; 12(12):e1006493. PubMed ID: 28036406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Two-sample comparison based on prediction error, with applications to candidate gene association studies. Yu K; Martin R; Rothman N; Zheng T; Lan Q Ann Hum Genet; 2007 Jan; 71(Pt 1):107-18. PubMed ID: 17227481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Resampling to Address the Winner's Curse in Genetic Association Analysis of Time to Event. Poirier JG; Faye LL; Dimitromanolakis A; Paterson AD; Sun L; Bull SB Genet Epidemiol; 2015 Nov; 39(7):518-28. PubMed ID: 26411674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Power, false discovery rate and Winner's Curse in eQTL studies. Huang QQ; Ritchie SC; Brozynska M; Inouye M Nucleic Acids Res; 2018 Dec; 46(22):e133. PubMed ID: 30189032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Adaptive two-stage analysis of genetic association in case-control designs. Zheng G; Song K; Elston RC Hum Hered; 2007; 63(3-4):175-86. PubMed ID: 17310127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sample-size properties of a case-control association analysis of multistage SNP studies for identifying disease susceptibility genes. Kitamura N; Akazawa K; Toyabe SI; Miyashita A; Kuwano R; Nakamura J J Hum Genet; 2008; 53(5):390-400. PubMed ID: 18288444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A varying-stage adaptive phase II/III clinical trial design. Dong G Stat Med; 2014 Apr; 33(8):1272-87. PubMed ID: 24273128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A flexible genome-wide bootstrap method that accounts for ranking and threshold-selection bias in GWAS interpretation and replication study design. Faye LL; Sun L; Dimitromanolakis A; Bull SB Stat Med; 2011 Jul; 30(15):1898-912. PubMed ID: 21538984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Flexible two-stage design with sample size reassessment for survival trials. Desseaux K; Porcher R Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(27):5002-13. PubMed ID: 17577242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]