These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17702065)

  • 1. Low EOF rate measurement based on constant effective mobility in microchip CE.
    Wang W; Zhao L; Zhou F; Zhang JR; Zhu JJ; Chen HY
    Electrophoresis; 2007 Aug; 28(16):2893-6. PubMed ID: 17702065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. EOF measurement by detection of a sampling zone with end-channel amperometry in microchip CE.
    Wang W; Zhao L; Jiang LP; Zhang JR; Zhu JJ; Chen HY
    Electrophoresis; 2006 Dec; 27(24):5132-7. PubMed ID: 17161004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measurement of electroosmotic flow in capillary and microchip electrophoresis.
    Wang W; Zhou F; Zhao L; Zhang JR; Zhu JJ
    J Chromatogr A; 2007 Nov; 1170(1-2):1-8. PubMed ID: 17915240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Low electroosmotic flow measurement by tilting microchip.
    Zhou F; Wang W; Wu WY; Zhang JR; Zhu JJ
    J Chromatogr A; 2008 Jun; 1194(2):221-4. PubMed ID: 18499115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Versatile method for electroosmotic flow measurements in microchip electrophoresis.
    Shakalisava Y; Poitevin M; Viovy JL; Descroix S
    J Chromatogr A; 2009 Feb; 1216(6):1030-3. PubMed ID: 19118836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measuring electroosmotic flow in microchips and capillaries.
    Gilman SD; Chapman PJ
    Methods Mol Biol; 2006; 339():187-202. PubMed ID: 16790874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modeling of electroosmotic and electrophoretic mobilization in capillary and microchip isoelectric focusing.
    Thormann W; Caslavska J; Mosher RA
    J Chromatogr A; 2007 Jul; 1155(2):154-63. PubMed ID: 17307189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of electroosmotic markers in aqueous and nonaqueous capillary electrophoresis.
    Hellqvist A; Hedeland Y; Pettersson C
    Electrophoresis; 2013 Dec; 34(24):3252-9. PubMed ID: 24123115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Indirect amperometric measurement of electroosmotic flow rates and effective mobilities in microchip capillary electrophoresis.
    Wang W; Zhao L; Zhang JR; Zhu JJ
    J Chromatogr A; 2007 Feb; 1142(2):209-13. PubMed ID: 17222859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Separation of inorganic and small organic anions by CE using phosphonium-based mono- and dicationic reagents.
    Krízek T; Breitbach ZS; Armstrong DW; Tesarová E; Coufal P
    Electrophoresis; 2009 Nov; 30(22):3955-63. PubMed ID: 19847805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of PVP on the electroosmotic mobility of wet-etched glass microchannels.
    Milanova D; Chambers RD; Bahga SS; Santiago JG
    Electrophoresis; 2012 Nov; 33(21):3259-62. PubMed ID: 23065690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Control of the EOF in CE using polyelectrolytes of different charge densities.
    Danger G; Ramonda M; Cottet H
    Electrophoresis; 2007 Mar; 28(6):925-31. PubMed ID: 17309049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electroosmotic flow in microchannels with nanostructures.
    Yasui T; Kaji N; Mohamadi MR; Okamoto Y; Tokeshi M; Horiike Y; Baba Y
    ACS Nano; 2011 Oct; 5(10):7775-80. PubMed ID: 21902222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. System peaks in capillary zone electrophoresis of anions with negative voltage polarity and counter-electroosmotic flow.
    Sursyakova VV; Kalyakin SN; Burmakina GV; Rubaylo AI
    Electrophoresis; 2011 Jan; 32(2):210-7. PubMed ID: 21254117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Highly efficient dynamic modification of plastic microfluidic devices using proteins in microchip capillary electrophoresis.
    Naruishi N; Tanaka Y; Higashi T; Wakida S
    J Chromatogr A; 2006 Oct; 1130(2):169-74. PubMed ID: 16860810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sample Injection Techniques.
    Karlinsey JM
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1906():55-64. PubMed ID: 30488384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detecting deviations from pure EOF during CE separations.
    O'Grady JF; Noonan KY; McDonnell P; Mancuso AJ; Frederick KA
    Electrophoresis; 2007 Jul; 28(14):2385-90. PubMed ID: 17632806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Photobleaching-based flow measurement in a commercial capillary electrophoresis chip instrument.
    Wang GR; Sas I; Jiang H; Janzen WP; Hodge CN
    Electrophoresis; 2008 Mar; 29(6):1253-63. PubMed ID: 18297657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Determination of effective mobilities of EOF markers in BGE containing sulfated β-cyclodextrin by a two-detector method.
    Müllerová L; Dubský P; Svobodová J; Gaš B
    Electrophoresis; 2013 Mar; 34(5):768-76. PubMed ID: 23192321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The CE way of thinking: "all is relative!".
    Schmitt-Kopplin P; Fekete A
    Methods Mol Biol; 2008; 384():611-29. PubMed ID: 18392586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.